• This forum contains old posts that have been closed. New threads and replies may not be made here. Please navigate to the relevant forum to create a new thread or post a reply.
  • Welcome to Tamil Brahmins forums.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our Free Brahmin Community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

நான் ஒரு இந்து Outstanding article by Kannadasan.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Dear Vaggmi,

I have only a limited thinking capacity. I am not able to understand the reason for the constant debates/arguments based on caste feelings in this site.

I am sure, there may be more persons wondering just as I do.

To my understanding, the tamil brahmin community in the past lost to manipulative forces. They lost their prominence in Tamil Nadu. They are shunned away from government employment opportunities. Okay.

The Tamil brahmin community learn to live with those situations and moved on. Even a person like me who grew up in a village knew what was in store for me due to the name of the caste declared in my S.S.L.C book ( funny enough, I don't even know about my birth. I could have belonged to any caste, but not a brahmin caste since only few families lived there. A brahmin baby could not have vanished without others knowing about it). But anyway, I moved on. so did so many brahmin kids I knew.

Amoung the brahmin kids I know, almost all of them took up employments in various fields. I know a couple ended up as peons, one ended up as a catering contractor, one ended up junior engineer, one scientist. I ended up a tradie. We just moved on. In my village, there was no discrimination in any of the brahmin houses even when I was a kid.

So, what is demanded from the present day brahmin community? I can't really understand the demand at all.

I noticed you are one person who replies tirelessly to everyone. I am clearly ignored by few persons here. That is okay. But I am not asking them since I don't want to be ignored.

so, dear Vaggmi, kindly spare some time to explain what is demanded from the Tamil Brahmin community? Why the present Tamil brahmin community is seen as villains by few of the posters in this forum? Is there any way to change such point of views? Although I can not say for sure I belong to Tamil Brahmin community, still I like to know, please. If you think I am just being nosy, that could be case too. I am really curios though. Thank you.

Cheers!
 
....
.... Even a person like me who grew up in a village knew what was in store for me due to the name of the caste declared in my S.S.L.C book ( funny enough, I don't even know about my birth. I could have belonged to any caste, but not a brahmin caste since only few families lived there. A brahmin baby could not have vanished without others knowing about it). But anyway, I moved on. so did so many brahmin kids I knew.

!

hi raghy,

you have opened up an intriguing window of curiosity through this small visibility into the mysteries of your birth. a great opening to a great story,i would imagine.

is it something like an abandoned baby, adopted by the whole agraharam or other community? and for want of parentage identification, defaulted to a sslc certifcated brahmin?

i have another book which is waiting for me to read வெட்டுப்புலி by தமிழ்மகன். below is the url for a wonderful review of the same by venkat saminathan. of late, there are books in tamil, reviewing the socio history of tamils for the past century, and it is fascinating how the other communities view us. whether we agree with it or not, is a different question, the final waves of which, we see sometimes in this forum or such like places.

வெட்டுப்புலி: திராவிட இயக்க அரசியல் சார்ந்த முதல் இலக்கியப் பதிவு

we tend to godify our culture, i think. we are unable to look at critically at the past, pick out the good and the bad. mostly we deny the bad, and glorify the good. this is not only among tambrams, but also among dravidian reformists or at the national level of india. a biography is a hagiography or a paen, full of praises often godlike, that we forget that the human element in the person.

venkat saminathan, whom i admire a lot, has written a view of this book, which has stung so many dravidianists, that i was surprised. to me it is an excellent review. i quote a few parts of the book, excerpted in the review, to give you a flavour. what it describes is the dynamism and interaction between the castes and how it progressed over the century.

the most ironic statement is made by a DK sympathetic brahmin from new york...which too i have printed below. that perhaps describes many of my generation, who deep in their heart, felt the injustices of the caste system, the responsibility of the brahmin establishment, and the sad fact, that acknowledgement of reforms would adversely impact them and their children. for economic and social purposes it was best to emigrate......dont know how many would have thought it out so coherently. but deep inside they knew. (to bedoing the right thing)

பத்திருபது அய்யர்மார்கள் இருந்த அக்கிரஹாரம், இப்போது இரண்டு மூன்று பேர் கொண்ட அகரமாகக் குறுகிவிட்டது அந்த முப்பதுகளிலேயே. அவர்கள் ஒரு பொருட்டே இல்லை. முப்பதுகளில் மற்ற இடங்களில் சுதந்திரப் போராட்டம் பெரும் கொந்தளிப்பாக இருக்கலாம்.

ஆனால் ஜெகநாதபுரத்தின் தசரத ரெட்டிக்கு அது “உபயமத்த வேலை”. அது, ஜமீந்தார்களும், அங்கு ஒரு மணி ஐயர் கணக்குப் பிள்ளையாகவும், குதிரைமேல் சவாரி செய்து வெள்ளைக்காரன் வருவதுமான காலம். விவசாயம் செய்யும் ரெட்டியார்கள். ஆனால் நாமம் போட்டு வைணவர்களானால் நாயக்கர்கள்… இன்னும் சற்றுத் தள்ளி தெற்கே போனால் படையாச்சி. மதராஸ் பக்கம் போய் ”ரெட்டியார்னு சொன்னா தெலுங்கனான்னு கேக்கறான்,”… என்று இப்படி சாதி பற்றிய பிரக்ஞைதான் முன்னிற்கிறது.

“ஏங்க, ஐயருங்கள திட்டுறதை விட்டுட்டு நாமளும் அவங்க மாதிரி ஆனா என்னாங்க?”

“அதெல்லாம் நடக்ககூடிய காரியம் இல்லடி!”

“நாமளும் நாமம் போட்டுக்கிட்டு தயிர் சாதம் சாப்பிடணும், அவ்வளவு தானே?”

பதில் சொல்லாது அவன் திசைதிருப்பவே, ஹேமா கேட்கிறாள் திரும்பவும்.

“நான் சொன்னதுக்கு பதிலைச் சொல்லுங்க. அவங்க மாதிரி சுத்தபத்தமாக இருக்க முடியலைன்னு தானே அவங்க மேலெ பொறாமை?”

“அடி செருப்பாலே”.. மென்ற வெற்றிலைச் சாறை ‘பிளிச்’சென அவள் முகத்தில் துப்பினான். ”பைத்தியக்காரி… முட்டாள்… தயிர் சாதம் சாப்பிட்டா நீயும் ஐயர் ஆயிடுவியா? கலெக்டர் ஆயிடுவியா?, ஜட்ஜ் ஆயிடுவியா?” ஆத்திரம் தாளாமல் அப்படியே இழுத்து முதுகில் நாலு சாத்து சாத்தினான்


......................



நாயுடு என்று சொன்னார்கள். தமிழ் தெரியாது தெலுங்கு பேசுகிறவள். ஐயரு இல்லாம செய்துகிட்ட சீர்திருத்த மணம். அவளையும் தன்னைப் போல் பெரியார் பக்தையாக்கிவிட முயன்றால், அவள் “எல்லாரையும் சமமா பாக்கணும்னு சொல்றீங்க… அப்புறம் இது வேறே அது வேறேனு சொல்றீங்க.

எதுக்கு இந்தப் பித்தலாட்டம்கறா? என்று அவனுக்கு எரிச்சல். கடைசியில் திராவிட இயக்கக் கொள்கைதான் இதற்கு பதில் சொல்லி மனம் சமாதானமடையச் செய்யும் போலிருக்கிறது.

