Sec in India
Dear sri KRSji,
My point was secularism can not be applied if your surroundings
have non secular attitude towards you. At the same time we cannot ignore certain facts in the name of secularism.Here if you bring facts and statistics based on a religion, it would be colored communal.If you are not agree with it , its fine.
All people are not equal.People of equal good acts are equal.
Assume if there is a bomb blast.Which group will you suspect? A Brahmin?A chettiar?
There are equal possibilities theoritically.But the ground reality is different.
Even hard core secularists I believe wont buy a land for themselves in Ukkadam or Melappalayam or hugely muslim dominant area.Its not because they hate some religion.But some commnunities in India could
not control its radical elements.( XXXX areava? Prachana pannuvangale!!Many might have heard it.Thats based many people's
on personal experiences.We know the fact.But we wont come out and say it in public .)
The Govt also couldnt do it. Its because of it we can travel to
Saudi and we are not able to go and settle in such places.If you feel pointing out such cases doesnt affect secularism , Its fine.May be you are a new kind of secularist .
I am not for bluntly attacking other religions and others personally.But wrong anti brahmins views should be countered.If a CM shows enormous hate against a community calling it 'snakes'(AAriya aravam) and
others follow them to please him with his blessings,Its our duty to react in all possible legal ways.It may be anyone.How talented and his backgrounds are irrelevant.If others try to isolate you show our protests.
If you dont agree with religious quota its fine. I dont get carried away by anyone the so called anti secularists.I can have my own opinions on issues.
I just pointed out our community's helplessness in preventing injustice to our people.Worst case,some will make fun of it and find fault with us(Quota unakku mattumada...Oorukena irukku.Macha pasanga varala?).
The news headlines are not results of secularism.The news headlines are secularism in India.Others are fascists and many
researchers have found out they are bigger evils for the country than naxals.
Again other religions , rather I can say other religious groups if they work against us,We need to counter them.If they are
cordial we can be more cordial.
I didnt reply any of your particular post in the thread.But yes ,some of them would be in response to your posts. esp the Nazi remark!!!( I dont think anyone from our community at minimum, put a blade and do a pickpocket successfully(given it as a challenge).Not sure if they can turn into Nazis) I got the feeling many times some arguments by the so called secularists(in this forum as well as in India) dont reflect the ground reality.Just wanted to bring my opinions on it.
Thanks,
Fire
Dear sri KRSji,
My point was secularism can not be applied if your surroundings
have non secular attitude towards you. At the same time we cannot ignore certain facts in the name of secularism.Here if you bring facts and statistics based on a religion, it would be colored communal.If you are not agree with it , its fine.
All people are not equal.People of equal good acts are equal.
Assume if there is a bomb blast.Which group will you suspect? A Brahmin?A chettiar?
There are equal possibilities theoritically.But the ground reality is different.
Even hard core secularists I believe wont buy a land for themselves in Ukkadam or Melappalayam or hugely muslim dominant area.Its not because they hate some religion.But some commnunities in India could
not control its radical elements.( XXXX areava? Prachana pannuvangale!!Many might have heard it.Thats based many people's
on personal experiences.We know the fact.But we wont come out and say it in public .)
The Govt also couldnt do it. Its because of it we can travel to
Saudi and we are not able to go and settle in such places.If you feel pointing out such cases doesnt affect secularism , Its fine.May be you are a new kind of secularist .
I am not for bluntly attacking other religions and others personally.But wrong anti brahmins views should be countered.If a CM shows enormous hate against a community calling it 'snakes'(AAriya aravam) and
others follow them to please him with his blessings,Its our duty to react in all possible legal ways.It may be anyone.How talented and his backgrounds are irrelevant.If others try to isolate you show our protests.
If you dont agree with religious quota its fine. I dont get carried away by anyone the so called anti secularists.I can have my own opinions on issues.
I just pointed out our community's helplessness in preventing injustice to our people.Worst case,some will make fun of it and find fault with us(Quota unakku mattumada...Oorukena irukku.Macha pasanga varala?).
The news headlines are not results of secularism.The news headlines are secularism in India.Others are fascists and many
researchers have found out they are bigger evils for the country than naxals.
Again other religions , rather I can say other religious groups if they work against us,We need to counter them.If they are
cordial we can be more cordial.
I didnt reply any of your particular post in the thread.But yes ,some of them would be in response to your posts. esp the Nazi remark!!!( I dont think anyone from our community at minimum, put a blade and do a pickpocket successfully(given it as a challenge).Not sure if they can turn into Nazis) I got the feeling many times some arguments by the so called secularists(in this forum as well as in India) dont reflect the ground reality.Just wanted to bring my opinions on it.
Thanks,
Fire
Dear Sri fire Ji,
Since you have touched on many points in my posting, my response is interspersed in 'blue':
Pranams,
KRS