J
Jamadagneya
Guest
Kunjuppu:
When I used to live in the US, they had a nice expression for viewpoints like yours- "you've drunk the cool-aid". You sound more politically correct than anything. You are equating individual prosperity as defined by a materialist society as being the prosperity of the community at large. All you cite is that mercantilization and globalization of the community, completely negating and corroding its original culture, heritage and history, is prosperity.
Brahmins are under attack for very simple reasons, all over India and particularly TamilNad. Don't tell me some other communities also suffer some of these crises. I am only interested in my community. Here is proof: (I am borrowing the words of a friend of mine here, from a yahoo group)
a) According to the constitution of India, by way of Mandal reservation and other acts, Brahmans are second class citizens when seeking government jobs, admissions to colleges etc. Brahmins have a very high % of literacy, degree holdership etc. In fact, in my family, whether, vedic scholars or not, my people have had university degrees for nearly 7 generations, from the first time colleges were opened in India. and I know that there many many such families. Despite such high %, with 31% O.C reservation, in TN, they get a very small share of the pie, that too for extraordinary merit. An SC or ST with half-the-marks sits in the same class. There goes meritocracy. If it were 100% O.C. far more Brahmins will get in, not because they were Brahmin, but because they were smart and studied hard. But the consitution doesn't give you this fair chance. I got shocked when I found myself protected by equal opportunity laws in London and New York, but not protected in Madras. If someone makes a public comment against Brahmins, I am more protected in New York, than Madras, where the police will not come to my aid.
b) Particularly in Tamil Nadu, a proud Brahmin, sporting his roots and heritage well, speaking his own dialect, unafraidly appearing in Vibhuti or Tiruman or Chandan or Ash marks, i.e. maintaining his identity, cannot get elected anywhere in TamilNad. But a Muslim or a Thevar or a Vanniar can get elected, merely because he plays up his identity. A Brahmin has to suppress his identity to get elected. How many "purely Brahmin", Brahmin MLAs now sit in the "satta sabhai"? SV Sekar and Jayalalitha got elected for other reasons. Not for being clean politicians who embrace their Brahmin identity. How may mayors do you have? How many ward councillors do you have?
Do you recall how many ministers, rajgurus and generals were Brahmins before the time of the Arcot twins? This was a very powerful community, even in politics. But, today?
We shouldn't want to Brahmanize the state, but where is the respect in society that we had just two generations ago?
c) There is a systematic war by the English-language press and the govt, state and centre, in suppressing Hinduism, Sanskritism and Brahmins contributions to India. This is very clear if you have done any research in the history of India from ancient times- particularly the intellectual culture of the 1850-1940 period of TamilNad state. Visit the state archives at Connemara library and spend a few days doing this.
d) You are only talking about cases of individual prosperity- you are not considering the fact, that you are part of a larger community. Each time one more temple is closed, each time a Brahmin priest's son refuses to take up the cloth and takes secular education, every Brahmin must weep. Each time you hear a "potri" in a temple, and not a "namaH", you must weep. If I looked at my bank balance or my education or my children's purses, then I may not be individually affected. But that is being selfish.
e) You did the predictable thing. Look for evidence on the web, the newspapers etc. When the media is tilted against you, no one wants to report you- how will you find any word of it? The biggest holocaust is a silent holocaust. When the Allies came to Auschwitz was when the world learned about the Holocaust. Not earlier. You want to experience the holocaust, go to places that supported huge Brahmin populations and traditions- districts like Tanjore, Trichy, Tinnevelly, Arcot- go look at the old dilapidated temples, the vacated agraharams, formerly Brahmin-owned lands lost to squatters, priests doing other jobs to survive- go to the villages, go to Kapali Temple or Parthasarathy temple and ask the priests outside about their livelihood and status- how the govt doesn't care for them- get your information for yourself. Have you ever tried to run a temple in your native place? How much you have to trade-off to get HRCE funds, how this money goes to churches and mosques easily? A war against Hinduism is more a war against Brahmins. Brahmins embody Hinduism. All the Jews in American and the West, did not suffer the Holocaust. Only those living in German territories did. But, the Jews in America were prosperous. Do they not perceive the Holocaust as having affected them too?
f) The govt is not able to order a genocide of Brahmins, but they are doing everything else. Every record about you in history, in the books or in popular culture is disappearing fast.
g) Whatever prosperity Brahmins have, is individual. It is achieved by individual enterprise, against the backdrop of a state that is predisposed against you. It is achieved by completely trading away your identity. It is achieved by giving up the darbhai for a computer. You can't keep both these days. No one is really learned in both systems-Eastern or Western these days, as they used to be until the 1950s. Lots of my aged relatives and people I know from that generation, had both a western and an eastern education. Where is that spirit now? How many of us have attended even a day at a Veda Patashala? Can speak Sanskrit? Know exactly how do a daily fire sacrifice? Don't equate being a Brahmin with merely being vegetarian, wearing a punal, knowing your gotram and a a handful of shlokams?
