• This forum contains old posts that have been closed. New threads and replies may not be made here. Please navigate to the relevant forum to create a new thread or post a reply.
  • Welcome to Tamil Brahmins forums.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our Free Brahmin Community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Am I going astray?

Status
Not open for further replies.
IMHO, these terms like mootthaal and ilayal are a blot upon humanity, and, of course, the very idea of a bramin exclusive aghraharam.

Dear Nara ji,

I am not a TB but I wonder what is so wrong about a Brahmin exclusive Agraharam?

After all doesn't a person have the choice to live in a place that he or she would feel comfortable?

As I said earlier in a post..that I prefer having monkeys as my neighbours..so what is so wrong if a Brahmin only wants Brahmins as his neighbours??

After all I can safely say you truly like this "Online Agraharam"(Forum)!LOL
 
Last edited:
hi renu,

its true ...its advaitham tooo...some ppl ..when they enjoy with PERIYA VEEDU and thinking abt CHINNA VEEDU....LOOKLIKE

JEEVATMA/PARAMATMA AIKYAM.....ABHEDHATVAM......LOL

TBS garu,

Imagine if you had written this in your Phd in Advaita..your professors would have got a heart attack!LOL
 
TBS garu,

Imagine if you had written this in your Phd in Advaita..your professors would have got a heart attack!LOL
hi renu

just ph d thesis is different...i apply my ABHEDHAVADHAM everywhere....in my day to day life....we live in dual nature and

feeling as advaitha in practice........many ppl think that CIHINNA VEEDU IS JEEVATMA AND PERIYA VEEDU AS PARAMATMA IN DAILY LIFE...LOL
 
Which of the two is jivatma or paramatma may vary and debatable, the third entity is definitely powerless prakruti!

hi renu

just ph d thesis is different...i apply my ABHEDHAVADHAM everywhere....in my day to day life....we live in dual nature and

feeling as advaitha in practice........many ppl think that CIHINNA VEEDU IS JEEVATMA AND PERIYA VEEDU AS PARAMATMA IN DAILY LIFE...LOL
 
Which of the two is jivatma or paramatma may vary and debatable, the third entity is definitely powerless prakruti!

3rd entity??
Not entirely powerless..but just waiting for its turn since there is a threesome here!
 
When I was in a small town as a teen..I remember a place called Taman Yarl(Yarl Garden) where it was a private property where those of Sri Lankan Tamil descend stayed there.They never rented their houses out to non Sri Lankan Tamils.

It was their very own Sri Lankan Tamil Pettai..so you see humans like to stay among people who are alike in thought and behavior..so I can understand if anyone wants to stay in an Agraharam.
 
Last edited:
I am sure none of you guys have seen a full fledged 1st wife and 2nd wife fight!

I once had a stop 2 wives from fighting when both came for treatment cos of injury sustained from earlier Sakkalati Sandai.

Then later I told the husband to make sure this does not occur again and he told me that he was planning for wife No 3 cos he needed peace of mind cos 1st and 2nd were always fighting!LOL
 
he told me that he was planning for wife No 3 cos he needed peace of mind cos 1st and 2nd were always fighting!LOL

Mam,

Nice decision for peace seeker. But, what is the guarantee that the third won’t prove to be a third degree LOL!
 
Good thinking. There will be a three cornered fight and the gentleman will be looking for a fourth.

My landlord in college days had two wives; the elder one had no children and the younger, a girl and a boy. Even though the wives had separate houses about a kilometer apart, there was lot of coming and going and generally peaceful atmosphere.

I am sure none of you guys have seen a full fledged 1st wife and 2nd wife fight!

I once had a stop 2 wives from fighting when both came for treatment cos of injury sustained from earlier Sakkalati Sandai.

Then later I told the husband to make sure this does not occur again and he told me that he was planning for wife No 3 cos he needed peace of mind cos 1st and 2nd were always fighting!LOL
 
There are several other advantages that Agraharam engenders...

When people are together then IC & IR interactions leading to romance and marriage will be limited...

Tho' there could be interactions in office or in colleges, the Agraharam lifestyle will make a person think twice before venturing outside the community

Most of IC & IR marriages are happening in Metros where Agraharam is not there...

I am not sure if the converse is 100% true..

But we can make a beginning somewhere
 
There are several other advantages that Agraharam engenders...

When people are together then IC & IR interactions leading to romance and marriage will be limited...

Tho' there could be interactions in office or in colleges, the Agraharam lifestyle will make a person think twice before venturing outside the community

Most of IC & IR marriages are happening in Metros where Agraharam is not there...

I am not sure if the converse is 100% true..

But we can make a beginning somewhere

I should not ask for the poster's age, but statements like this shows the age. Forget about IR, IC marriage, is there anybody who wants to marry such an old person?
Ask any young person, where they want to live, and if they want an agraharam please let them live there. In the waning years of our life living near any dear friend should be welcome. People should be free to live where they will be happy, and their family will be happy to visit.
 
