Happy.Hindu]]] Dear HH, How much your question is a valid one, in line with the forum mission?... If so, and if I were to respond you with an 'entirely opposite view', how would my response be falling/useful to the forum's mission?. Please give me a conving answer to the second question, upon which I will make up my mind to respond to you. Btw, I liked your question, and I can share a long thought on this, in terms of defining,what Abuse is all about
Sapr,
This is a hindu centric forum, and a brahmin-centric one, designed to uphold traditions and benefit the brahmin community.
As regards my position, am clear that am not a brahmin (my guru does not consider himself as having attained complete understanding of 'brahman' as yet, and considers himself a brahmachari but not a brahmin as yet, though born in a family of priests; and for a beginner like me i do not dare call myself anywhere close to a brahmin. i accept all definitions of a brahmin as defined by various schools, but personally i have been tending to follow monastic vedantin yoga schools).
What i am is that i am a lover of brahmanical cultures (i also love other cultures so i tend to pick and choose, and that part is my own shortcoming). And i wish well for the brahmin as well as all of the hindu community.
All in all: i am very clear that no-matter-what, i support my hindu brethern.
This does not mean blind support. If there is fraud happening in hinduism, i will accept it and try to find ways to mitigate it.
I do think the question i posed to you was in line with the forum's mission. It does concern hindus. It does not matter if your view is opposite or not.
Am not interested in beating around the bush trying to define abuse according to individual yardsticks. Therefore i wud not really appreciate a long (or longwinded) thot on your definition of abuse.
Sure you can touch upon abuse (in brief), but what i wud expect is a direct answer on whether or not the vandalism and abuse of gods and goddesses by missionaries is an ethical thing to do.
When I raised the question whether he can go to a church and say that JC is not God, he didn't answer. Same way let him not come here and talk anything against our community. Let him go to the appropriate forums and preach Kancha Illiah's message.
EVR didnot ask such questions,whether one would permit him inside a place of worship or not?.. He forced and tresspassed , and set a revolutionay example, which has now become an accepted norm.. Similarly, if you have such a good conviction about your question, you should do it.
Don't ask ppl from the decent world people to garland pics of Jesus with slippers or indulge in physical violence to set a so-called revolutionary example. Am amazed you considered EVR an example wrt the church (what you consider as 'norms' is ridiculous).
Knock every church and preach to prove to the Christians 'That JC is not a true God' and convince them.. Is'nt it a good idea to stop conversions of Christians and moslems?
Nobody is interested in stopping conversions. Its fraud that we are bothered about. Its ridiculous the way you pass on old wine in a new bottle as though you did not understand what was being told to you so far.
Why shd a hindu try to prove ridiculous things as 'true god' and 'false god' - its a christian missionary obession to do that - to even stoop to the extent of labelling and using depraved stuff like rape and prostitution to propagate their "faith"; while shamelessly abusing others' religious sentiments and behaving like crass cads.
Some of the books I always read with interest are, Kancha Ilaiah,Davinci code, Satanic Verses... Also, I did not fail to buy those books which published counterviews also..
But in my personal view, if you feel and fully convinced that JC is not God, you should go all out to prove your point. Why just in a church, you should even knock the doors of Vatican and try to prove your point. Absolutely, there is nothing wrong in it, and Im saying this in true spirits.
There are many a variety of religious people, who used to teach me with their subjects.. Some talk with convincing mode..Some talk with abusive mode.. some with offensive mode.. But I dont shut my doors or ears.. Rather, offer them a cup of coffee, understand what he has to say, any thing better than what I have, and if its good, I quickly pick them up, as a learning.. Thats my perspective, which may not go well with many of us..
don't expect me to try to believe that...if that's the case why do you seem to run away from certain direct questions...i will not repeat it anymore nor will i converse with you until you address it (not with a long winded lecture on what you think is abuse).
Mr. sapr333:
I should have known when you kept referring to EVR as your role model. After all, he was the guy who did procession of all our Hindu Gods with chappals around them, and thrashed the idols of Pillayar and other statues on the streets. He also terrorized the poor and hapless brahmins by cutting their sacred threads, harassed the women and God knows what else.
Shri.Venkataramani, Intentionally,I didnt answer that question earlier, I found no relevancy in it. Since you asked again, my answer is this..
First of all, Im not a owner of any church/mosque/temple.If I own one, sure I would welcome you to share your views and also would request you to listen to the counter views. Exchange of ideas and evaluating them is the way, the modern world is moving through. I absolutely attach NO sentiments with it..
Are you owner of this website? If not, you should have followed the same principle which you are preaching me. If the owners of this site don't want me, I would like to get out immediately.
EVR didnot ask such questions,whether one would permit him inside a place of worship or not?.. He forced and tresspassed , and set a revolutionay example, which has now become an accepted norm.. Similarly, if you have such a good conviction about your question, you should do it.
Whatever EVR preached, he preached it in his forums and never enterered into a place of worship and propagated his philosophies.
Did he tresspassed into a place of worship and preached his thoughts?
Knock every church and preach to prove to the Christians 'That JC is not a true God' and convince them.. Is'nt it a good idea to stop conversions of Christians and moslems?
I don't have to convince any body on anything. I am not trying to stop any conversions either. I know very well that any amount of money spent will not win hearts. Even Pope doesn't know the answer why only about 2% of the Indians have reposed faith in JC inspite of more than 200 years of Christian rule and enormous money spent through missioneries.
Some of the books I always read with interest are, Kancha Ilaiah,Davinci code, Satanic Verses... Also, I did not fail to buy those books which published counterviews also..
I have also read lot of books written by rationalists. Counter view is part of Hinduism from time immemorial. I don't have to learn from you about all this.
But in my personal view, if you feel and fully convinced that JC is not God, you should go all out to prove your point. Why just in a church, you should even knock the doors of Vatican and try to prove your point. Absolutely, there is nothing wrong in it, and Im saying this in true spirits.
You are only encroaching in to our territory and trying to convince us. I am not trying to convince anybody on anything. Then why should I knock anybody's door?
There are many a variety of religious people, who used to teach me with their subjects.. Some talk with convincing mode..Some talk with abusive mode.. some with offensive mode.. But I dont shut my doors or ears.. Rather, offer them a cup of coffee, understand what he has to say, any thing better than what I have, and if its good, I quickly pick them up, as a learning.. Thats my perspective, which may not go well with many of us..
The Obfuscator
Obstructing the path of truth
Methods and manners all uncouth
He, who cannot stand the test
Is the one who is an obscurantist
Purpose of dialogue is to reason
Denying this is to commit treason
He is ever willing and ready to rush
To obscure and beat around the bush
He is a shame for the humanity
Has neither value nor any sanity
Long Litany doesn’t win any respect
Will he, the obfuscator ever introspect ?