Dear Mr.Sangom,
You said that we should not blame the super rich in our community for the ills, according to your
version, perceived by me. Thank you for your comments.
Do you think that you are the only person helping his wife in her daily chores. No dear almost all
of us are helping our homemakers in one way or other. Dont say all others are unable to control
their wifes.
Mr. Narasimhan,
I did not say anything specifically directed against your good self or your family; I was giving my observations about the world around me. In our area, a housemaid works in many houses and the conditions vary from one house to another. I know for a fact a few families here in which the wife does not do any kitchen work; in one such household, the wife just does preparing coffee and that too mainly for herself. The rest of the kitchen work is done by the husband, a bank officer and the son, an engineering student. The breakfast and lunch are supplied by a tabra woman who supplies to many houses; the evening tiffin is invariably bought from the nearby hoyel and for the night meals they depend on this hotel again or purchase chapathis from bakery. If any function comes, like even giving vettilai-pAkku to ladies during navarathri, a cook is called for preparing the chundal etc., and the cook gets paid whatever she demands.
If you don't have such households within your knowledge, it does not mean that the entire world will not have. Similarly, when I said middle-class housewives, it should have been clear to you that I am one step below this middle class, yet you say that I am
"living in a castle high above in a highraise building", strange!!
Improving ones economic status is the result of that person's hard work, and not due to one factor or other. Kindly let me know those factors you referred to.
This reveals that your only agenda is possibly an animosity towards me, though both of us are unknown to each other. I am taking the trouble of replying to this post of "tirades" against me butI have decided not to respond to any more posts from you, sir.
I quote my words below:
"As more and more people are improving their economic status, due to one factor or another, we do not have "widows" wh were kept aloof and could earn a small livelihood from cooking for a fee, and similar occupations. Today women have changed a lot; for example does anyone compel his/her daughter to cook when she is around ten? No. The daughter grows up as unaware of household chores, as the son and she starts earning very high salary by the time she is 22 or 23 or even earlier."
Your query, asking me to let you know the factors, looks rather silly, but just to needle me into a position where possibly I will not have answers. Well, let me list out some specific cases and this will be lengthy.
1. One poor widowed woman who used to go from house to house, cook, prepare dosa/idli mAvu grinding in the old "ATTukkal", prepare kai muRukku for household and also occasions like pooNal, marriage, etc., gave one of her 3 daughters to a boy from another similar family. This boy, his widowed sister/(s?) and their mother now carry on the muRukku and other snacks making business as a household industry with government subsidy, bank finance and also the goodwill of one of their sambandhis who was well-known here as "muRu**** Iyer". This gentleman expired and his children have now jointly expanded the household's traditional muRukku-making and ventured into making many kinds of bhakshaNams, packing and labelling them (all with the help of government subsidies-cum-bank loans; they are quite well-off now and own a car, bike, delivery auto, own house etc. Our mAmi has been graciously accommodated by her son-in-law and she does not go for any outside jobs now.
2. One tabra mAmi who used to go for casual help in cooking, bhakshaNam-making etc., has her husband and only son both poojaris in two different temples, in two separate places. Her only daughter loved a tabra stategovernment servant and married him; he is now, luckily, in a very influential and highly paying job and has helped his MIL to purchase a small agraharam house. The two poojaris are getting very good daily incomes and the whole family has moved financially up. That mAmi now cooks for two or three houses and gets about Rs. 3000/= to Rs.6000/= p.m. She has therefore stopped going for casual, one-day help in other houses.
3. One young girl who was going for such assistance got married to a well-placed boy somewhere in Coimbatore or so, and she is now not available.
4. There are two sisters who still are ready to come for one day assistance in the kitchen, but the younger one has been employed by a famous surgen as whole time cook in his house; she gets a very high monthly salary but the condition is that she should stay in the surgeon's houde 24x7. The elder sister is so busy because she is a good cook that she goes, on an average, to more than twenty houses a day, prepares as per menu and just keeps the items on the dining table and goes to the next house. When my wife enquired whether she will be able to come and assis my wife for a sumangali praarthanai in our house, this lady profusely apologized and said that she can, at best, spare one hour or so, that too very early in the morning only and so it is better that my wife did not depend on her for a function like sumangali praarthanai cooking.
These are a few of the examples I had in mind when I wrote that "more and more people are improving their economic status, due to one factor or another" and hence "we do not have "widows" nowadays who were kept aloof and could earn a small livelihood from cooking for a fee, and similar occupations." I hope your good self is now convinced of what I meant to say.
You further goes on to say that sons and daughters are earning very high salary. Do you want those sons and daughters to pay those who do little work and demand more money. If you have any one working in an IT company you please ask him/her if he/she could earn easy money from their employers. In IT firms it is the employers who dictate terms and conditions to the receivers,
whereas in the case of cooks whom you pity a lot, are dictating terms and conditions.
Did you know the difference now.
I am aware, from what other people say, that IT people have to do very hard work for the salaries they earn. My distant cousin has his son in IT earning around Rs.3 lakhs or so (I came to know from another source, not from my cousin) per month. This son and his wife, a doctor are earning so well that they are compelling my cousin not to come to Trivandrum and live in his own built small house. They are very lavish and are not at all stingy when it comes to spending their hard-earned money; in fact they have bought a third posh car and appointed a driver also so that the parents (my cousin and his wife) will be able to go anywhere they want when both the son and DIL go out for work during the weekdays.
I therefore feel that the young IT people may also not mind when it comes to the question of paying a cook. But in reality, I did not at all touch on this aspect. Here is what I wrote in my post #5:
"Today women have changed a lot; for example does anyone compel his/her daughter to cook when she is around ten? No. The daughter grows up as unaware of household chores, as the son and she starts earning very high salary by the time she is 22 or 23 or even earlier."
I was referring to the daughters of mAmis who in earlier days used to go for cooking assistance; the daughters of many such சமையல்காற மாமிs are now earning very well and they do not normally allow their mother to toil any more. I think the question of how hard these daughters work in IT to earn their high salaries is not relevant to this, unless your good self holds the contrary view; then of course, I may have to agree with you because your post reminds me of the adage, "The king can make no mistake".
"You goes on to say that there are vaadhyars who could arrange cooks and all other preparations.
I think you are living in a castle high above in a highraise building. Please come down and see the
world around you. The nexus between vaadhyars and cooks are well known to everybody except
you."
If you say that
"you goes on...", I have to agree because of the adage I referred to above. But in our place we have vaadhyaars who arrange for சமையல்காற மாமிs at very reasonable rates (which even poor tabras like myself can afford to pay) and even if there is a nexus or "cut" or 'kickback', I think our function will go on and get completed smoothly. I sincerely feel that we are living in two different worlds but the one who is in a castle and opines like a baron seems to be not myself.
Atlast you suggest to poor tabras to either dispense with such functions or find some help from
neighbours,or relatives as if relatives are there to help them. Your suggestion
You have left your "geethOpadESam" in the midway. But yes, I feel if one cannot afford to celebrate a religious function because he/she is poor, it is always better to forego that function. And it is exactly because my meagre pension does not permit me, that I did not celebrate (nor did my FIL) shashtyabdapoorthy, nor did I think of going to Thirukkadavoor, nor have I thought of doing the bheema-rathi saanthi etc.