“தன்னைப் பழி வாங்க பார்ப்பனர் செய்த சதி போல இருந்தது அவனுக்கு மனைவி வாய்த்தது.” பிரச்சினை எதுவாக இருந்தாலும் பாப்பானைத் திட்டினால் பிரசினை தீர்ந்துவிடுவதாகத் தோன்றுகிறது.

வீட்டில் மாத்திரம் இல்லை. அவன் வேலை செய்யும் ஏஜீஸ் ஆபீஸிலும் அவனுக்கு எதிரான பார்ப்பன சதிதான்.

அவன் ஆபீஸில் ஒரு பார்ப்பனர் நாடகங்கள் போடுவதிலும் சினிமாவுக்கு வசனங்கள் எழுதுவதிலும் ஈடுபட்டிருந்ததை அறிந்ததும், அதுவும் அவன் தன் ரேங்கில் இருப்பவன், அவன் எம் ஜி ஆர் படங்களுக்கு வசனம் எழுதும் அளவுக்குப் போனது, அவனுக்குத் தாளமுடியாத ஆத்திரமாக வந்தது. இதுவும் பார்ப்பன சதி இல்லாமல் வேறென்ன?

அவனை யாரோ ஒரு பார்ப்பான் என்று உதறி எறியவும் முடியவில்லை. அந்த பாப்பானுக்கு ஒரு ரசிகர் கூட்டம் வேறெ. “பால சந்தர் படம்” என்று புகழ் பரவியது. அடுத்தடுத்து அந்த பாப்பான் வளர்ந்து கொண்டே போனால்? நாணல், எதிர் நீச்சல், பாமா விஜயம், மேஜர் சந்திரகாந்த், சர்வர் சுந்தரம் என்று அந்த வளர்ச்சி பெரிய தலைவலியாக இருந்தது. அவர் பெயரை “பால சந்திரனோ, பால சுந்தரமோ என்று தெனாவட்டாக உச்சரிப்பான்.

”என் கூட வேலை செஞ்ச பய” என்று சொல்வான். பின் ”என் கீழே வேலை செஞ்சவன்” என்றும் சொல்லிப் பார்த்தான்..

லட்சுமண ரெட்டியார் திராவிடக் கழக அனுதாபி, அப்பப்போ படிப்பகம் அது இது என்று உதவுவதோடு நிற்பவர். அவர் தன் குடும்பத்தையே ஒன்றும் செய்ய முடிந்ததில்லை. அவர்கள் சம்பிரதாயத்திலேயே மூழ்கியவர்களாக இருந்தார்கள். இன்னும் ஏதாவது செய்யலாம் என்று தீவிர கழகக்காரரான மணி நாயுடுவை அண்டலாம் என்றால் அவர் சாராயக் கடையை ஏலம் எடுப்பதிலும் கவர்ன்மெண்ட் காண்டிராக்ட் ஏலம் எடுக்க அரசுத் தரகர்களுக்கு லஞ்சம் தருபவராக மாறிப்போனதால் அந்தத் தொடர்பும் விட்டுப் போகிறது.

முன்னர் ஜஸ்டீஸ் பார்ட்டியிலிருந்த சௌந்திர பாண்டிய நாடாரும் இதில் வருகிறார். பெரியார் திடலில் லட்சுமண ரெட்டியாரைச் சந்திக்கிறார். ‘நாடார் குல மித்ரன்’ என்ற பத்திரிகையின் பழைய இதழைப் படிக்கிறார். அதில் பெரியார் காங்கிரஸில் இருந்த போது ஹிந்து-முஸ்லீம் ஒற்றுமையைப் பற்றியும் பேசுகிறார்.

ஸ்ரீமான் காவ்ய கண்ட கணபதி சாஸ்திரிகள் வரவேற்புரை அளிக்க, ஸ்ரீமான் ராமாசாமி நாயக்கர் அக்கிராசனராகிறார். காந்தியடிகள் உண்ணாவிரதம் வெற்றியடைய கடவுளைப் பிரார்த்திக்கிறார். ஜஸ்டிஸ் கட்சி ஒழிய நாள் தோறும் பிரார்த்தனை செய்து வருவதாகவும் சொல்கிறார். லட்சுமண ரெட்டியார் பெரியாரிடம் மரியாதை வைத்திருப்பவர். நாடார் குல மித்ரனில் தப்புத் தப்பாகப் போட்டிருக்கிறானோ என்று கேட்கிறார் சௌந்திர பாண்டிய நாடாரை.

லட்சுமண ரெட்டியார் சின்னா ரெட்டி வெட்டுபுலி காலத்தில் சின்னப் பையன். இப்போது தாத்தாவாகிவிட்டவர்.


..........................


அந்த சங்கராச்சாரியாரை ஜெயலலிதா அரெஸ்ட் செய்ய முடிகிறது. கலைஞரால் முடியவில்லையே. என்று கேட்கிறார் நியூயார்க் வந்திருக்கும் திமுக-கார அப்பா வளர்த்த தமிழ்ச் செல்வனை.

”சட்ட சபை எங்க கையிலே இல்லை. நீதித்துறை எங்க கையிலே இல்லை. நிர்வாகமும் எங்க கையிலே இல்லை பாப்பான் உட்கார்ந்திருந்த இடமெல்லாம் இப்ப அவங்க கையிலே. ராஜாஜி இல்லே. வரதாச்சாரி இல்லே. ஆமாவா இல்லையா?”

எங்களைத்தான் நாட்டை விட்டே வெரட்டி அடிச்சுட்டாங்களே. இந்தக் கோட்டா, அந்தக் கோட்டா, ரிசர்வேஷன்னு.. செரி அதை வுடு. க்ஷேமமாத்தான் இருக்கோம். இல்லாட்டிப் போனா அங்கே தான் கோயில்லே மணி அடிச்சிட்டு இருக்கணும்…” என்று சொல்லிக் கொண்டு வந்தவர் தமிழ்ச்செல்வனைக் கேட்கிறார். ”அம்மாவும் பெரியார் கட்சியா?” என்று. தமிழ்ச் செல்வன் சிரித்துக்கொண்டே சொல்கிறான். ”இல்லை பேர் தான் நாகம்மா. ஆனால் சாய் பக்தை” என்கிறான்.


i feel the current schism between tambrams and NBs in tamil nadu could have been avoided, had the tambram leaders in the 1920s through 40s, correctly understood the power of democracy and negotiations. This would have meant sharing of jobs in government and colleges, and this obsession with 'merit' ie marks, meant take all or nothing. and it has left us with nothing.

again, barring s.v.shekar, none of the tambrams in positions of influence, like cho vikatan hindu, support a call for government support for the poorest of our community. maybe even the middle class does not want it. because for our traditions to continue we need brahmin cooks, household help and for the final journey to the crematorium/obsequies. unless you have a poor underbelly, how will these functions be served? eh?
 
