Nemmara Pattar
Member
"I think all the problems started when the Varna group started disrespecting each other and hell broke loose cos it was not meant to be based on superiority. The Shankaracharya of Puri however adds that Varna of a Brahmin in Dwapara yuga allowed a child born from a Brahmin father and Kshatriya mother to be classified as a Brahmin." -- Srimathi Renuka, Gold Member.
Based on the principle of non-superiority, would it be logical and fair to say that sandals and shoes can be worn on the head and turbans and caps on the feet, that shoulders can take on the task of supporting the thorax from the thighs, that toes can be substituted for fingers, and so on and so forth? Extending the analogy, can the skin take over from the eyes, the ears take over from the tongue, the nose take over from the mouth?
Has the learned and highy-revered Puri-Shankarachaarya confirmed that Manu Smrithi is wrong and that in the Dvaapara-yugam a child born to a Kshathriya father and a Brahmin mother is not a chandaala?
Thanks.
S Narayanaswamy Iyer
Based on the principle of non-superiority, would it be logical and fair to say that sandals and shoes can be worn on the head and turbans and caps on the feet, that shoulders can take on the task of supporting the thorax from the thighs, that toes can be substituted for fingers, and so on and so forth? Extending the analogy, can the skin take over from the eyes, the ears take over from the tongue, the nose take over from the mouth?
Has the learned and highy-revered Puri-Shankarachaarya confirmed that Manu Smrithi is wrong and that in the Dvaapara-yugam a child born to a Kshathriya father and a Brahmin mother is not a chandaala?
Thanks.
S Narayanaswamy Iyer