If the environment weren't so hostile to you and your way of life, would such things be happening? If instead, Brahmins and what they stood for and the good they do, had state support like in olden times, wouldn't we all have done this, and still studied science? E.g. CV Raman and his assistant Krishnan. Remember the incident about the alcoholic effect on Raman? Not that CV Raman had any state support, but even in a land ruled by foreigners, he didn't have Mandal, Periyarites and Viramani against him. Even you, a Brahmin are denying a holocaust.
Will you call it a holocaust only if you are cooked alive in an open stove and Spielberg makes a move about it? Is it not a holocaust if your heritage is erased from the public record and your own memory?
When other communities also "prosper" in globalized times, they too give up some of their heritage- but most of them came from the masses. They don't have a huge heritage to speak of, like Brahmins do. If a Thevar globalizes, all he has given up is Kalari, Kambu, Vel vilaiyatu and farming as a profession. When a Chetty globalizes, all he gives up is the financial customs of his forefathers. But, a Brahmin? He has to give up every inch of his 60-century intellectual heritage.
All the progress you mention, is merely representative of the fact that Brahmans have kept up with the times. It doesn't say anything more. In fact, Brahmans have always been progressive. Recall that in ancient Greece and India, women were considered public property before marital laws were codified. And it was Shwetaketu, a Brahmin who invented the first marital laws. From that time, Brahmans have done a lot. People who build edifices of cultural identity for a nation and integrate it, are always progressive. What Gandhi did for two decades, Brahmins have done for millennia.
Historically, there is now no real thing called a "Tamil Andanan". They existed in the Sangam times. Today they can't be more than 1% of the Tamil Brahmin population. Everyone else has historically traceable roots from elsewhere. May be if there were a Brahman genome project, we can prove this genetically too. For instance, we know when Vadamas migrated, in terms of traditions, their practices etc. Both Saivite, Vaishnavite and secular scholars have commented on such things. Descendants of Vadamas constitute a good number of Iyer as well as Iyengar population. The "Tamil Andandan" has his descendants only among some "chozhiyam" families of Tinnevelly now. If you don't want to read scholarly sources like PhD theses about such matters, (I remember a stellar thesis by a lady in the Meerut university in 1960, about Brahmin holocaust in Mayuram), at least read easily available material like the lectures of Kanchi periyaval. I mention him specifically though I don't agree with many other things he taught, because he has written extensively about the various Brahmin migrations, effects on Vedic dialects, Sangam-age Brahmins etc. Interestingly, he concluded anecdotally, based purely on his own study and observations, what academicians can support with formal research.
All you are telling me is that with these so-called advances you cite, Brahmans have "prospered". This is not true prosperity and this is not prosperity of the community at large. When Kamala Hasan's movie caricutarized and bashed Brahmins and Hindus, how many rose up? Was there any serious reaction from ******* or other people? First of all, how many Brahmins who saw the Dasavatharam movie, even understood the subtext of anti-Brahmin bigotry? When you have traitorous Brahmins like this fellow, Ram and Ravi of The Hindu etc in the mass media, what else can you expect, but a deafening silence about the Brahman Holocaust?! The recent move of New Year by the CM to Jan 14, is a barefaced slap against Brahmins, As is tamil archanai, or calling Deepvali, "deepa oli tirunal". Don't you realize that the Aryan-Dravidian theory has died out even in hostile Western academia, but is state policy in TamilNad? Each time a policy is enacted or their is social engineering or meddling with customs, it is always Brahman baiting. How about social justice for Brahmins for a change? Have you tried to get any merit-cum-means grants or scholarship or pension from the govt? Do you know how tough it is for the poor Brahmin communities in the South. And with stuporous, languorous organizations like ******* we arent fighting back- or even helping each other as survivalists.
So, these matters aren't pan-Brahmin. They affect the Tamil Brahmin the most and the Andhra Brahmin next. Because it is in these states that anti-Brahminism is so rampant. Tamilnad led the way. Andhra followed. A Tamil Brahmin has therefore the highest duty to fight for his kind, first, before anybody else lines up for the Brahmin cause.