Last edited:
.... I am clearly ignored by few persons here. That is okay. But I am not asking them since I don't want to be ignored.
Raghy, speaking strictly on my own behalf, which is all I am entitled to and no more, I tend not to engage you because your perspective seems rooted firmly and strictly on your own person experiences. Within the scope of your personal experience there is not much room for critical discussion. Who can contradict the reality of your personal experiences to you? There can be room for meaningful discussion only if you can go beyond your personal experiences and into the realm of general principles and objectives and how they can be advanced. My view encompases (i) we all are equal and entitled to certain basic human rights among them are right to lead a dignified and decent life, (ii) righting historical oppression must be addressed and the society must progress towards a more equal and just dispensation, and (iii) this process is not going to be without certain price to be paid by the dominant class and that is worth it for the society as a whole just as long as the aggregate good more than compensates for the aggregate cost. Your view as I understand is nobody known to you must suffer any loss even if it means many more people whom you don't know will benefit immensely. With such clear lines drawn all we can do is to leave each other to our own views.

so, dear Vaggmi, kindly spare some time to explain what is demanded from the Tamil Brahmin community?
Shri Vaagmi has expressed himself to be proud of his Brahmin heritage and has been quite disparaging of any opinion or individual critical of Brahminism. Therefore, asking him to explain what is demanded of TB by those oppose Brahminism is quite meaningless. The answer you will get is going to be self serving at best. If you are honestly interested in understanding what others expect from TBs you need to ask those who are critical of TB. You may or many not agree with their view, but to ask the Brahmin diehards what others expect of Brahmins seems a pointless waste of time.
 
< snipped >
so, dear Vaggmi, kindly spare some time to explain what is demanded from the Tamil Brahmin community? Why the present Tamil brahmin community is seen as villains by few of the posters in this forum? Is there any way to change such point of views? Although I can not say for sure I belong to Tamil Brahmin community, still I like to know, please. If you think I am just being nosy, that could be case too. I am really curios though. Thank you.

Cheers!

Dear Shri Raghy,

In regard to your above request to Shri Vagmi sir, I wholeheartedly endorse Shri Nara's views in his post # 128 above. Even so, I give below my views on the issue mentioned by you.

Since you have been around even before I joined this Forum, it will be clear to you that what I expect from members like Vagmi and others is that we, the tabras of today, need not (and therefore, should not) feel shy, humiliated or that our prestige as a community will get lowered, by admitting that during the period of the Dravidian movement's formation (and the Justice Party's working, before that) the leaders of the tabra community utterly failed to see the way things were taking shape and that their rigid attitude in not allowing other Tamil communities to also share a certain percentage of the government jobs, etc., gave the entire gun-powder supply to the Dravidian movement to completely sweep away the brahmin hegemony in TN and to keep this tabra community completely
marginalized for so long.

Our friends seem to oppose this very idea on the ground that they individually or their ancestors, did not have any role in any such matters and that, nevertheless, many of them have suffered cruelty at the hands of the Kazhagam activists and hence they cannot but decry that movement and its founder for ever; hence they look at my view as one of "bashing brahmins".

It, therefore, appears to me that our friends on the opposite side disown any caste or community leaders or leadership in the pre-independence era of 1920's to 1940's and that they prefer to hold on to the view that the tabras, during that period, were a perfectly disunited community of poor, weak, innocent individuals, having no leaders of standing at all to protect and further the causes of the community, etc., under the British colonial regime and that the Dravidian movement was a devilish action on such a peace-loving, minuscule and highly fissiparous and reclusive tabra community, to achieve some diabolical ends.

The above according to me is the difference in the two opposing view points here, in this forum. I think neither side wants anything to be done by the Tamil Brahmin community, today, if we are looking at the macro-community. All the friction and sparks in this Forum is limited only in getting Shri Vagmi's side to acknowledge that if the Kazhagam movement was indeed a mindless diabolical attack on an innocent and minuscule brahmin caste without any valid basis for its anti-brahmin agenda, as is sought to be made out by their side, then such a movement could not have achieved this amount of success and got democratic powers of such long-standing nature.

According to me the tabra community leaders of those times probably failed to visualize the power of numerical strength in a democratic and free India which was within sight; they probably thought that freedom would not be achieved by India so soon and that the caste-bound hindu social set-up coming down from antiquity and the importance and veneration of brahmins by all the other castes, which had been an integral part of that hoary hindu social set-up, would continue for much longer time, with the British acting as the overlords. This was what made them indifferent to the demand of job-sharing (which meant power-sharing as well, in those days) with all other castes in TN.
 
Reference post#126 by Raghy.
Dear Vaggmi,

I am not able to understand the reason for the constant debates/arguments based on caste feelings in this site. I am sure, there may be more persons wondering just as I do.To my understanding, the tamil brahmin community in the past lost to manipulative forces. They lost their prominence in Tamil Nadu. They are shunned away from government employment opportunities. Okay.
Your these opening statements are just on the spot. Just a small difference there between what you have understood and what I have understood. There was no prominence in Tamilnadu for Brahmins. They were either respected or treated just like any one else or like dust in the village depending on how rich they were. A poor Brahmin without any landholdings was just inconsequential in the midst of the middle caste hindus in the village. The denial of Government jobs to Brahmins was a serious issue upto a point in time. But Brahmins quickly learnt to live without Government jobs. Because they were quick to learn they were preferred in the British ruled India. But with peoples’ govt. in place quick learning of a different type is required and Brahmins are unable to come up to the expected efficiency levels in that. So the one half of a percent jobs that they may get after all reservations also goes past them. Now it is Brahmins who shun the Government jobs-even the IAS babu’s positions. I am here in India and I know what is happening here. When my daughter was ready for a job I thought she would take the Civil Services exam. But she was not keen about it as she was aware of what that job is about.

The Tamil brahmin community learnt to …………………I ended up a tradie. We just moved on. In my village, there was no discrimination in any of the brahmin houses even when I was a kid.
So, what is demanded from the present day brahmin community? I can't really understand the demand at all.
Brahmins do not discriminate. In my house when I lived in the village too there never was any discrimination. Of course every day we did not go about kissing every middle caste boy or girl walking on the street. We always kept our personal space which we keep even now. I am sure even the diehard arm chair intellectuals who wax eloquent here about the equality at birth would also meticulously maintain their private space inviolable. If they deny you can take it that it is just plain lie.

