• This forum contains old posts that have been closed. New threads and replies may not be made here. Please navigate to the relevant forum to create a new thread or post a reply.
  • Welcome to Tamil Brahmins forums.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our Free Brahmin Community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

SC recognises right to negative vote

Status
Not open for further replies.
Will it be counted? I do not think so? So it will not impact the outcome of the results...But at least our voice can be captured if we do not agree..May be we will consider the negative votes after some cooling period!

SC recognises right to negative vote, EVMs to have 'none of the above' button: In a landmark decision, the Supreme Court has recognised the right to negative vote. The SC directs the Election Commission to have a 'none of the above' button in the EVMs.

The Supreme Court says that negative voting would foster purity and vibrancy in elections.

The SC arrived at the decision after hearing a petition filed by the [People's Union for Civil Liberties & Anr. v. Union of India & Anr., WP (c) no. 161/2004] seeking, the right of negative voting.

The petition has sought directions to be issued to the Election Commission to make appropriate provisions in the Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs) and ballot papers so as to enable the voters to exercise their right of negative voting and also ensure that the exercise of this right is kept secret.

The Supreme Court says that negative voting would lead to systemic change in polls and political parties will be forced to project clean candidates.

The SC has also asked the EC to maintain secrecy while a negative vote is being cast

The petition for the right to negative vote was first filed in 2004. The apex court bench of Chief Justice P Sathasivam, Justice Ranjana Prakash Desai and Justice Ranjan Gogoi said that negative voting would gradually lead to systemic changes as political parties will have to respect the will of the people in selecting their candidates.

Pronouncing the judgment, Chief Justice Sathasivam said the mechanism of negative voting is necessary and a vibrant part of democracy.

This is a landmark judgment and is bound to have plenty of political implications.

The Supreme Court has also said that the right to vote is a statutory right, and the right to reject a candidate is fundamental right of speech and expression under the Constitution.

India votes in the Lok Sabha polls in 2014.
 
IF every party ends up with negative votes

then these Einsteins will have to remember that :loco:

-1 > -10 > -100 > -1000!!! :confusion:

WILL they??? :decision: WONT they???
 
IF every party ends up with negative votes

then these Einsteins will have to remember that :loco:

-1 > -10 > -100 > -1000!!! :confusion:

WILL they??? :decision: WONT they???

It will not be party wise....It will be constituency wise...For example Thousand lights has -1000 votes against -5000 for say T.Nagar
 
The center is opposing the None of the Above (NOTA) option as we are suppose to elect not reject while BJP is welcoming the land mark judgment!
 
In the manual method one can make his vote invalid by several means - stamping at the wrong place or multiple contestants. But it was mainly due to mistake than genuine rejection. The new digital version does allow voter to express his disgust.

For known reasons, all the parties propose candidates - dada against dada, minority against minority etc.

A welcome step to gauge public opinion. If more than 50% of the votes (majority as per supreme court directions in reservation verdict) are in this category, the election can be cancelled (if the EC has powers for countermanding).
 
.But at least our voice can be captured if we do not agree..


Sir,

True.

But what about the freebies offered at eleventh hour, the deciding factor of the outcome at times?


With regards:)



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Isvarah Sarvabhutanam hriddese tishthati"
 
Sir,

True.

But what about the freebies offered at eleventh hour, the deciding factor of the outcome at times?


With regards:)



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Isvarah Sarvabhutanam hriddese tishthati"

Our public are intelligent...They will take the freebies as it stolen money from us but they may still voice their dissent...If more than 50% have cast negative votes & elections are countermanded, in the next elections, the parties will be forced to nominate good people (not the corrupt with criminal background)...The corrupt (Read UPA) is shouting hoarse while the BJP (Who is better of the 2 from corruption/criminality)) is supporting
 
: SC recognises right to negative vote

Theoretically OK., But in a Country Votes are polled on the basis of various extraneous reasons
like Freebees, Caste, Religion, Language etc. how far the negative votes will be of use is a question.
 
but they may still voice their dissent...If more than 50% have cast negative votes & elections are countermanded, in the next elections, the parties will be forced to nominate good people


Sir,

So, hopefully the ensuing election will be somewhat candidate oriented and not Party oriented as has been hitherto.


With regards:)



-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Isvarah Sarvabhutanam hriddese tishthati"
 
The decision on countermanding is not yet decided..Supreme court which is the enforcer/ forceful implementer in our country has decided to clean up the electoral system...It is a good beginning..I am sure they will come with clarifications after the 1st round of Assembly elections in Nov'13
 
This is a shot in the arm for the Democratic System. This empowers people more.

It would be better if the Election Commission bans once and for all, all the candidates from contesting forthcoming elections, if in the constituency he/she contests, 50% or more of the total votes polled (not the total number of electorate in the constituency) are 'None of the above'.

Simple Arithmetic. If the number of voters in a constituency is 100,000 and if the total number of votes polled across all candidates is 80,000 and if 40,000 or more are 'None of the above', then none of the candidates shall contest any elections in future. However the elections results for the time being shall be decided upon the 40,000 or less of the total votes decisively polled. The candidate who won the election shall enjoy the privelege of being an MLA or MP for the current period. The political future of all the candidates including the winner shall be put to death.
 
The center is opposing the None of the Above (NOTA) option as we are suppose to elect not reject while BJP is welcoming the land mark judgment!

Men of integrity would welcome the SC decision.

The corrupt, the scandalous, the anti-social, the autocratic, the wicked, the unrighteous, the unvirtuous, the mean, will oppose the decision. They have already started panicking and terribly jolted and are jittering.​
 
Previously people who do not like to vote to person belonging to any major Political Party voted for some independent candidate and now they can exercise this option and we need to see how many people cast a negative vote .
 
Now, to add to the Supreme court's ruling, Rahul Gandhi describes the ordinance to protect convicted lawmakers as "complete nonsense", that it is a document that "should be torn up and thrown away". ( Reposted from Politics section). Has Rahul started feeling the pulse of the common man?
 
Last edited:
Now, to add to the Supreme court's ruling, Rahul Gandhi describes the ordinance to protect convicted lawmakers as "complete nonsense", that it is a document that "should be torn up and thrown away". ( Reposted from Politics section). Has Rahul started feeling the pulse of the common man?

Do you really think these people do not know the right from the wrong sir? :drama:
 
The for pillars of Democracy are
Legislature
Executive
Judiciary
Press.
But like Dharma which stood on four legs in Satya yuga
and is now standing on just one leg in Kaliyuga,
the democracy is also balancing just on one leg.
 
I feel this rule will only benefit bigger parties with deeper pockets and not benefit the common man after all. Any constituency which rejects all the candidates will have to go through the election process again. After a few iterations, not many parties will have the wherewithal to spend on elections and people may be forced to choose among even worse candidates.
 
I tend to agree somewhat with #21.

After negating, what then for the voter? What is in store next? It is a rather vague 'peek around the corner', after pressing the "none of the above" button.

Not to mention the huge burden of cost on the govt. machinery.
 
In all 14 countries including our neighbour Bangladesh now have this negative vote...It will actually deter political parties from nominating anti social elements /those with criminal records for the post so that they do not get negative votes in the election..Should result in a churn

Let us wait and watch whether it works this way in our country!
 
This would probably help if a rule to ban for life, the candidate(s) who have been rejected by the voters, is introduced.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Latest ads

Back
Top