My guess is that it is happy to be left alone and in peace!
Tree too have affection to hug each other
The may LOOK aged but they ARE NOT!
That they love such a close proximity and
have teeth healthy enough to bite through \
the big raw fruit proves that point!
What has age got to do with proximity?
I have noticed this is the Indian way of thinking...husband and wives as they become old sometimes even have different rooms to sleep in.
Old ladies should be encouraged to still share same bed with husband and be as close as possible with him right up till old age.
Only then they will be happy and satisfied and not try to bother their son and their Daughter In Law.
An idle mind is a Devils workshop.
I have noticed communities that still advice close proximity right up till old age have the least MIL vs DIL fights.
Granted that there is much out here that should make us pause and think.Corruption inIndia is a cultural aspect.
Indians seem to think nothing peculiar about corruption . It is everywhere. Indianstolerate corrupt individuals rather than correct them. No race can be congenitally corrupt. Butcan a race be corrupted by its culture? Toknow why Indians are corrupt , look at their patterns and practices .
First:
Religion is transactional in India. Indians give God cash and anticipate an out-of-turn reward. Such a pleaacknowledges that favours are needed for the undeserving. In the worldoutside the temple walls, such a transaction is named- “bribe”.
A wealthy Indian gives not cash to temples, but gold crowns and such baubles. His gifts can not feed the poor. His pay-off is for God. He thinks it will be wasted ifit goes to a needy man.
In June 2009,The Hindu published areport of Karnataka minister G. Janardhan Reddy gifting a crown of gold and diamonds worth Rs 45 crore to Tirupati.
India’s temples collect so much that they don't know what to do with it. Billions are gatheringdust in temple vaults.
When Europeans came to India they built schools.
When Indians go to Europe & USA, they build temples.
Indians believe that if God accepts money for his favours, then nothing iswrong in doing the same thing. This is why Indians are so easily corruptible. Indianculture accommodates such transactions morally. There is no real stigma. Anutterly corrupt JayaLalita ( She recently lost an election in North India) can make a comeback, justunthinkable in the West.
Second -
Indian moral ambiguity towards corruption is visible in its history.
Indian history tells of the capture of cities and kingdoms after guards werepaid off to open the gates, and commanders paid off to surrender.
This is uniqueto India.
Indians'corrupt nature has meant limited warfare on the subcontinent. It is striking how little Indians haveactually
fought compared to ancient Greece andmodern Europe.
The Turks’ battleswith Nadir Shah werevicious and fought to the finish. In India fighting wasn't needed, bribing was enough to see off armies. Any invaderwilling to spend cash couldbrush aside India’s kings, no matter how many tens of thousands soldiers werein their infantry. Little resistance was given by the Indians
at the “Battle” of Plassey. Clive paid offMir Jaffar and all of
Bengal folded to anarmy of 3,000.
There wasalways a financial exchangeto taking Indian forts.
Golconda was captured in 1687 after the secret back door was left open. Mughalsvanquished Marathas andRajputs with nothing but bribes. The Raja ofSrinagar gave up DaraShikoh’s son Sulaiman to Aurangzeb afterreceiving a bribe.
There are manycases where Indians participatedon a large scale in treason due to bribery.
Question is:Why Indians have a transactionalculture while
other 'civilized' nations don't?
Third -
Indians do not believe in the theory that they all can rise if each of thembehaves morally, because that is not the message of their faith.
Their castesystem separates them. They don't believe that all men are equal. This resultedin their division and migrationto other religions .
Many Hindus started their own faith like Sikh, Jain, Buddha and many converted to Christianity and Islam.
The result is that Indians don't trust one another .
There are no Indians in India ,there are Hindus ,Christians, Muslims and what not. Indians forget that 400 years ago they all belonged to one faith.
This division evolved an unhealthy culture. The inequality has resulted ina corrupt society, In India every one is thus against everyone else, except God and even he must be bribed.
CAN WE CHANGE OUR MIND SET???
It is nothing but the other side of the coin.Nothin more to go into deep thinking on this posting.Sorry for posting.
Refer to your Post#1569 on 8/19/2012 8:56 PM
And my subsequent query in Post#1571 about the source for yourinformation.
“The other side of the coin….” What coin are you talking about?
I asked you about source of your information. And you dodged that question. Let me tell you where you got it from. Here it is:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
corruption is not only in India, it is in the whole world today - and will only get worst | John Sunol
Corruption in India
corruption is not only in India, it is in the whole world today - and will only get worst
untill the return of Christ, and only then we will be freeof the corrupt
Tracingthe Historical antecedents of corruption in India
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What you did was CUT and PASTE
Now, you could have avoided being labeled as a plagiarist. Why did you avoid giving us the link?
When I read your post #1569, I had a strange feeling of “déjà vu”, in the sense that the whole thing looked like what an evangelical Christian would have written.
Which makes me wonder: are you a Christian wearing the mask of a Brahmin?
All the members here are neither brahmins nor Tamils.
let noble thoughts come from all directions. :welcome:
If only they were noble! That's only a pipe dream!!