I noticed you are one person who replies tirelessly to everyone. I am clearly ignored by few persons here. That is okay. But I am not asking them since I don't want to be ignored.
so, dear Vaggmi, kindly spare some time to explain what is demanded from the Tamil Brahmin community? Why the present Tamil brahmin community is seen as villains by few of the posters in this forum? Is there any way to change such point of views? Although I can not say for sure I belong to Tamil Brahmin community, still I like to know, please. If you think I am just being nosy, that could be case too. I am really curios though. Thank you.
Now the final important point of your question. What is demanded from Brahmins? My understanding is this:
1)There is nothing special demanded from Brahmins by the countless NBs in Tamilnadu. They do not even know that you are a Brahmin if you walk in the street, work in an office, study in a school/college, eat in a hotel, travel in a bus/train/airplane, stand in a queue in a ration shop to buy your quota of sugar/wheat/rice/palm oil or whatever else, go and pee in pay and use toilet by the road side along with others, go and watch a movie in a theatre or do any such thing which a common does here as a part of his living. They just do not bother just as you just do not bother whether the others are Brahmins or NBs.
2)In his house which is his private space a Brahmin family lives in a particular way which is determined by its own value system and culture as you must be aware. There may be a family which is more orthodox in which the head of the family (HOF) may get up in the early morning and follow a certain strict regimen in his daily life. He may, for instance, take bath in the morning immediately after getting up and then only have his cup of coffee. He may do a pooja after that and then take breakfast before starting his work. After bath until his pooja is over he may not touch any one – this may include his wife, children, father and mother too. Now if this gentle man happens to deal with the milkman who brings him milk every morning, he will naturally keep his dealings without touching the milk man.
3)This Brahmin may be bringing up his children in a particular way with values and cultures of a Brahmin family. Like ahimsa, god fearing, respect for elders, respect for scriptures, love for humanity, humility, contentment etc., He would certainly want his children to live their peacefully after their marriage so that the tradition continues. So he chooses a Brahmin boy or girl as match for his daughter/son to celebrate the marriage. He believes that Brahmin community has some common values and culture. He banks on that truth and so is particular about marriage within the Brahmin community only. Some times he has come across Rakshasas among Brahmins and angels among NBs. But these are generally exceptions. Any way a marriage or a home is a personal space and it is his right to have his say in that and live in that as he (he alone) chooses to live. It is certainly not for others to tell him what he should do at his house or whom he should bring in there as a daughter in law or son in law.
Now if you have understood the point 1 above, you would know that nothing is really expected from Brahmins by the man on the street-the common man irrespective of whether he is a Brahmin or NB. But what about the repeated demands here in this forum-more abaout this later please read further.
But unfortunately the Tamil society is not allowed to remain this simple. Complications come when some people want to organize people in a political party to capture power. When they find that the simple method of a televised debate of economic and security issues (as it happens in other countries) is not helpful, they devise other methods to rally people. They sell the hatred opium liberally because that unites people against-this ‘against’ is the most important fulcrum on which every thing depends-an imaginary enemy. If the enemy is a small helpless identifiable community it is really very nice. Hitler devised this method to capture power and out Tamil politicians perfected it. So they make demands on Brahmins. They here means the handful of crooked individuals with a hidden political agenda. The demands are:
1. Brahmins are responsible for all the atrocities in the name of caste. Their ancestors created intellectual justification to the caste atrocities and practiced it too. So they should now regret it in the way we want them to do it.
2. Brahmins prevented the other communities from coming anywhere near the scriptures. If they had allowed others to learn them they all would have become Brahmins. So Brahmins should own the responsibility for this conspiracy and do atonement in the way we want them do it.
3.Brahmins are practicing exclusivity and untouchability. We would like to touch them freely. We feel insulted when Brahmins refuse to permit us to touch them or when they refuse to touch us. There is no difference between Brahmins and us. Our blood is red and their blood is red. We stand on our legs and they too stand on their legs only. We do bipedal locomotion and they do the same. So we are equal in every respect. Brahmins should accept this and do atonement in the way we want them do it.
Now if this leaves you wondering what exactly is the atonement, prayaschittam, expression of regret etc., are, then read further.
1. Brahmins should not complain loudly if we beat them. They should not complain if we send our goons to their area/houses and indulge in some mischief. This is one way of atonement.
2. They should not complain if we deny them the right to engage is any useful trade, business or employment as a matter of right. We will leave them some crumbs after we take every thing and they should be satisfied with it because that is one way of doing an atonement. We will not allow them to study in colleges or schools as a matter of right even if they have scored the best marks in exams.
3. They should agree in writing to teach us all the scriptures( it is another matter that we are least interested in learning the scriptures because they are useless for us) and make us the pujaris of all the temples in TN.
4. Finally this is the most important demand: Brahmins should give all their daughters in marriage only to our boys and not to any of Brahmin boys. If this demand is met we are ready to even give up all other demands.
Are you now wondering who are the people who are making such demands? Our friends in this forum who are all terribly worked up about Brahmin atrocities, Brahmin intellectual justifications, Brahmin arrogance and add what you want are the people I am talking about. You know who they are here in this forum. If you have still any doubt please check up who are the people who have already answered your question on my behalf. This has become a lengthy post. Please read it leisurely. I have saved my energy by being brief to my interlocuters. LOL
Thanks.
 
hi raghy,

i feel the current schism between tambrams and NBs in tamil nadu could have been avoided, had the tambram leaders in the 1920s through 40s, correctly understood the power of democracy and negotiations. This would have meant sharing of jobs in government and colleges, and this obsession with 'merit' ie marks, meant take all or nothing. and it has left us with nothing.

again, barring s.v.shekar, none of the tambrams in positions of influence, like cho vikatan hindu, support a call for government support for the poorest of our community. maybe even the middle class does not want it. because for our traditions to continue we need brahmin cooks, household help and for the final journey to the crematorium/obsequies. unless you have a poor underbelly, how will these functions be served? eh?

The power of democracy was understood by brahmins well. How to exploit that power to the hilt was not known to them. They were in the vanguard of positive discrimination and took a very bold step to introduce reservation for the SC/ST communities as a matter of inalienable right in the constitution of India. But those crooked Indian citizens who were adept in exploiting every situation to their advantage introduced reservation for the prosperous tormentor middle lump and made the very reservation principle itself a mockery. Please answer this question. Who introduced reservation for a vanniya gounder Anbu chelvan along with a reservation for the son of the maadan a dalit working in his farmlands? The answer will tell you the story of reservation in its true detail. I as a brahmin do not expect any reservation benefit for me, but a reservation to a rich Vanniyar boy(with caste as the only qualification) to study MBBS is a national waste. As an Indian citizen I have the right to oppose it.
 
Raghy, speaking strictly on my own behalf, which is all I am entitled to and no more, I tend not to engage you because your perspective seems rooted firmly and strictly on your own person experiences. Within the scope of your personal experience there is not much room for critical discussion. Who can contradict the reality of your personal experiences to you? There can be room for meaningful discussion only if you can go beyond your personal experiences and into the realm of general principles and objectives and how they can be advanced. My view encompases (i) we all are equal and entitled to certain basic human rights among them are right to lead a dignified and decent life, (ii) righting historical oppression must be addressed and the society must progress towards a more equal and just dispensation, and (iii) this process is not going to be without certain price to be paid by the dominant class and that is worth it for the society as a whole just as long as the aggregate good more than compensates for the aggregate cost. Your view as I understand is nobody known to you must suffer any loss even if it means many more people whom you don't know will benefit immensely. With such clear lines drawn all we can do is to leave each other to our own views.

Shri Vaagmi has expressed himself to be proud of his Brahmin heritage and has been quite disparaging of any opinion or individual critical of Brahminism. Therefore, asking him to explain what is demanded of TB by those oppose Brahminism is quite meaningless. The answer you will get is going to be self serving at best. If you are honestly interested in understanding what others expect from TBs you need to ask those who are critical of TB. You may or many not agree with their view, but to ask the Brahmin diehards what others expect of Brahmins seems a pointless waste of time.

Yes. Please listen to this mahavishnu from US. If he says something it must be true for his knowledge about everything, and me particularly, is flawless. His research thesis is about his pet topic Brahminism and he can tell you what it is-that is if you are able to u nderstand it. LOL. Now I can wait for his calling me an imbecile. LOL.
 
Dear Sri. Vaagmi,

Thank you for the detailed reply in post #131. I read it once. I wold read it at least once more before making any comment on that. I do not live like any Tamil brahmin, for that matter like any brahmin. But I tried to visualise myself as the person in post #131. I could accept some of the points, but not all of them. So, kindly allowme to get back later, please. Thank you.

Kind regards.
 
