Dear HappyHindu Ji,
I do not know how untouchability came about, but there are clues from our scriptures.
Over time, certain occupations within the society were viewed as unclean and so the families of such persons started living at the edges of the village as well as the society.
Dealing in dead bodies, butchering of animals for meat, dealing with human waste etc., have come to be viewed as unclean. There was probably a valid reasons to do so, since all these occupations during the past did not employ proper hygeinic and infectious insulations from the rest of the society when they came in to contact with each other. This is quite understandable in a tropical climate. So, as usual this practice got institutionalized, with elaborate theory built around 'evil' spirits associated with such practices. It always struck me as odd that 'Madi' and 'Theettu' can be violated/practiced just by a gaze from a distance! So, this tells me that various rules were instituted to prevent such contacts, backed by superstition.
In my opinion, Sage Kaushika's burning of the bird and getting 'educated' by an ordinary wife and the village butcher, as well as the story of Adi Shankara's encounter with Shiva in an untouchable's garb are examples of our society grappling with this issue.
The underlying theory for this practice to be justified came from the Varna/Jathi theory, a well developed Guna theory to support it, and a well thought out mis interpretation of Karma theory on top of it.
So, we have this problem, now that we have a modern society with traditional roles all mixed up and democracy came.
This is not a Brahmin issue. The two tumbler system is practiced by a whole lot of Hindus and is prevalent everywhere in India.
As usual, some Hindus twist this sorry history of our religion and make it seem that the problem started when foreigners invaded our land. They can not show any proof of this. Hope this answers your question.
Regards,
KRS
I do not know how untouchability came about, but there are clues from our scriptures.
Over time, certain occupations within the society were viewed as unclean and so the families of such persons started living at the edges of the village as well as the society.
Dealing in dead bodies, butchering of animals for meat, dealing with human waste etc., have come to be viewed as unclean. There was probably a valid reasons to do so, since all these occupations during the past did not employ proper hygeinic and infectious insulations from the rest of the society when they came in to contact with each other. This is quite understandable in a tropical climate. So, as usual this practice got institutionalized, with elaborate theory built around 'evil' spirits associated with such practices. It always struck me as odd that 'Madi' and 'Theettu' can be violated/practiced just by a gaze from a distance! So, this tells me that various rules were instituted to prevent such contacts, backed by superstition.
In my opinion, Sage Kaushika's burning of the bird and getting 'educated' by an ordinary wife and the village butcher, as well as the story of Adi Shankara's encounter with Shiva in an untouchable's garb are examples of our society grappling with this issue.
The underlying theory for this practice to be justified came from the Varna/Jathi theory, a well developed Guna theory to support it, and a well thought out mis interpretation of Karma theory on top of it.
So, we have this problem, now that we have a modern society with traditional roles all mixed up and democracy came.
This is not a Brahmin issue. The two tumbler system is practiced by a whole lot of Hindus and is prevalent everywhere in India.
As usual, some Hindus twist this sorry history of our religion and make it seem that the problem started when foreigners invaded our land. They can not show any proof of this. Hope this answers your question.
Regards,
KRS
Dear Sri KRS-ji,
If you do not mind, am interested in knowing more abt the above.
I know theetu was followed in non-brahmin homes such as well in the past.
It seems 'social evolution' has happened really fast in these years.
According to my mum, they were not even taken to Shiva temples as children and she began visiting Shiva temples only as a teenager.
Such was the orthodox way in which they were raised. That side of the people are rather content to say they were gollas in some ancient times (some oral history: they call themselves yadavulu and everything is centered arounf Krishna) and I was very highly surprised to come to know recently, that until 4 generations ago some of them underwent samasraya and even until 3 generations ago a few underwent upanayanam. Seems like they became a sanskritized lot somewhere in between and now its back to basics. In my generation, I seem to be the only one who takes interest in knowing such things. And in the younger generations, its an other story...it wud be a wonder if some of them even remember their parents' names after a few years.