prasad1
Active member
Renuka M'am,
Good analysis.
But, as the older generations respected privacy, the women had baths/cleaning chores after all the other members finished using the backyards (doors). Plus, they were all aradhakAs, who perform daily religious karmAs with sincerity. Plus, according to Smriti (parasara), one doing aradhana to the deities must be clean, they themselves had to take bath if they get unclean during the process - touching the body/hairs, touching other unbathed members etc. So, to avoid all these hazzles, hygiene environments were maintained. Plus, women stayed as home-makers, as only sevice to the Lord was the supreme goal for them. All hardsips were considered part of nature and service to the deities.
We have parted our ways, so we cant blame them!
Even if there are bathrooms (in India without water!) and napkins (polluting the world!) freely available, still they had to reman separate. Those new tools are for convenience, that doesnot rule out the concept of asuddhi (bad-energy) and not obstruct the worship. There are a lineage of iyengers, the men cook for the deities and do all worship. But olden days of joint-family, mother-in-law would cook, these daughter-in-law would rest, but now in single families where men dont cook, women had to cook even during those unhygienic days. May be they should do punyahavachanam. In foreign countries, where there are carpet-floors, everything is impure!
How about EQUALITY?! Those days, women should rest. Brahmin/Any men had to be taught cooking and house-hold chores! Hari-bOl!
Sir, we are 21st century.
Other than few TB stuck in TN do you think any one cares for such view? Look around the world, these are outdated views, things have changed. We do not ride bullock carts we arrive in BMW's.
If Amma had periods (?) would you care to tell her your views on how to do things? You are imposing your views on gullible or suppressed women.