N
Nara
Guest
If only she will answer back, no Mrs. RR?Even 'mantra's can produce children! We have to ask Kunti Devi for details.
Cheers!
If only she will answer back, no Mrs. RR?Even 'mantra's can produce children! We have to ask Kunti Devi for details.
For example when exactly in the stage of development of the embryo does the soul fit into it? and so on.
No, no that is too scientific an answer. I know I asked for it! Reproduction does not necessarily need to happen in the way we know it happens now.
Dear Renuka,
Some thoughts. It seems to me that a soul has a range of something say energy or whatever and is attached to a body till the energy or whatever of the body is within the bounds. The bond with the body would be strongest at birth and gradually weakens as the body begins to lose its vitality. When the bound is exceeded the normal departure of soul from the body happens.
Now if you are able to create a body that is in the same bounds of that something and if it is possible to create that , you have created another receptacle for your soul. What would happen in such a case? One can only speculate. But in normal transmigration what would happen? The soul moves from one body to another, both not present simultaneously. And what happens to the soul after death? Does that range of something I am talking about change? I think it should because the soul fits into a different body.
I think without the right spiritual knowledge one cannot make much progress in this direction. But intuitively it seems plausible to me with the right knowledge.
Dear Renuka,
Some thoughts. It seems to me that a soul has a range of something say energy or whatever and is attached to a body till the energy or whatever of the body is within the bounds. The bond with the body would be strongest at birth and gradually weakens as the body begins to lose its vitality. When the bound is exceeded the normal departure of soul from the body happens.
Let me try to answer this part before I sign off for the day(I am working half day today)
Do you really think its a weakening of the energy bond? Like a handphone not getting charged and ceases to function or is it that each person comes with a Karmic time frame for our life in the gross world?
Yes Mr. Prof. Sir!!If only she will answer back, no Mrs. RR?
Y wait for nine months, Renu! The stork brings the baby straight away!!I used to tell my mother when I was young.."why couldnt we humans have a cocoon and hang the cocoon on some tree and pick up the baby 9 months later"
Thanks for the detailed biological explanation. One thing I would like to posit though: cloning is not a way of avoiding death. Just like, having a twin sibling or even children. They are individuals having identical or very similar gene structure, but they are different individuals nevertheless.
Dolly the sheep's clone was more like a twin sister. If Dolly dies, Dolly dies, that's the end of that individual.
Dear Renuka,
Yes the former I think is just the mechanism by which our destiny is carried out
Sravna,
I couldnt resists logging in to type this..I was thinking of this during lunch and I feel I will go by the Karmic Time frame and not by the Energy Bond.
Reasons:
1)If energy bond is strongest at birth and weakens as we get older and finally shuts down and physical death happens..if this is true there should not be any death in utero ,any still birth ,any infant death or any death at a young age.
2)I go by the Karmic Time Frame cos death can come knocking at our door at any age and time and Death(Yama) is also known as Kaala(Time).
A state beyond death is called Kaalaathita(Kaala=Time, Athita=crossed,beyond)
Scientists may look at prolonging the life of the individual by understanding MORE about the telomeres and the process of DNA replication, and aspects of RNA polymerase in transcribing for new proteins and enzymes, and fats etc in ageing cells.
Equally well, they can work on human cloning to propagate Yamaka, Sravna, Nara, Shiv and others forever, after establishing legal parameters for their health and personal needs and sustenance etc..
It's all in the future for the Scientists to achieve... that's the promise of Science and the Scientific PROCESS.
Where does the Religion & God go from here, anyway?
Cheers.
Will science believe that Bhishma existed? !Bhishma chose when to die. All science has to do is ponder over this.
If they have an open mind I suppose. Sample thisWill science believe that Bhishma existed? !
Shri Yamaka,
You say that science with gaining of much more sound and strong knowledge/understanding of human/animals body anatomy, in due course of time, can succeed in prolonging the life.
As you said, if this happenes, than I think there will be some work out on the basis of which it would be determined as to what limited time span humans would be allowed to surrvive on this Earth. Say may be 200 years or max.300 years??
It sounds great!!!!!! May be??
I have a question here, I am much concerned with...Just remaining alive for 100 or more years is not sensible unless a person could be healthy and enjoy his life reasonably.
Instead of attempting towards enhancing the desired surviving years, why science is not attempting and coud not succed in the following, so that human can die only due natural aging and dying process? -
1) Able to recognize the symptoms of a dease at an earlier/initial stage, without fail, so that patients need not undergo sufferings, atleast upto before the age of 60.
2) To develope such medicines that would be enough to ensure the health of the fetus through out the growing process and the baby takes birth without been effected by any sort of ailments/handicap.
3) Develop such medicines that would cease the existence of Mental Hospitals, atleast for people below 60 years who all got mentally effected.
4) Develop such effective medicines that would never fail to cure any sort of malfunctions of the organs, without the need of organ transplantation, atleast upto the age of 60 years.
5) Make such advancements that could regenerate limbs of a person who got his limbs mutilated in an accident, as long as the person is below 60 years of age.
That is, to achieve all the above great advancements atleast for the people below 60 years of age, supposing that from 60 years of age, the wear and tear of the whole body can not be influenced upon.
If medical science attempts and could succeed in achieving the above, atleast upto the age of 60 years of a human, that would be the most desirable progress for the betterment of human survival.
I used to tell my mother when I was young.."why couldnt we humans have a cocoon and hang the cocoon on some tree and pick up the baby 9 months later"
Prime of youth!!! Then forget about 'mother' and natural birth... Man has to create a body and think of bringing it to life! ound:
Y only 16?Nice idea, but I don't the level of bonding between parent and child will be the same. For mammals the bonding continues even after birth. For humans, maybe all the way to 16 years?
But you wrote 'prime youth', Biswa Sir!! :typing:.............. But really, what I am suggesting may not be too far fetched. A calf or a horse foal can stand on its own legs a few minutes after birth. All fish can swim right away. So it appears that if Nature (or God) wants an animal to be born mature, it can think of a way.