Wake up!
When I used to live in the US, they had a nice expression for viewpoints like yours- "you've drunk the cool-aid". You sound more politically correct than anything. You are equating individual prosperity as defined by a materialist society as being the prosperity of the community at large. All you cite is that mercantilization and globalization of the community, completely negating and corroding its original culture, heritage and history, is prosperity.
Brahmins are under attack for very simple reasons, all over India and particularly TamilNad. Don't tell me some other communities also suffer some of these crises. I am only interested in my community. Here is proof: (I am borrowing the words of a friend of mine here, from a yahoo group)
a) According to the constitution of India, by way of Mandal reservation and other acts, Brahmans are second class citizens when seeking government jobs, admissions to colleges etc. Brahmins have a very high % of literacy, degree holdership etc. In fact, in my family, whether, vedic scholars or not, my people have had university degrees for nearly 7 generations, from the first time colleges were opened in India. and I know that there many many such families. Despite such high %, with 31% O.C reservation, in TN, they get a very small share of the pie, that too for extraordinary merit. An SC or ST with half-the-marks sits in the same class. There goes meritocracy. If it were 100% O.C. far more Brahmins will get in, not because they were Brahmin, but because they were smart and studied hard. But the consitution doesn't give you this fair chance. I got shocked when I found myself protected by equal opportunity laws in London and New York, but not protected in Madras. If someone makes a public comment against Brahmins, I am more protected in New York, than Madras, where the police will not come to my aid.
b) Particularly in Tamil Nadu, a proud Brahmin, sporting his roots and heritage well, speaking his own dialect, unafraidly appearing in Vibhuti or Tiruman or Chandan or Ash marks, i.e. maintaining his identity, cannot get elected anywhere in TamilNad. But a Muslim or a Thevar or a Vanniar can get elected, merely because he plays up his identity. A Brahmin has to suppress his identity to get elected. How many "purely Brahmin", Brahmin MLAs now sit in the "satta sabhai"? SV Sekar and Jayalalitha got elected for other reasons. Not for being clean politicians who embrace their Brahmin identity. How may mayors do you have? How many ward councillors do you have?
Do you recall how many ministers, rajgurus and generals were Brahmins before the time of the Arcot twins? This was a very powerful community, even in politics. But, today?
We shouldn't want to Brahmanize the state, but where is the respect in society that we had just two generations ago?
c) There is a systematic war by the English-language press and the govt, state and centre, in suppressing Hinduism, Sanskritism and Brahmins contributions to India. This is very clear if you have done any research in the history of India from ancient times- particularly the intellectual culture of the 1850-1940 period of TamilNad state. Visit the state archives at Connemara library and spend a few days doing this.
d) You are only talking about cases of individual prosperity- you are not considering the fact, that you are part of a larger community. Each time one more temple is closed, each time a Brahmin priest's son refuses to take up the cloth and takes secular education, every Brahmin must weep. Each time you hear a "potri" in a temple, and not a "namaH", you must weep. If I looked at my bank balance or my education or my children's purses, then I may not be individually affected. But that is being selfish.
e) You did the predictable thing. Look for evidence on the web, the newspapers etc. When the media is tilted against you, no one wants to report you- how will you find any word of it? The biggest holocaust is a silent holocaust. When the Allies came to Auschwitz was when the world learned about the Holocaust. Not earlier. You want to experience the holocaust, go to places that supported huge Brahmin populations and traditions- districts like Tanjore, Trichy, Tinnevelly, Arcot- go look at the old dilapidated temples, the vacated agraharams, formerly Brahmin-owned lands lost to squatters, priests doing other jobs to survive- go to the villages, go to Kapali Temple or Parthasarathy temple and ask the priests outside about their livelihood and status- how the govt doesn't care for them- get your information for yourself. Have you ever tried to run a temple in your native place? How much you have to trade-off to get HRCE funds, how this money goes to churches and mosques easily? A war against Hinduism is more a war against Brahmins. Brahmins embody Hinduism. All the Jews in American and the West, did not suffer the Holocaust. Only those living in German territories did. But, the Jews in America were prosperous. Do they not perceive the Holocaust as having affected them too?
f) The govt is not able to order a genocide of Brahmins, but they are doing everything else. Every record about you in history, in the books or in popular culture is disappearing fast.
g) Whatever prosperity Brahmins have, is individual. It is achieved by individual enterprise, against the backdrop of a state that is predisposed against you. It is achieved by completely trading away your identity. It is achieved by giving up the darbhai for a computer. You can't keep both these days. No one is really learned in both systems-Eastern or Western these days, as they used to be until the 1950s. Lots of my aged relatives and people I know from that generation, had both a western and an eastern education. Where is that spirit now? How many of us have attended even a day at a Veda Patashala? Can speak Sanskrit? Know exactly how do a daily fire sacrifice? Don't equate being a Brahmin with merely being vegetarian, wearing a punal, knowing your gotram and a a handful of shlokams?