Raghy, speaking strictly on my own behalf, which is all I am entitled to and no more, I tend not to engage you because your perspective seems rooted firmly and strictly on your own person experiences. Within the scope of your personal experience there is not much room for critical discussion. Who can contradict the reality of your personal experiences to you? There can be room for meaningful discussion only if you can go beyond your personal experiences and into the realm of general principles and objectives and how they can be advanced. My view encompases (i) we all are equal and entitled to certain basic human rights among them are right to lead a dignified and decent life, (ii) righting historical oppression must be addressed and the society must progress towards a more equal and just dispensation, and (iii) this process is not going to be without certain price to be paid by the dominant class and that is worth it for the society as a whole just as long as the aggregate good more than compensates for the aggregate cost. Your view as I understand is nobody known to you must suffer any loss even if it means many more people whom you don't know will benefit immensely. With such clear lines drawn all we can do is to leave each other to our own views.

Shri Vaagmi has expressed himself to be proud of his Brahmin heritage and has been quite disparaging of any opinion or individual critical of Brahminism. Therefore, asking him to explain what is demanded of TB by those oppose Brahminism is quite meaningless. The answer you will get is going to be self serving at best. If you are honestly interested in understanding what others expect from TBs you need to ask those who are critical of TB. You may or many not agree with their view, but to ask the Brahmin diehards what others expect of Brahmins seems a pointless waste of time.

Dear Sri. Nara, Namaskaram.

Thanks for letting me know why you tend not to engage with me in a discussion. I don't think I can do too much about it. I do write my personal experiences as I see when my views are formed from my personal experiences, I see them as evidence based. It is perfectly alright if you may not like to engage with me. I was not grieving about that. I was only looking for some answers. Again, those answers are not for me on the personal basis either. I know I don't discriminate anyone nor my family. I know the family I grew up in the village did not either. I know, I talk my personal experiences. Kindly bear with me, that's all I know.

I did not get the answer I was seeking from your reply though. Your views 1 to 3 are apply to not only Tamil brahmins but also to all the castes all down to Arundhathiyar. I was seeking answers specific to Tamil Brahmin community in this forum only. But thanks for your input. Now that the present Tamil Brahmin community in TN stopped all discrimination, I hope all the other castes stop discrimination too.

I will not use the bogus word 'brahminism'; I like the more honest word " பார்ப்பனீயம் ". Sri. Vaggmi is a பார்ப்பான்; so, it is not wrong to ask his opinion in this too. I should not only ask the persons critical of TB but also the பார்ப்பான் too so that both sides of the coin are hopefully exposed. In that respect I think Sri. Vaagmi's input would be valuable. Thank you.

Kind regards,
 
Last edited:


Dear Shri Raghy,

In regard to your above request to Shri Vagmi sir, I wholeheartedly endorse Shri Nara's views in his post # 128 above. Even so, I give below my views on the issue mentioned by you.

Since you have been around even before I joined this Forum, it will be clear to you that what I expect from members like Vagmi and others is that we, the tabras of today, need not (and therefore, should not) feel shy, humiliated or that our prestige as a community will get lowered, by admitting that during the period of the Dravidian movement's formation (and the Justice Party's working, before that) the leaders of the tabra community utterly failed to see the way things were taking shape and that their rigid attitude in not allowing other Tamil communities to also share a certain percentage of the government jobs, etc., gave the entire gun-powder supply to the Dravidian movement to completely sweep away the brahmin hegemony in TN and to keep this tabra community completely
marginalized for so long.

Our friends seem to oppose this very idea on the ground that they individually or their ancestors, did not have any role in any such matters and that, nevertheless, many of them have suffered cruelty at the hands of the Kazhagam activists and hence they cannot but decry that movement and its founder for ever; hence they look at my view as one of "bashing brahmins".

It, therefore, appears to me that our friends on the opposite side disown any caste or community leaders or leadership in the pre-independence era of 1920's to 1940's and that they prefer to hold on to the view that the tabras, during that period, were a perfectly disunited community of poor, weak, innocent individuals, having no leaders of standing at all to protect and further the causes of the community, etc., under the British colonial regime and that the Dravidian movement was a devilish action on such a peace-loving, minuscule and highly fissiparous and reclusive tabra community, to achieve some diabolical ends.

The above according to me is the difference in the two opposing view points here, in this forum. I think neither side wants anything to be done by the Tamil Brahmin community, today, if we are looking at the macro-community. All the friction and sparks in this Forum is limited only in getting Shri Vagmi's side to acknowledge that if the Kazhagam movement was indeed a mindless diabolical attack on an innocent and minuscule brahmin caste without any valid basis for its anti-brahmin agenda, as is sought to be made out by their side, then such a movement could not have achieved this amount of success and got democratic powers of such long-standing nature.

According to me the tabra community leaders of those times probably failed to visualize the power of numerical strength in a democratic and free India which was within sight; they probably thought that freedom would not be achieved by India so soon and that the caste-bound hindu social set-up coming down from antiquity and the importance and veneration of brahmins by all the other castes, which had been an integral part of that hoary hindu social set-up, would continue for much longer time, with the British acting as the overlords. This was what made them indifferent to the demand of job-sharing (which meant power-sharing as well, in those days) with all other castes in TN.

Dear Sri. Sangom, Namaskaram.

With due respect to your valuable input, I was asking about the expectations of the present day Tamil Brahmin community in this forum only. The present day TB community possibly would not give a hoot about the brahmin leadership of British India period. More over, they don't even care for government jobs anyway. I never bothered to apply to any government job when I was young ( in those days anyone scored over 75% marks in average in S.S.L.C was assured a clerical job in Indian Postal Service irrespective of caste. I was very much encouraged to avail the opportunity. I did not bother).

I don't know why you are mentioning about Kazhagam ( I think you mean Dravida Khazhagam) here. You may have a lot of respect for Khazhgam, but my query did not involve khazhagam.

Kindly pardon me, your answer did not answer my query, sir. Seriously,we can't be having today in the forum for something dead and buried before and just post independence.

Thank you for your input.

Cheers!
 
Last edited:
..I did not get the answer I was seeking from your reply though.
Raghy, I was only trying to explain myself for not engaging you, I didn't know I was trying to provide answers to your questions. Also I am not sure what the questions are, if they are about what is expected of TB, then I have already given my perspective, which, it seems, is not acceptable to you.

I must also note that, based on the response you have given, there is some ambiguity in your question. Whose perspective are you interested in? Do you want to know what others expect from TB, or do you want to know what TBs think the others expect of them? Obviously, the answers will be quite different.

BTW, I don't want to leave you with an impression that my view is that personal experiences are unimportant, not at all. We all are shaped by our personal experiences. My point is, letting only the personal experiences to shape one's world view is not wise.

regards ....
 
Dear Kunjuppu,

I refer to your post #127. I don't think I am going to discuss my personal details in the forum. In the email, may be.

You are right. I felt really bad, poor section of the Tamil Brahmin community is not supported well. Personally although I don't like to restrict myself in a community, I am more than happy to help anyone. Hunger is hunger, no matter who felt it. A dalit hunger is neither superior nor inferior to a brahmin hunger. Be it is hunger for education or for ஒரு ஜான் வயிறு.

