E
To Hari and sapr, This figure is the latest based upon a election for a Big Church here.
Im not going in details to debate how a law can't control one's personal faith et all,
but, wanna drive the point, that Indian Law makers are definitely not in favour of any of your points.
Verdicts also infers that, majority of the Indians dont feel the way like you do.
So we can only talk loud and whine about, but cant act, because these points are beyond practicaly and reality, though its possible in Islamic countries.
1)What BJP could do, when in Power?
2) The so called Anti-coversion politicians has to bite-the-dust in the recent elections
3) Even J.J has to withdraw her anti-conversion law.
4) And these kind of laws are existing, only in the Islamic gulf countries, but not in developed and developing nations.
Is there anyway, by which you can make the law makers to enact such laws, in our Indian Democratic set up? I would seek, some suggestions regarding this..
In my view,religion is a personal choice, and one can't keep it for your head-count or protection of flocks. Its a conviction within one's heart and cannot ask one to go to a magistrate to register and get a certificate for my change of heart?
Can any number of law and rule be able to control debauchery?
Now that, they have more integrated with the mainland culture, its seems you have a problem again... I mean, you are taking a U-turn asking them not to use Indian-hindu identity and culture..
To Hari and sapr, This figure is the latest based upon a election for a Big Church here.ToTal Population of my area is 21,389.(last Ward Election) the Church said their membership 20thousand plus and that theypuchased 23thousand water Bottles,and cooldrinks. My figure is corret.More over In our area All this christions will give money to do all type of Pujas in Hindu Small gods Temples. To Stop Conversions, Firest we must unite all Tamil speaking Hindu's to bring under one Umperla.No deviation from Hindu faith.Equal status to All Hindu(no Caste Basis). s.r.k
I think the whole concept of "evaluating a faith" is outlandish.
I am not keen on "amalgamation" but certainly i am against "acquisition".
I choose my girl friend, after evaluating her, not because my father has told me to love her.
I carefully choose my would-be after evaluating all her aspects of Love,education,beauty etc etc.
I buy my GPS phone, after thoroughly evaluating all its road-map features..
If you agree, that, All religions are striving to attempt to find a Road map to God, one should also have the right in evaluating and choosing the right path (route) based upon his taste,choice and conviction.. I dont find anything wrong evaluating it.. And one dont need follow any CMMI/B.S/ASTM norms to do so.. Its all about our own personal convictions.
Above all, if you take this stand,and believe in this, you will really feel power in you to promote and proclaim the greatness of hinduism all across the country. Or else, 'you be mine' and 'I be myself' approach, will only let others encroach on you, which is indeed a human nature..
If you agree, that, All religions are striving to attempt to find a Road map to God, one should also have the right in evaluating and choosing the right path (route) based upon his taste,choice and conviction.. I dont find anything wrong evaluating it..
Have you ever thought why proselytization is non-existent in Islamic countries ?>>I have a problem with the fradulent methods of the Christian missionaries. Nothing more.
Dear HH, seeking your outlook on this data.
1) Kerala/Goa which ranks top in social index like Literacy/Percapita/women empowerment/health care also ranks high in Christian population.
2) Indian Christians and Jains ranks top in Literacy,percapita income and job participation (Census data)
3) In 50 years south korea became top 10 in global economy and in the same span became a Christian majority country too..
Here, I'm finding difficult to relate poverty & illiteracy, to the point you are claiming about cheating pastors.
But, have you ever pondered, why the developed nations openly/freely allow the moslems to freely convert the Christians? Its because, respect for religious freedom is the most important thing, and fundamental right, which the modern world is marching towards. Hope you and I dont wish to drive India to follow the Arab-standards.
Secondly, fradulent methods is very well condemned and covered under Indian law. Any such activity could be reported to the nearest police station, and I havent read any such complaints poping up in morning news paper..In a country where an FIR is filed for even Penicil-eraser thefts, Im sure this could not have gone un-noticed..
The problem here is, we failed to understand the core issue /psyche behind conversion. And as usual, one is very much content with making some political statements like Rice Christians/Foreign money/Proselityzation/Missionary etc etc.. Matter of fact,they are not the actual reasons.. Pls ponder over it!!
PS: Pls ref #34, and come clear where/how I have misquoted you..I would suggest you to elaborate that post please. Thanks in advance
This is quite revealing. I have always believed that by these inculturation techniques Christianity is actually diluting its core beliefs. If this is true in the end you create a hotch potch of a religion which is neither Christian or Hindu.