If the environment weren't so hostile to you and your way of life, would such things be happening? If instead, Brahmins and what they stood for and the good they do, had state support like in olden times, wouldn't we all have done this, and still studied science? E.g. CV Raman and his assistant Krishnan. Remember the incident about the alcoholic effect on Raman? Not that CV Raman had any state support, but even in a land ruled by foreigners, he didn't have Mandal, Periyarites and Viramani against him. Even you, a Brahmin are denying a holocaust.
Will you call it a holocaust only if you are cooked alive in an open stove and Spielberg makes a move about it? Is it not a holocaust if your heritage is erased from the public record and your own memory?
When other communities also "prosper" in globalized times, they too give up some of their heritage- but most of them came from the masses. They don't have a huge heritage to speak of, like Brahmins do. If a Thevar globalizes, all he has given up is Kalari, Kambu, Vel vilaiyatu and farming as a profession. When a Chetty globalizes, all he gives up is the financial customs of his forefathers. But, a Brahmin? He has to give up every inch of his 60-century intellectual heritage.
All the progress you mention, is merely representative of the fact that Brahmans have kept up with the times. It doesn't say anything more. In fact, Brahmans have always been progressive. Recall that in ancient Greece and India, women were considered public property before marital laws were codified. And it was Shwetaketu, a Brahmin who invented the first marital laws. From that time, Brahmans have done a lot. People who build edifices of cultural identity for a nation and integrate it, are always progressive. What Gandhi did for two decades, Brahmins have done for millennia.
Historically, there is now no real thing called a "Tamil Andanan". They existed in the Sangam times. Today they can't be more than 1% of the Tamil Brahmin population. Everyone else has historically traceable roots from elsewhere. May be if there were a Brahman genome project, we can prove this genetically too. For instance, we know when Vadamas migrated, in terms of traditions, their practices etc. Both Saivite, Vaishnavite and secular scholars have commented on such things. Descendants of Vadamas constitute a good number of Iyer as well as Iyengar population. The "Tamil Andandan" has his descendants only among some "chozhiyam" families of Tinnevelly now. If you don't want to read scholarly sources like PhD theses about such matters, (I remember a stellar thesis by a lady in the Meerut university in 1960, about Brahmin holocaust in Mayuram), at least read easily available material like the lectures of Kanchi periyaval. I mention him specifically though I don't agree with many other things he taught, because he has written extensively about the various Brahmin migrations, effects on Vedic dialects, Sangam-age Brahmins etc. Interestingly, he concluded anecdotally, based purely on his own study and observations, what academicians can support with formal research.
All you are telling me is that with these so-called advances you cite, Brahmans have "prospered". This is not true prosperity and this is not prosperity of the community at large. When Kamala Hasan's movie caricutarized and bashed Brahmins and Hindus, how many rose up? Was there any serious reaction from ******* or other people? First of all, how many Brahmins who saw the Dasavatharam movie, even understood the subtext of anti-Brahmin bigotry? When you have traitorous Brahmins like this fellow, Ram and Ravi of The Hindu etc in the mass media, what else can you expect, but a deafening silence about the Brahman Holocaust?! The recent move of New Year by the CM to Jan 14, is a barefaced slap against Brahmins, As is tamil archanai, or calling Deepvali, "deepa oli tirunal". Don't you realize that the Aryan-Dravidian theory has died out even in hostile Western academia, but is state policy in TamilNad? Each time a policy is enacted or their is social engineering or meddling with customs, it is always Brahman baiting. How about social justice for Brahmins for a change? Have you tried to get any merit-cum-means grants or scholarship or pension from the govt? Do you know how tough it is for the poor Brahmin communities in the South. And with stuporous, languorous organizations like ******* we arent fighting back- or even helping each other as survivalists.
So, these matters aren't pan-Brahmin. They affect the Tamil Brahmin the most and the Andhra Brahmin next. Because it is in these states that anti-Brahminism is so rampant. Tamilnad led the way. Andhra followed. A Tamil Brahmin has therefore the highest duty to fight for his kind, first, before anybody else lines up for the Brahmin cause.
Wake up!
Last edited: