Dear Sir,Dear Suvarchas ji,
Your words are giving us confidence. I am sure we will able to proceed further. I will contact all of you who have given your details to me and get back to the forum.
Thanks.
Incidentally, Maths and monasticism in Hinduism are actually imports from Buddhism and Jainism. We can thank Sankara for this import. In actual Vedic Hinduism, we only had forest ashrams, some of which contained one or more rshis and some larger ashrams that were also gurukulams. Such hermitages were much more uncomplicated than the Maths. Unlike wealthy and politically powerful maths, there were no wealthy ashrams, nor were there fights to become the pontiff. By and large they stuck to their prime business of scholarship.
True in vedic times there were only forest ashrams. They also gave rise to the aranyaka texts or so it seems (though GM Williams dates the aranyaka period from 900 to 600bc).
But monasticism is not really imported from Buddism.
The upanishadic period started around 900-800bc. It predates Buddhism. And monastacism (parivrajaka wandering monks) in hinduism happened in the upanishadic period.
It is possible they began organizing themselves as maths before buddhism took root. However, it is not clear whether the whole concept of maths to serve as an institution for monks was started by Buddhist monks or Hindu ones.
I don't think you will be able to give me hard evidence or non-speculative sources about the existence of Hindu "maths" in or near city centers (as opposed to Forest Ashrams) from pre-Buddhist times. Note that such maths must also minister and be part of the social polity of the city center. Also, I may have an open mind on the Upanishadic dates you offer, but most of my academic colleagues who deal with Indology, won't agree.
Dear all,
I am in the process of establishing contacts in the mutt so that we get a chance to meet the acharyas in person, obtain his blessings and discuss the issue. Hope lord will help us take the issue forward. As suggested by Mr Suvarchas I tried to contact Mr Rama sharma many times, but could not get him on line. I will continue with my effort.
Dear Sir,Dear all,
In the last few weeks I have been speaking to number of people on the issue of re-energising the mutt and implementing the plan that we have discussed so far. Today I spoke to Mr Venkateshwar Rao, at Kanchi matam. I thank Mr Suvarchas for providing the contact numbers. It was a satisfying experience talking to Mr Rao. He has been involved with mutt closely from 1964 onwards. He has a strong faith in the mutt and acharyas. He explained how the relationship between guru and shishya should be based on complete trust and not on skepticism.
After hearing to Mr Rao, it was indeed very difficult for me to tell him what the members of the forum feel about the mutt and its affairs. Somehow I gathered courage and told him about the feelings expressed in the forum. I even requested him to go through it which he agreed to. At first he suggested to say that these kinds of doubts should be ignored if one was a true devotee of the mutt. But when I explained that there is a duty for the faithful to clarify the issues raised by other members of the community he agreed completely and kindly consented to address our concerns.
As a first step, I am sending a letter to Mr Rao, to which he would provide his perspective. I feel this is necessary in the light of the fact that we would have to interact with mutt authorities some time later when we discuss the issues deeply. I shall post -in a day or two, the letter to the mutt and the reply from Mr Rao when I receive it.
On the other hand, there are some efforts being made by some members of the forum to place take the issue before the acharyas directly. All of you would agree that such an attempt would take some time because we need to identify the right platform for conveying our concerns to the acharyas. Hopefully we should see some progress in this direction shortly, with the efforts of our members.
I feel it is important to take the issue on both fronts - through the faithful volunteers of the mutt on one side and through a group of well wishers on the other. There is a point of convergence at some point which would be most crucial. Nothing would move forward without the blessings of both the acharyas in the steps we initiate. When we move in both directions, the blessings can be easily converted into action. I shall elaborate more as the process moves forward.
Thanks
to begin with ...
the mutt can start by not selling education and healthcare ... by taking it to the deserving and by stopping to have money and influence play such important parts in these institutions ... can take a leaf out of puttaparthi ....
then their HH can start walking wherever they go .. no one is going to achieve more than the adi acharya or paramacharya , jus coz they "fly" everywhere ... as for not walking coz of security issues ... there is always the inspiration to look at how sri lakshmi nrisimha karavalamba stotram came about , the adi acharya did not even try to protect himself from someone who wanted to hurt him .... if paramacharya's grace is not enough security for them to give up all this paraphernelia like a/c .. cooler ... high-fi transport .. cellphone and all ... no amt of effort is going to succeed ... a lil living by example wuld help ...
the very title of this thread only suggests that the mutt and its keepers have moved away from paramacharya's simplicity of living by example and his austerity , first and foremost ....