The current schism between TBs and the higher caste NBs could not be avoided. The separation was spear headed by jealousy and hatred. The average TB, even when did not have much money, walked around in very clean cloth, spoke English and seemed like he was living well. How many times I showed off with just 5 rupees in my pocket? Do you remember in those days most girls loved to talk to a brahmin guy? Even when I was dressed like a 'coolie' as in Deewar movie, I used to open a conversation with any girl I came across.

I used to have a friend in Newmarket, ON who had hatred for brahmins. He said that openly to me. But he became very close to me. I used to cook in his home and serve dinner to him and his wife.. he admitted most NBs hated brahmins out of jealousy.

I read Swaminathan's review. I really would like to discuss the comments. Did you read the comments by 'Anjan Kumar' aka சுடலை? I shall get back about வெட்டு புலி.

Cheers!
 
Yes. Please listen to this mahavishnu from US.

Dear Vaagmi ji,

Wow! I am surprised or shall I say shocked that you are using the word Mahavishnu here with hints of sarcasm.

Sometimes I can not understand you..I see in this thread you are a warrior that defends Brahmins(no harm in that..its your birthright) but I dont know why you dont want to defend Lord Vishnu with all that might but choose to use His name in a sarcastic manner.

So I guess that caste is greater than God??LOL
 
Last edited:
Raghy, I was only trying ................ is not acceptable to you.

I must also note that, based on the response you have given, there is some ambiguity in your question. Whose perspective are you interested in? Do you want to know what others expect from TB, or do you want to know what TBs think the others expect of them? Obviously, the answers will be quite different.

What about the perspective of those TBs who do not want to be TBs and of TBs who prefers to stay TBs, and those who think they are TBs but their views are not TB views. This is like the pratama pratyaksham which has been washed again and again, rinsed again again, dried again and again and pressed again again for presentation. The question is simple unlike the pratamapratyaksham. What is expected of brahmins is the question and the brahmin members here understand its meaning well. LOL.
 
Dear Vaagmi ji,

Wow! I am surprised or shall I say shocked that you are using the word Mahavishnu here with hints of sarcasm.Sometimes I can not understand you..I see in this thread you are a warrior that defends Brahmins(no harm in that..its your birthright) but I dont know why you dont want to defend Lord Vishnu with all that might but choose to use His name in a sarcastic manner.
So I guess that caste is greater than God??LOL

Dont be so surprised. You may swoon and that is not good for a Doctor. Mahavishnu is sarvajnan or omniscient. That settles the issue. If there can be a mount road mahavishnu, there can be a US mahavishnu too. Vishnu does not need any one defending him. US vishnu or a mt road version may need.

If you are familiar with Vishnu you should be aware that there is a tradition there in which the bhaktas play with him. There are Azhwars who have done that. There are other bhaktas who have done that. So this poor vaagmi has just followed their example. LOL.
 
dear raghi,

what i do while i am in toronto, is to keep abreast of as much of tamil literary scene and blog scene. the bloggers whom i like most are the young ones, almost all of them NB (hate that word but how else to classify somebody?), who are fair about brahmins. they dont have residual hatred, but at the same time, strong against brahminism, ie same things that i dont like about the past.

the good thing is these started as reformists, and now, more or less indepdendent thinkers.

jothiji, athisha, vaa manikandan, cable shankar, krpsenthil, adrasakka, arurmunasenthil, badri, jeyamohan etc, are some of them. gnani i follow though of late i find him too dogmatic. also for sheer curiosity i follow pmk mallars arundhathiyars and such, just to see what their thinking is. (its bad :()

i also buy books online and save them at my aunt's and pick them up on my visit to chennai. right now i have 8 books waiting to be picked up. :) one of them is வெட்டு புலி. if you google வெட்டு புலி reviews, you will see reviews by other bloggers too. what i was surprised was the intensity of venkat and his detractors. amazing how any topic gets diverted to the B/NB divide, isn't it?

i read a lot especially online. and would love to discuss it any day. past two days the biggest storm was raised by jeyamohan article in tamil hindu, suggesting we replace tamil script with roman, when writing the language :) amount of action hatred response..simply amazing.

ஆங்கில எழுத்துருவில் தமிழை எழுதினால் என்ன?
 
Dear Sri. Vaggmi,

I refer to your post #131. Since it was quite long, I am posting my views in two posts. Mind you, please... I am posting my vies only. I can be very wrong. I will be happy to correct myself.

Now the final important point of your question. What is demanded from Brahmins? My understanding is this:
1)There is nothing special demanded from Brahmins by the countless NBs in Tamilnadu. They do not even know that you are a Brahmin if you walk in the street, work in an office, study in a school/college, eat in a hotel, travel in a bus/train/airplane, stand in a queue in a ration shop to buy your quota of sugar/wheat/rice/palm oil or whatever else, go and pee in pay and use toilet by the road side along with others, go and watch a movie in a theatre or do any such thing which a common does here as a part of his living. They just do not bother just as you just do not bother whether the others are Brahmins or NBs.
2)In his house which is his private space a Brahmin family lives in a particular way which is determined by its own value system and culture as you must be aware. There may be a family which is more orthodox in which the head of the family (HOF) may get up in the early morning and follow a certain strict regimen in his daily life. He may, for instance, take bath in the morning immediately after getting up and then only have his cup of coffee. He may do a pooja after that and then take breakfast before starting his work. After bath until his pooja is over he may not touch any one – this may include his wife, children, father and mother too. Now if this gentle man happens to deal with the milkman who brings him milk every morning, he will naturally keep his dealings without touching the milk man.
3)This Brahmin may be bringing up his children in a particular way with values and cultures of a Brahmin family. Like ahimsa, god fearing, respect for elders, respect for scriptures, love for humanity, humility, contentment etc., He would certainly want his children to live their peacefully after their marriage so that the tradition continues. So he chooses a Brahmin boy or girl as match for his daughter/son to celebrate the marriage. He believes that Brahmin community has some common values and culture. He banks on that truth and so is particular about marriage within the Brahmin community only. Some times he has come across Rakshasas among Brahmins and angels among NBs. But these are generally exceptions. Any way a marriage or a home is a personal space and it is his right to have his say in that and live in that as he (he alone) chooses to live. It is certainly not for others to tell him what he should do at his house or whom he should bring in there as a daughter in law or son in law.
Now if you have understood the point 1 above, you would know that nothing is really expected from Brahmins by the man on the street-the common man irrespective of whether he is a Brahmin or NB.


Dear Sri. Vaggmi,

Not only Tamil Brahmin community, but other communities too like to have matrimony within their community for all practical purposes. Granted, due to exposure to youngsters from other communities, the youngsters today like to venture seeking partners from other communities. Success rate depends upon many factors just like any arranged marriages anyway. Marriages don’t really have 100% success rate.

So, the quoted portion from you, although written from a Tamil Brahmin’s point of view is only a general view that can be applied to persons from any caste or any religion. For example, do you really think a Muslim would be any different? Possibly not.

