This thread contains interesting information, thanks to Smt VR for finding many interesting items to share with members here. I decided to share my thoughts here now.
Today I found that this thread may have been used for its unintended purposes.
1. The age old question often debated, including in this forum elsewhere as well is - "Did Rama worship Siva at Rameswaram? "
Answer 1 - Who cares? why care? Only delusional devotees will care for such things because if one leverages one's Viveka and understands what
- Rama (Personification of Dharma among other attributes) and
- Siva (personification of change/Time, auspiciousness among other attributes)
stand for there are no issues to debate. .
So we must answer the religiously inclined often deluded devotee's perspective (let me use abbreviation DD for short). I do not want to deal with any actual DD so the disclaimer is that it does not refer to any specific member here though people doing self identification is not in my control!
2. DD - show me proof ? Valmiki Ramayana is the authority about Rama - show where it says Rama worshipped Siva
Answer 2 - You are right that Valmiki Ramayana does not say anywhere that Rama worshipped Siva.
However you may know that Ramayana comprises about 24000 verses and there is another scripture called 'Yoga Vasistha' that is about 32000 verses and also authored by Valmiki.
Yoga Vasistha is teaching of Vedanta to Sri rama by his Guru (Rishi) Vasishta, through many dramatic stories. It comprises of six chapters.
In the Nirvana Prakarana, in part 1, Vasishta who teaches about Lord Siva as well as describe how he worshipped Lord Siva. He goes on to talk about his conversation with Lord Siva one day after which Vasishta talks about how his mode of worship and devotion to the Lord Siva changed as a result of his encounter with Lord Siva. This description of conversation with Lord Siva goes on for many verses. Rama was taught early on about worshipping Siva and it was described by Valmiki.
3. DD - That is no proof at all. How do we know it is the same Valmiki, how do we know it is the same Rama?
Answer 3 - You have to understand that Ramayana is a Itihasa ("it happened this way") and is not a history document.
In fact the Hinduism is not a History centric religion. History & record keeping is an alien idea to Hindus.
Taking scriptures such as Ramayana and
arguing about some historical accuracy is for losers.
The scripture teaches us about what it means to lead a life of Dharma. If tomorrow the entire plot was somehow shown to be incorrect the value of Ramayana is not diminished by one iota.
The biblical religions are entirely based on specific historical figures and their actions. They will be lost if somehow it was shown that the history is wrong. This is not the case for Hinduism.
Reasonable people will agree that Ramayana was based on a historical figure but Ramayana was written embellishing the facts to make it more interesting. Just because it mentioned a Vimanam does not mean it is a definitive proof that there were planes those days. The strength of our scriptures is that they are
not historical documents.
4. DD - What do you have against history? Key facts such as Rama worshipping Siva at Rameswaram is not described in Valmiki Ramayana. It is afterall about a historical person and his actions. Why would it leave this out? It must be a latter day addition.
Answer 4 History is created by human intellect and is limited in its scope. The teaching of Vedas (knowledge sections) embedded in Mahabharatha, Ramayana, Yoga Vasishta do not have origin in human intellect but revealed by intuition of Rishis (
and verifiable by us today, so they are not delusions) . The teaching part has value for our growth here and now.
The historical facts are irrelevant and could be even wrong.
Assuming that a DD wants to take this Valmiki Ramayana as source for history, it is not clear why it should be considered authoritative. After all it has been handed down over many eons and it is possible sections could have been deleted in the transmission.
Similarly we do not know why Rameswaram has large number of Siva temples and hardly any temple for Sri Rama ( I can be corrected but that is my recollection from visiting the place in mid 1970s).
If there is a belief in Valmiki Ramayana as representation of facts, then there is nothing to say it is superior to practice of Siva worship and historical stories associated with Rameswaram temples.
5. DD - The story that Rama worshipping Siva is offensive to some of the Vaishnavites though they have nothing against Siva.
Answer 5 OK, then do not believe those stories. Let others believe what they want. You tell what you want to followers of your tradition. Let others say what they want. Hinduism can accommodate all kinds of ideas. But reflect on this. The rituals and various decorations we put on are only useful when the significance of the rituals and the decorations (Namam etc) have a significance to our personal growth to be closer to Isvara.
There is a danger that 'historical facts' of stories, and traditions can easily make a fake person . This is a historical problem and well articulated by a poet over 1000 years ago. Let me provide the words of the poet about such people. Do not become one such person.
நட்டகல்லைத் தெய்வமென்றுநாலுபுஷ்பந் சாத்தியே
சுற்றிவந்து முணமுணென்றுசொல்லு மந்திரம் ஏதடா
நட்டகல்லும் பேசுமோ நாதனுள்ளிருக்கையில்
சுட்டசட்டி சட்டுவம்கறிச்சுவை அறியுமோ
சட்டையிட்டு மணிதுலங்கும் சாத்திரச் சழக்கரே
பொத்தகத்தை மெத்தவைத்துப் போதமோதும் பொய்யரே
நிட்டைஏது ஞானமேது? நீரிருந்த அட்சரம்
பட்டைஏது? சொல்லீரே பாதகக் கபடரே?
6. DD - These poems convey nothing - and You are egotistical and out of control!
Answer 6 May Lord Rama give you peace of mind!! OM