Renuka,
I know the difference between "in essence" and "in its essence". I know you are arguing for arguments sake.
Renuka,
Everything evolves. If you say I do not evolve and a perfection right from my birth or right from my first birth if you believe in rebirths, then you are only deluding yourself. You are not brave enough to face any competition and want it easy all the way. That is not how nature works. You need to compete, win or fail and evolve.
Renuka,
Without thinking about the nitty gritties, think about this
Jivatma till it dawns upon it that it is paramatma does not realize it is paramatma. Even if it is the consciousness that evolves and makes the jivatma realize it is paramatma, something has to change in the jivatma to get that realization.\
This change I believe is constantly happening as the consciousness evolves as you say.
My view is that the evolution is at all levels and in concordance including an evolved body for an evolved jivatma and mind. It is the Atman that is absolutely unchanging and standing just a witness.
Renuka,
Even in the snippet you sent I was able to see that you were misinterpreting. You need to properly understand than ask me to read.
"Jivatma is a mixture of pratyagatma, the sukshma sarira and sthoola sarira. When the unenlightened man
refers to himself as “I”, he is referring to the sthoola-sukshma-sarira complex (what we generally refer to as the body-mind-complex). He is not aware of the pratyagatma, which is the same as Brahman, the pure, infinite consciousness. The identification with Brahman which Sastra shows as the only means of liberation from samsara is not possible unless we recognize pratyagatma as our real nature, and learning from Sastra that pratyagatma is not different from Brahma caitanyam, identify ourself with Brahman."
Dear Renuka,
Pratyagatma of Jivatma is what is Atman or Brahman. Till the illusion of sukshma sarira and sthoola sarira is seen the jivatma is in not a fully evolved state. You may call it unveiling of maya, shedding of ignorance or evolution. It is all the same.
Link:
http://www.vedantaadvaita.org/AdvaitaVedanta_3.htm
Section 2
I will get back to you soon as I will be traveling.The understanding states " He is not aware".
What constitutes the definition of " he"?
It also talks about the unenlightened man identifying with the sthoola sukshma sharira complex leaving out pratyagatma(jeeva) in the equation.
Can you kindly elaborate why is the Pratyagatma( Jeeva) left out here and only gross and subtle body identified with?
Is it becos the Jeeva does not undergo change or evolves as per explanation of Aurobindo?
Jeeva is only unveiled and Jeeva has all the while been same as Paramatma.
The stumbling block was only the identification with the gross and subtle bodies.
The understanding states " He is not aware".
What constitutes the definition of " he"?
It also talks about the unenlightened man identifying with the sthoola sukshma sharira complex leaving out pratyagatma(jeeva) in the equation.
Can you kindly elaborate why is the Pratyagatma( Jeeva) left out here and only gross and subtle body identified with?
Is it becos the Jeeva does not undergo change or evolves as per explanation of Aurobindo?
Jeeva is only unveiled and Jeeva has all the while been same as Paramatma.
The stumbling block was only the identification with the gross and subtle bodies.
Renuka,
The most uncomplicated interpretation is this:
Jivatma is veiled by maya. The maya is slowly unveiled and the jivatma and so the mind evolves. When the maya is totally unveiled, the jivatma realizes that it is verily Atman. It is not total ignorance first and then eventually sudden realization in one stroke. It gradually happens. That is the reason I say the jivatma evolves.
All maya vaadis are Shunya Vaadis. They can not comprehend the truth beyond shunya. So they always end up in that shunya in which everything is dissolved. LOL.
So they seek jivan mukti. Try to reach samAdhi on the way. And get distracted by the ashtamasidhdhi that comes wkith samAdhi. And pat themselves on their back for their uncommon abilities. Poor souls. Formula engine in the bonnet of a 1955 Ambassador. LOL.
That is why I recommended Dualism in one of my post here cos its easier on the mind.
There is no God but Vishnu and Ramanuja is His Prophet!
There is one God --an indeterminable entity. He is known by several names. He is known by the name Narayana as indicated by Vedas. So for those following the vedic religion God is Narayana.
Srimad Ramanuja is one among the Acharyas who perceived the reality as explained in Vedas and so he is a revered Acharya for many.
I object to the attempt to describe the Hindu religion in the limited vocabulary of other world religions.
Dear Renuka,
It is self consciousness through which Jivatma realizes the truth.
What do you object?
Is it the body that utters the words that you object to?
If it is the body that you object..let it be known that both bodies are made up of 5 elements that will disintegrate one day.
If it is the Atma that you object..be reminded the same Atma resides in all and you would be objecting the same Self too.
O' Vaishnava....so what can you really object to?