tks
0
tks, you are misstating my/athiest position. Atheism is about not believing in a deity who cares about the human condition, an omniscient, omnipotent entity that can be influenced through prayer. To prove such a deity exists is the responsibility of those who claim such a deity exists.
When it comes to a Iswara as the primordial cause of material universe, it is irrational to assert any definitive position. My own view is, the claim that an intelligent and purpose oriented cause, leads to an infinite regress of who caused this cause, and therefore a logical fallacy.
Many upanishads are of the Q/A form, and that is good. However, the claim that all the As of the Upanishads are inerrant is untenable.
tks, to say I will believe when you prove it, is not a belief system, it is nothing but healthy skepticism.
Sri Nara-
At least there is no concept of conversion in Hinduism unlike Christianity or Islam. Therefore no Hindu is going to come and prove anything to you and you have to wait for a long time .
If during an interaction you try to force a point of view that there is no Iswara then that behavior in my mind would be that of a practitioner of an aggressive religion. If you spend enormous time researching religious texts like BG, writings to Sri Vevekananda, prayer practices of theists and objecting to those at available opportunity that is equivalent to practicing a religion of Atheism in my view. It does not matter that the stated position is that you are waiting to be convinced by someone since such a person will never come from a Hindu tradition to win you over.
By the way- I do not believe in Iswara with characteristics you described ! I do not believe in a personal deity that can be influenced by prayers. But I do not consider myself an Atheist either.
Iswara is a concept to be understood by teachings here and now (not after death) and is not a concept to be believed. This does not mean the idea of personal deity is wrong or prayer is silly. It is about going from one level of truth and maturity to another.
Infinite Regression of cause that you mentioned is resolved fully by Advita. To understand this one have to understand the concept of Mithya. There are excellent 'logical' discussions that make a compelling case starting with the five means of knowledge (Pratyaksham, Anumanam, Upamanam, Arthapathi, and Anupalabdhi) and understanding why another Pramana is required to understand Sathyam (reality). My point is there is a vast and profound knowledge that exists for one to undertake study and practices to discover Iswara but one must want to learn this.
Regards