Sapr,
I was primarily referring to karnataka, andhra and the north of india reg poverty and conversions.
.
As long as missionaries continue to receive funds from overseas, the local guys will do anything to nativize, even make a hotch-potch new religion, still call it christianity and probably yet an original one at that
I feel christians have an inferiority complex.
Infront of other religions, they behave in a cheap manner
Dear HH,
First of all you should answer me this basic question.. Do you think the great ancient 5000 year old traditions could be bought over,for few cups of rice.. if so, I have a question to revert, is that so cheap, it could be bought for money..Even if, do you think, we Indians dont have a good heart to offer few kilos of rice, to the neighbour who is reeling under hunger, for his daily bread... If so, why should I follow that cruel tradition,which doesnt encourage Good Samaritans, and watch some one stuggle for few bags of rice and in turn get converted and comfortable to be called by you and me as 'Those Rice christians'???.. Apologize, Im just being rude here,with my words..
No sir you are not being rude. You are speaking of ground reality. I agree with you wholeheartedly that poverty is main reason for many a thing. However, i do not understand whatever is the 'cruel tradition' that you are speaking of...I do not agree that Indians do not have a good heart to offer a few kilos of rice to the needy neighbour. Barring politicians, and a certain creed of selfish individuals, i have come across many a person doing his part, either as physical work with an organisation like cry or contributing financially whatever he can in his capacity. The whole point is india has too huge a population and yes, it is poor.
your point on previous post is, that people follow J.C because of their poverty and dalitism.. But then, i pointed out back saying, these were are all not the true facts, when analysing human-index facts , in line with our national census data..What I mean to say is, the average human-index of a christian-Indian is far better than an average Indian moslem or hindu.By analysing the data, I feel, that they were not cheated by the Pastors, as someone claimed here..
Barring few ppl who do really convert of faith, i do think poverty motivates ppl to convert. Obviously if a christian recieves funds, his position in life will be far better than an average indian battling poverty. This however, does not mean conversions happen due to fraudulent practices alone, it also happens because it is in the human nature of any man to go for something that can help him make a better life. I do belive poverty or better biz prospects and better networking do make a man convert.
Instead of seriously working on this facts, with brain storming session,and investigate the real issues behind,you went on to talk about Karnataka and Hyderabad.. Why not.... they may also reach to the top another few decades after, like how I explained about South Korea ?
Sapr, i have nothing to say if you wish to think that conversions happen out of faith only. There is no smoke without fire. I myself have met monks who have been told by marginalized ppl 'hamen dokha diya' meaning they got cheated by missionaries who offered them some money and later did nothing to help them financially or otherwise when they were ostracized by other villagers (needless to say in many cases the money they got for conversion was actually spent on liquor and in fact they felt 'cheated' because they were not getting a continuous supply of money from the missionaries). In such cases, the converts (not the missionaries) and their sloth and greed were the culprits. And i think i too explained my stance about South Korea fairly ok.
Anyways, in my view, I dont want to compare god and religion in terms of money and social index..Its all about conviction.. Just because it was pointed out that Christians were cheated by missionaries, I brought this point out..
The moral of the story is, its all about conviction.. As Beatles sang .. Cant buy my love......money cant buy my love...I would add, money cant buy my love to God..Thankfully, we are all talking about the same God.
Sapr, if you have noticed, hindus are not considering themselves 'exclusive' but it is christianity that claims it is the 'only' path to heaven. Hindus think all are talking about the same god, and Jesus is as much a diety as Ram or Krishna. However, it is christians who do not seem to share the common-ness, since god to them cannot be anyone else apart from Jesus.
Lemme ask you a simple question.. How may of us (Good Samaritans) pressed the 'Donate button and swiped our credit card asking Praveen to spend this money for a good cause, through paypal?
Sapr, am not inclined to speak about contributions. Am not rich, but we are fairly content in life and are confident of coursing thru life fairly well. I actually do not need to go to work. But i do, since i made commitments and have never depended upon anyone to be given money (even as a teenager i did not depend on my parents). I value my financial freedom bcoz it helps me spend money the way i wish to.
