Dear Shri Nara,
What little i know reg northern indians is from atleast 10 years back. Back then, i remember some ppl (or a few outliers in those groups) who took great delight in ridiculing the ways of the madrasis whenever they got a chance.
Comes to me my mind now...in a gathering i remember one pandya guy was so angry that a madrasi (narasimha rao) was a PM. I hardly remember all those rants about 'madrasis' now, but one comment seems to have lingered in my memory "ab in saalon ke liye sansad mein idli dosa banate honge"...i remember that topics switched, but often came back to southies with everone making fun of southies on their accent, food, coconut oil stories...
So far i have come across northie-southie mixed marriages but only among southies who lived all their lives in north india or vice-versa (and not a single one of them is an arranged marriage - and that makes a big diff i think)...
Today things might be diff. There is far more interaction b/w ppl. Yet this overwhelming sense of superiority might exist in some ppl or some sections...i dunno...
Imo, a northie female wud readily marry a southie male (as an arranged marriage)- but only if she does not get a good guy within her own northie lot.
However, today the challenge is not in getting ppl married (to me most comments on this thread are myopic) - rather it is in getting ppl to remain married.
Divorce is a stark reality. A couple cannot remain maried for the sake of caste, to please anyone or for anything else, unless they themselves have a fondness for one another (which unfortunately in an arranged marrige cud depend heavily on the in-laws, relatives and all 3rd parties)..
After the honeymoon period is over, the grind of the daily life and its travails can result in splitting even the most adjusting couple apart.
I read somewhere in this forum abt 45% divorce cases..
While females are extremely carrer oriented these days, am not sure females wud really jeopardize their lives by seeking divorce unless there is some 'real' problem..i sincerely hope females themselves speak up on an other thread (by the way, renu and amala, where are u ladies..please come back soon )..
Anyways Shri Nara, all this talk is not going to help settle a whopping number of guys (i really do not know what is the solution). Imo, it wud be tuf to find females who have remained unmarried beyond the age of 30 unless
a) there is a problem at home or with the lady
b) some ladies prefer to be independent and do not want to consider marriage ever, or;
c) if the female prefers to wait for the right guy rather than compromising..
d) or if the female is a free-spirit with no fixed ideas abt marriage..(i know of a journalist in a travelling job loving life with no regrets..)..
Am not sure ladies from any of those categories wud suit the orthodoxy here...
happy,
i agree with you of the general perception of the madrasi in the north. my own impressions are dated (70s) and that was the time when overwhelming madrasis in the north were TB (i think). i think part of it was jealousy of upward mobility, part envy and part racist.
not sure if that is an issue now, considering most of the present day migration from tamil nadu to the north is non brahmin (mostly civil servants i would imagine + armed forces).
i agree with you that the discussions here may be myopic, but there is nothing wrong with that. this thread addresses a sharply defined problem, of a class of TBs, who i suspect are more conservative than the average (i may be wrong here), and who have an almost life threatening issue - marriage of a beloved son.
that these people have been at it for over 5 years on a average, we can safely assume, and out of this experience has come a sense of hopelessness, anger and frustration.
those that can surmounted the caste obstacle, would have already found a way out - marry out of caste. those are not represented here and all the more glory to them.
what we have is the dregs - bottom most leftover, though none of them would like to be considered such, and even i have a qualm using this term, but i feel is accurate.
why do we care? because these are our own tribe. misguided? maybe. racist? maybe. narrow minded? maybe. but these are still our own, and you might have inferred that the attitude of most of the initiators here, is to help this group, 'inspite of''.
so what is the targe bridal group. definitely not the high achieving self confident college educated career oriented female. most probably, lower/mid middle class, educated (degree maybe), facing the awesome reality of huge dowries (still very much a reality in the north) and above all eagerness to get married.
every arranged marriage, is an arrangement of economics and contract,, even though a lot of words are attributed to divine intervention and 'made in heaven' utterings. this is yet another one of those economic and social based arrangement, based on the realities of the society, norms, gender scarcity, but believing in a kinship to a different community based on ancient traditions and forebears.
anyone can question the validity. but nobody can argue, that this is a task centred movement, with specific goals in mind. at this point this is only a concept. we do not know if the helpees here would be willing to accept the terms. rvr projects a max of 10%.
personally, i feel, for those 30+ TB boys. these, who had trusted their parents to find them spouses. i was one such person, once upon a time. i had absolutely no skills to find a mate, and i feel, that this aspect of skill acquiring was deliberately exorcised by my upbringing. so i feel for them. for their parents, i have no feelings.
this is my take on this initiative, happy. i wish it the best, just only, for the sake of those boys. i do not believe, in this age, any girl willing to enter into such an alignment, is as innocent as we fear and getting trapped. such an arguement can be made for any arranged marriage.