But what about the repeated demands here in this forum-more about this later please read further.
But unfortunately the Tamil society is not allowed to remain this simple. Complications come when some people want to organize people in a political party to capture power. When they find that the simple method of a televised debate of economic and security issues (as it happens in other countries) is not helpful, they devise other methods to rally people. They sell the hatred opium liberally because that unites people against-this ‘against’ is the most important fulcrum on which every thing depends-an imaginary enemy. If the enemy is a small helpless identifiable community it is really very nice. Hitler devised this method to capture power and out Tamil politicians perfected it. So they make demands on Brahmins. They here means the handful of crooked individuals with a hidden political agenda. The demands are:
1. Brahmins are responsible for all the atrocities in the name of caste. Their ancestors created intellectual justification to the caste atrocities and practiced it too. So they should now regret it in the way we want them to do it.
2. Brahmins prevented the other communities from coming anywhere near the scriptures. If they had allowed others to learn them they all would have become Brahmins. So Brahmins should own the responsibility for this conspiracy and do atonement in the way we want them do it.
3.Brahmins are practicing exclusivity and untouchability. We would like to touch them freely. We feel insulted when Brahmins refuse to permit us to touch them or when they refuse to touch us. There is no difference between Brahmins and us. Our blood is red and their blood is red. We stand on our legs and they too stand on their legs only. We do bipedal locomotion and they do the same. So we are equal in every respect. Brahmins should accept this and do atonement in the way we want them do it.




Sir, the 3 points in the quoted portion are not the demands from the general public. Such demands are from the ‘Khazhagam party’ only. Since the Brahmin community is a minority, the party got away bullying the minority Brahmins. It is quite unfortunate. The rest of the NB community saw they could be benefitted by the Brahmins vanishing from the scene, they kept quite.

Sir, unless a community put up a fight when required, it can’t survive. That was the case in Tamil Nadu. Sure, at present Tamil Brahmin community is not a competitor in any of the Government jobs quota or in the medical/engineering colleges. So, the majority NB castes are not so interested in Khazhagam activities either. There is no point in bullying anymore. But since Y2K, IT field changed everything. Again that gave the reprieve to Tamil Brahmin community.

Scriptures can be learned from many centres and online now. So, blaming Brahmins is not current anymore. Not that everyone is rushing to learn any way. But personally I always wondered, how 3% of Brahmins kept 97% of very interested NBs from learning scriptures? If those NBs were that interested, they could have beat the living daylights out of the Brahmins so that those Brahmins would not have refused! ( again personal experience – one caste o NBs refused to teach me ‘silambam’ since I did not belong to their caste… learn it I did, from a different caste anyway because I was keen).

Everyone maintains personal space. The policy of untouchability is wrong. At present, it is not practiced by Brahmins but by NBs mostly. Few years ago a you tube serial was posted in this forum which showed untouchability practiced by NBS towards dalits.




Cheers!
 
Dear Sri. Vaagmi,

Addressing post #131 still -

Now if this leaves you wondering what exactly is the atonement, prayaschittam, expression of regret etc., are, then read further.
1. Brahmins should not complain loudly if we beat them. They should not complain if we send our goons to their area/houses and indulge in some mischief. This is one way of atonement.
2. They should not complain if we deny them the right to engage is any useful trade, business or employment as a matter of right. We will leave them some crumbs after we take every thing and they should be satisfied with it because that is one way of doing an atonement. We will not allow them to study in colleges or schools as a matter of right even if they have scored the best marks in exams.
3. They should agree in writing to teach us all the scriptures( it is another matter that we are least interested in learning the scriptures because they are useless for us) and make us the pujaris of all the temples in TN.
4. Finally this is the most important demand: Brahmins should give all their daughters in marriage only to our boys and not to any of Brahmin boys. If this demand is met we are ready to even give up all other demands.


Sir, the first 3 points in the list of atonements are quite silly. They are not serious points at all. But the point #4 is serious. Every community want more girls. Girls from Brahmin community are good. Mostly they are quite good. They do sincerely look after their husband and children very well. Most of them are quite submissive too or at least pretend submissive. As a practical person, I don’t blame anyone seeking the girls.

Sri. Vaagmi, all I can say is, the fights in this forum is quite silly. From your long post I can’t really find any valid reason worth to have a huge fight except for the Brahmin girls. They are worth fighting for. But I am sure, the fights in this forum are not taking part for that reason.

I could be very wrong in my analysing your long post. But that is my view point anyway. Different view point may be presented by others too. I guess we have to wait.
Thank for your input.

Cheers!
 
Dear Sri. Kunjuppu,

i read a lot especially online. and would love to discuss it any day. past two days the biggest storm was raised by jeyamohan article in tamil hindu, suggesting we replace tamil script with roman, when writing the language :) amount of action hatred response..simply amazing.

ஆங்கில எழுத்துருவில் தமிழை எழுதினால் என்ன?

Did you read Manikandan's response to Jeyamohan's proposal? It was hilarious! I was reading Manikandan's and laughing...

It is a pity, the discussions get diverted on the basis of B and NB. But if you noticed closely, the divide becomes predominant only when the DK policies are brought in. In fact, I and yourself could start an argument if the DK policies are brought in. Personally I don't like the word 'Brahmanism'. I rather the honest word 'Paarppaneeyam'. But them most bloggers use the word 'Brahmanism'.

Jeyamohan did not quite brought out the requirements for the need for Tamil language. Tamil is not promoted well. For the last about 50 to 60 years, the literature did not progress well. May be due to lack of funding. The DMK parties did not actually promote real literature. They spoke a lot, but did nothing. All the great novels belonged to the late 50s and 60s. The worst period was 80s... do you remember, the literature was recycled... all the famous novels were repeated? That was due to lack of new writers and new novels I think.

Cheers!
 
All caste based condemnation *is* nothing but another ugly form of Casteism

Today the Brahmin term is just an identity.

There is no central certifying authority to declare who is called Brahmin and who is not. There never was actually.

Human beings have used and will continue to use any form of identity - be it race, color, origin, caste ID, amount of wealth or lack of it, level of education, physical attributes etc .. - to discriminate against other beings.

I did not witness directly any discriminatory behavior in the name of 'Brahminism' and many of my TB friends I grew up with in Delhi never put down others on the basis of caste. Most often we were unaware of the caste ID and its significance. I did go to school with people from Salem who might no0t have been Brahmins. They were not treated any differently in my school.

I remember a few incidence well from those days. Some of my friends from Salem who also happened to be poorer used to ask for my lunch that was packed by my mother. They were hungry and did not bring lunch. A few times I offered they took it all. So my mother used to pack an additional set of Roti etc just for this purpose. She never taught me to look down on them except to make sure I do not go hungry.

Even during my visits to Deep South India I do not remember witnessing any incidence of specific put down on the basis of caste though I am sure it must have existed. Perhaps my world view is different as a result of the values I was raised. So I do not have negative view of Brahmins and TB or for that matter any caste tag.

In my view it is fine to acknowledge and recognize people for their uniqueness but it is another thing to pass gross negative judgement on the basis of their uniqueness on which the person has no control over.

If there is one practical application of Vedanta to real life it is this - respect all beings. Vivekananda's talks emphasize this (I think I remember reading it in a book by name Anushtana Vedantam).

This does not mean that we respect hurtful behaviors done by words, deeds and thoughts by anyone. Hence my message below.

It is more like 'hate the sin, not the sinner'.

I have come across black man who had ill will towards all white people. That is racism in my view. It is not reverse racism but just pure racism. Similarly a woman putting down other women for their gender based bias is pure sexism.

We see a few name calling hypocrites here who in acting holier than thou have been repeatedly passing very disparaging comments about the tag Brahmins. We do not want to call them  BB, brabas etc because that may come across as a badge of honor to them.

