the matter went and landed on the table of the Medical Council ultimately. After studying the material presented and after each member of the council examining the patient the following conclusions were recorded for appropriate action:
1. the diagnosis done at the beginning is absolutely poor in quality. The doctor who did it may be asked to appear before the council. If his certificates were found to be genuine the licence given to the college which taught and trained him may be cancelled and the Doctor advised to join a fresh course and get a fresh credential for practicing. At present he is a risk to the society at large.
2. the referral level Doctor who did the differential diagnosis has done a good job. We recommend that she be given an appropriate recognition certificate.
3. The patient may follow the advice of the referral level doctor may go to his favorite temple/church/dargah and thank God that he has such good doctors too in the world.
LOL.
Dear Mr Vaagmi
You come across as one angry person in this post and the humor used to mask that is botched by the underlying anger I think
I like reading your post when it debating on points rather than putting people down as in this post.
I apologize upfront if it is not proper to say such things in this forum