We are yet to come to reality.. Foreign funds & Missionaries!!! Huh.. Most of the forum members claim that they accomplished their fortunes by working in foreign countries.. How many 'Good samaritans' helped with few kilos of rice on par with a rice-missionary.. Im sure missionaries are not funded by U.N or World Bank loans.. Its all someone, out there in that foreign land ( like our own folks who migrated), with a ' Good Samaritan' heart/cause to donate his own hard earned penny for the needy, to remove hunger of a fellow human being!!
Sapr, there are very many indians doing their part. Why only those who go overseas, those who live in india too do their small part. My mum lives on a pension (she too manages her finances seperate from dad and has the freedom to spend as she wishes) and she shares her income with an ashram and a temple that does regular annadanam. But ofcourse as individuals, there is only that much that each of us can do. A paltry bit actually. Nobody in their individual right can match the might of missionaries as regards funds. Only wish ppl like the ambanis, tatas, birlas, godrejs, etc did something for the needy.
Only christians try to convert others to their religion. Are we trying to convert anybody to Hinduism..
Shri.Venkatramani,
Now coming to the point about your statement,ie, Hindus dont convert others... Should I take it as positive moral or as a negative laid back selfish attitude?
hindus believe in letting each one live his own life as per his own faith. no its not selfishness at all.
yes it is positive in the fact that it does not infringe upon anyone's personal faith. while hindusim is about accepting all ways, christians and muslims on the other hand do not accept 'all ways', there is no concept of ekam satya in these religions.
In the ancient times, when sailing across the sea was banned, I wa wondering how Hinduism reached to the shores of Sumatra, Sri.Lanka, Java..Any act of Holy Ghost? I've been on a holiday to Ankorvat temple, and still i couldnt figure out how Hinduism would have spread there, if not, for some one tried to preach hinduism to those natives of that lonely nation or with some kings edict... Please do some reading about the spread of Hinduism amongst Sikkim tribals in the 18th century..
Hinduism is a wide spread set of beliefs, with very many schools, it is possible the southeast asians were hindu before buddism reached them.
True there were some debates by a few inspired vipras, they were intellectual in nature. What is to be noted is that there has never been proselytizing and hindus have never found the need to market religion. Marketing religion, i think is degrading to the religion.
Anyone was / is welcome to the hindu faith, if they so feel the need to be a part of it. And obviously, people either adopted hinduism or it was already present in their native spirit beliefs, nature beleifs, animist beliefs, etc (as is found in some of the native indonesian, thai, cambodian, etc cultures). Why, there is a korean link to india as well: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/India/South-Koreas-Ayodhya-connection/articleshow/847880.cms
I can only conclude, that, the supposed to be the guardians of Hinduism and its scriputures failed to do their duty and proclaim hinduism, instead moved on, in their pursuit of worldly materials, in order to keep up with the modern trends.. And in the process, a substitute of intalling a good priestly system was also not maintained.. And now its caught up in the dilemma.. And to convince the crowd, one is forced to say, Hinduism doesnt preach or proclaim.. In my personal opinion, being handicapped is just covered in the name of ' Hinduism dont preach or convert"..
Why do we need to proclaim any religion. It is personal faith. Why should a hindu try to convert anyone. If someone wants to belong to hinduism, he comes to the hindu faith himself.
Agreed the priestly class may have moved on to other professions, but there continue to be very many ashrams, monks, sages, yogis, who keep traditions going.
No sir we are not caught in any dilemma. We are only against abuse of our faith, just because someone wants to harvest numbers.
Am amused at your idea that if someone does not proclaim hinduism then it is some sorta weakness or selfishness. That kind of thinking probably comes from a missionary type of mentality perhaps.
We fail to forget the good works done by Shri. Adi Shankara in walking acoss the country to proclaim it..We carefully forget the spread of hinduism by the kings across the sea's..What ISKON is doing?
And to cover up this inablity, we need a good scape goat.. And you call him as 'Christian missionary', a good imaginary enemy indeed..
Let me conclude this way... Lets say, I have found something good and great in Hinduism.. I find 'Sanatana Dharma' as the best appealing way for salvation.. say,I've found the secrets of good life in Hindu way of life..Now,if not for myself being selfish, whats stops me from proclaiming the greatness of hinduism across 7 seas.. Whats wrong , out of concern for my neighbour,if I proselytize him, and make him understand and follow and ENJOY himself the goodness of hinduism, and bail him out?..
Unless one is selfish, I think, each one's attitude of failing to proclaim hinduism, can only be attributed as, ones weakness..