Actually their posts are examples of casteism messages that we all should stand against in the spirit of being decent human beings. Again these people may be fine but I am only advocating speaking against their Casteism loaded messages only. Let us call a casteist message when we come across it.
 
Last edited:
Dear Sri. Kunjuppu,



Did you read Manikandan's response to Jeyamohan's proposal? It was hilarious! I was reading Manikandan's and laughing...


Cheers!

raghy, here is another delight from manikandan

கிள்ளி வெச்சுட்டா...

here is a titbit...simply hilarious at times...and heartwarming later.

பாப்பாத்திக்கு பக்கத்து ஊர்தான். உண்மையான பெயர் வேறு என்னவோ- யாருக்குத் தெரியும்? ஆனால் ரொம்ப காலமாகவே அவரை பாப்பாத்தி என்கிறார்கள். ரொம்ப காலம் என்றால் அறுபது, எழுபது வருடங்களுக்கு முன்பிருந்து. அவருக்கு எழுபது வயதுக்கு மேலாக வயது இருக்கும்.

எங்கள் அப்பாவுக்கே அறுபத்தைந்து வயது. அவருக்கு அத்தை என்றால் கணக்கு போட்டுக் கொள்ளுங்கள். குத்துமதிப்பாக கணக்கு போட்டாலும் எழுபதைத் தாண்டி பல வருடங்கள் ஆகியிருக்கும்.

பாப்பாத்தியின் வயதும், பெயரும் இப்பொழுது எந்த விதத்திலும் நமக்கு முக்கியமில்லை. ஆனால் அந்தக் கேரக்டர் இருக்கிறதே- அதை கண்டிப்பாக உங்களிடம் சொல்லிவிட வேண்டும். பாப்பாத்திக்கு எந்த வயதில் இருந்து இந்த பழக்கம் ஒட்டிக் கொண்டது என்று யாருக்கும் தெரியவில்லை. பெரியவர்களிடம் கேட்டால் ‘அவ எப்பவுமே அப்படித்தான்’ என்பார்கள். அவரிடமே கேட்டாலும் கூட பதில் வராது. சிரிப்பார். அவ்வளவுதான். என்ன பழக்கம் என்றுதானே கேட்கிறீர்கள்?

கிள்ளி வைத்துவிடுவார். அவ்வளவுதான். வெறும் கிள்ளி வைப்பதுதான். ஆனால் அதை அவ்வளவு சுலபத்தில் விட்டுவிட முடியாது. ஒரு முறை பாப்பாத்தியிடம் கிள்ளு வாங்கியவர்களிடம் கேட்டுப்பார்க்க வேண்டும். ரத்தக் கண்ணீர் வடிப்பார்கள்.

........

எத்தனை நாளைக்குத்தான் தப்பிக்க முடியும்? பாப்பாத்தி மாட்டிக் கொள்ளும் நேரம் வந்துவிட்டது. அதுவும் அவரது திருமணப் பந்தலில். மாப்பிள்ளை ஏற்கனவே வந்து அமர்ந்துவிட்டார். அந்தக் காலத்தில் ஐயர் எல்லாம் இல்லை. அருமைக்காரர் நடத்தி வைப்பதுதான் திருமணம்.

பெண்ணை அழைத்து வரச் சொன்ன போது பாப்பாத்தி பாந்தமாக அமர்ந்து கொண்டாள். அத்தனை கூட்டத்தை பார்த்தவளுக்கு கையில் அரிப்பெடுத்துக் கொண்டது. ஆனால் பக்கத்தில்தான் யாரும் இல்லையே. கை அடிக்கடி மாப்பிள்ளையை நோக்கி போகிறது. ஆனால் ஒருவாறு சமாளித்துக் கொண்டாள். எந்த ஆசையையும் மிக மூர்க்கத்தனமாக அடக்கி வைத்திருந்தால் ஒரு சமயத்தில் மொத்தக் கட்டுப்பாட்டையும் இழந்துவிடுவோம்.

அப்படித்தான் ஆகிவிட்டது. பாப்பாத்திக்கு அருகில் இருக்கும் ஒரே ஜீவன் மாப்பிள்ளைதான். பட்டு வேஷ்டி, சட்டையும், தலையில் குடுமியோடு சேர்ந்த கிராப்புமாக அமர்ந்திருந்த மாப்பிள்ளைக்கு கெட்டநேரத்திலும் ஒரு நல்ல நேரம். திருகு போட்டுவிட்டாள். அதுவும் தொடையில். இங்கு தொடை என்று சொல்வது சபை நாகரீகம் கருதி என்று புரிந்து கொள்க.

அவன் கடுப்பிலும் வலியிலும் என்னனென்னவோ சொல்லிக் கத்திக் கொண்டிருக்கும் போதே பட்டுவேஷ்டி சிவப்பு நிறத்தில் கம்யூனிஸ்டாக மாறிக் கொண்டிருந்தது. கம்யூனிஸ்ட் எல்லை மீறிப் போனால் நக்ஸலைட்தானே? வலி பொறுக்க முடியாத மாப்பிள்ளை ஓங்கி ஒரு அடி போட்டுவிட்டான்.

பாப்பாத்தி சுருண்டு விழ, காரணத்தைச் சொல்லிவிட்டு எனக்கு இந்த கல்யாணமே என்று ஓடியவன் தான். அந்தக் காலமாக போய்விட்டதால் அதோடு சோலி சுத்தம். பாப்பாத்தியை யாரும் கட்டிக் கொள்ளவில்லை. கடைசி வரைக்கும் தனிக்கட்டைதான்.
 
Every community want more girls. Girls from Brahmin community are good. Mostly they are quite good. They do sincerely look after their husband and children very well. Most of them are quite submissive too or at least pretend submissive. As a practical person, I don’t blame anyone seeking the girls.

Sri. Vaagmi, all I can say is, the fights in this forum is quite silly. From your long post I can’t really find any valid reason worth to have a huge fight except for the Brahmin girls. They are worth fighting for. But I am sure, the fights in this forum are not taking part for that reason.


Cheers!

Dear Shri Raghy,

Well said. The brahmin community needs the allegiance of the girls to the community. They are not only worth fighting for but must be fought for.
 
Dear Shri Raghy,

Well said. The brahmin community needs the allegiance of the girls to the community. They are not only worth fighting for but must be fought for.

Dear Sravna,

I hope the TB bachelors too think this way..all we find is Certified True TB bachelors of this Forum complaining non stop about TB girls!LOL

BTW just for fun sake:

Vaagmi ji said this in one of his post:

He said :
Some times he has come across Rakshasas among Brahmins and angels among NBs. But these are generally exceptions.

So going by his theory it implies that majority of TB are Devas and the majority of Non TB Non Brahmins are Asuras..Now I know why many TB girls are marrying NonTB NB guys..cos you see Girls like BAD BOYS!
 
Last edited:
Dear Sravna,

I hope the TB bachelors too think this way..all we find is Certified True TB bachelors of this Forum complaining non stop about TB girls!LOL

BTW just for fun sake:

Vaagmi ji said this in one of his post:

He said :

So going by his theory it implies that majority of TB are Devas and the majority of Non TB Non Brahmins are Asuras..Now I know why many TB girls are marrying NonTB NB guys..cos you see Girls like BAD BOYS!

Dear Renuka,

Again just for fun:

asuras may temporarily abduct girls but the girls eventually come back to the devas
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Latest ads

Back
Top