thanks to some free promotion, i got to watch the show live a few days ago.
i did not want to make any comments here earlier, because the first few were all emotional responses to a clarion call by another emotional poster.
it reminded me of jamadagneya's hysteria a few weeks ago, where even thinking persons, whom i normally credit with balanced minds, immediately jumped up to join his bandwagon, without as much discussion of many of his senseless harangue.
this is the type of call, that we, as thinking brahmins, should watch ourselves against. just because someone with an agenda of his own, screams from the rooftops, that hinduism is in danger, it does mean that it is true.
it is in times like these, that we sit back, learn to count to a million, and then reflect on the issue, the evidence and enter a debate. to jump into conclusion by signing petitions (which only gives these guys your email address for future use to beg support for causes or money), i think, does not reflect well of us, as mature human beings and part of a mature community, whose erudition we all claim to be part.
i have great respect for the likes of swami, venkat, pann etc and do see eye to eye on many issues, and where i disagree, i have great respect for their logic and reasoning.
however, i wish, in this instance, as i had wished re jamadagneya, they had withheld their support, till such time, as to have a full debate as to the content of the vijay tv program.
what part of the program did they object:
- the topic itself ?(that would be thaliban - a la hari )
- the manner in which it was conducted (covertly anti hindu message?)
- the person gopinath (somebody said he was christian - so we do not want a christian to moderate a hindu subject?)
- the sight of women removing thalis in front of public
- overall we feel that hinduism is getting a bum rap these days, and this is yet another manifestation of such - even though this program may not be so bad
we have to think through the content and presentation. also compare this with the reality of today.
what do our women in general feel about thali? is it emotional? or ornamental? or indifference? or a sign of subservience?
i myself have felt since my teen that thali is முள்வேலி and on the first day of wedding itself, told my wife, that it was her prerogative to do as she wishes with this chain.
i used to have a pillai christian neighbour. they had thali too. the women removed thali on widowhood. they considered thali sacred, much to the surprise of my mom.
i remember pillai mami telling my mom, 'எங்களுக்கும் தாலிலே நம்பிக்கை உண்டு'. that is what it comes to நம்பிக்கை ie faith.
i had no faith in it. i left it to my wife as i felt justified, it was a chain that could mean many things. it was resting on her body.
i was only putting myself in her position. had she put a thaali on me, and insisted that i wear it all the time, i would have resented. it only felt fair, to reciprocate my sense of fairness.
back to vijay tv.
had it not been for this thread here, i would have forgotten what i thought was a mildly teasing t.v. program, which was well conducted, and basically, i did not see anyone visibly upset for blasphemying hinduism or its tenets.
another mini storm in a teacup.
i did not want to make any comments here earlier, because the first few were all emotional responses to a clarion call by another emotional poster.
it reminded me of jamadagneya's hysteria a few weeks ago, where even thinking persons, whom i normally credit with balanced minds, immediately jumped up to join his bandwagon, without as much discussion of many of his senseless harangue.
this is the type of call, that we, as thinking brahmins, should watch ourselves against. just because someone with an agenda of his own, screams from the rooftops, that hinduism is in danger, it does mean that it is true.
it is in times like these, that we sit back, learn to count to a million, and then reflect on the issue, the evidence and enter a debate. to jump into conclusion by signing petitions (which only gives these guys your email address for future use to beg support for causes or money), i think, does not reflect well of us, as mature human beings and part of a mature community, whose erudition we all claim to be part.
i have great respect for the likes of swami, venkat, pann etc and do see eye to eye on many issues, and where i disagree, i have great respect for their logic and reasoning.
however, i wish, in this instance, as i had wished re jamadagneya, they had withheld their support, till such time, as to have a full debate as to the content of the vijay tv program.
what part of the program did they object:
- the topic itself ?(that would be thaliban - a la hari )
- the manner in which it was conducted (covertly anti hindu message?)
- the person gopinath (somebody said he was christian - so we do not want a christian to moderate a hindu subject?)
- the sight of women removing thalis in front of public
- overall we feel that hinduism is getting a bum rap these days, and this is yet another manifestation of such - even though this program may not be so bad
we have to think through the content and presentation. also compare this with the reality of today.
what do our women in general feel about thali? is it emotional? or ornamental? or indifference? or a sign of subservience?
i myself have felt since my teen that thali is முள்வேலி and on the first day of wedding itself, told my wife, that it was her prerogative to do as she wishes with this chain.
i used to have a pillai christian neighbour. they had thali too. the women removed thali on widowhood. they considered thali sacred, much to the surprise of my mom.
i remember pillai mami telling my mom, 'எங்களுக்கும் தாலிலே நம்பிக்கை உண்டு'. that is what it comes to நம்பிக்கை ie faith.
i had no faith in it. i left it to my wife as i felt justified, it was a chain that could mean many things. it was resting on her body.
i was only putting myself in her position. had she put a thaali on me, and insisted that i wear it all the time, i would have resented. it only felt fair, to reciprocate my sense of fairness.
back to vijay tv.
had it not been for this thread here, i would have forgotten what i thought was a mildly teasing t.v. program, which was well conducted, and basically, i did not see anyone visibly upset for blasphemying hinduism or its tenets.
another mini storm in a teacup.