I should not ask for the poster's age, but statements like this shows the age. Forget about IR, IC marriage, is there anybody who wants to marry such an old person?
Ask any young person, where they want to live, and if they want an agraharam please let them live there. In the waning years of our life living near any dear friend should be welcome. People should be free to live where they will be happy, and their family will be happy to visit.

dear prasad,

i would guess vgane is over 60.

his solution to prevent ir/ic marriages is very similar to those of ramadoss and gounder caste organizations, who feel that dalit youth provide a 'love trap' for their girls.

someone suggested, that vanniar/gounder girls might go for their own caste boys, if these boys behaved better, held responsible jobs, did not drink to death and treated their women with respect.

our own boys, i think, need to have a little more panache, little more independence from their parents, learn to interact with girls (dont know where though since these have been brought up to think even talking with girls a sin).

anyways, i agree with your thought. if someone wants to live with only brahmins, let them. i only fear, that very soon it may have taliban tendencies - people checking if you do your sandhi three times a day or be required to come up with a written doctor's letter if you miss a pradhosham or rudram chant :). very much like the agraharamic behaviour of yore. !!

also wonder how many of the wives of the old fogies here who yearn for agraharam living, would accompany them.
 
I should not ask for the poster's age, but statements like this shows the age. Forget about IR, IC marriage, is there anybody who wants to marry such an old person?
Ask any young person, where they want to live, and if they want an agraharam please let them live there. In the waning years of our life living near any dear friend should be welcome. People should be free to live where they will be happy, and their family will be happy to visit.

Have you gone and checked the ages of people who have booked for the Vedic Agraharam in Bengalooru?
 
dear prasad,

i would guess vgane is over 60.

his solution to prevent ir/ic marriages is very similar to those of ramadoss and gounder caste organizations, who feel that dalit youth provide a 'love trap' for their girls.

someone suggested, that vanniar/gounder girls might go for their own caste boys, if these boys behaved better, held responsible jobs, did not drink to death and treated their women with respect.

our own boys, i think, need to have a little more panache, little more independence from their parents, learn to interact with girls (dont know where though since these have been brought up to think even talking with girls a sin).

anyways, i agree with your thought. if someone wants to live with only brahmins, let them. i only fear, that very soon it may have taliban tendencies - people checking if you do your sandhi three times a day or be required to come up with a written doctor's letter if you miss a pradhosham or rudram chant :). very much like the agraharamic behaviour of yore. !!

also wonder how many of the wives of the old fogies here who yearn for agraharam living, would accompany them.

You may be 80+ but I think and the discerning audience will understand and appreciate that those who care 2 hoots for Brahmin culture, tradition and religion in foreign shores would have no concern for Brahmins., what to say about advocating where Brahmins should stay...Such people will offer lip service for the community which will be detrimental in the long run.
 
There is agraharam in Vakuntam or any other place where we are going after this life.
If an agraharam is in Dharavi, how many of the brahmins will stay there. Economic, and other consideration take priority when selecting a site for home. All other considerations will wreck the future.
 
Can anyone kindly explain to me the hazards of staying at an Agraharam??

Why is it viewed so negatively?

Does staying in an Agraharam makes one a casteist?

These days people choose the houses based on the economic status of the neighbours..a fancy postal code..a so called elite area. etc..

I have a doctor friend who stays in a posh golf course club house mansion out here in Msia..he drives the most expensive cars and he is such a nice guy who does so much charity and sponsors free surgeries to restore eye sight to blind kids too..living in posh area did not make him arrogant..

So I just wonder why is living in an Agraharam not considered a positive choice.

For God's sake can anyone kindly explain to me..everyone is just saying its not a good choice but no one is saying what are the drawbacks.
 
I am not a TB but I wonder what is so wrong about a Brahmin exclusive Agraharam?

After all doesn't a person have the choice to live in a place that he or she would feel comfortable?
Renuka,
The above view seems very reasonable, of course who could be against a person having the choice to live in a place he/she feels comfortable about.

But I would like to peel this facade and dig a little deeper. Why do these people feel comfort in living in a Brahmin exclusive agraharam? Why were they so eager to leave an already existing Brahmin exclusive agraharam in the village to live in a metro with everyone for the sake of money? Now, having voluntarily left agraharam life for the sake of few Gandhi, why do they now nurse a nostalgic longing for that they voluntarily left behind? I have already posed these questions, but there is no answer, only vengeful ad hominems.

I have lived in agraharams, both in village where there was no toilet at home even in the back (புழக்கடை) and in towns with "modern" dry toilets in the back. I have lived that life first hand. Some people here have fertile imagination of Vedic village, etc., but I know that most agraharams when I was growing up, which was many decades ago, and even at that time, had no veda phatasalai and the life was not pristine. Only poor Brahmin families opted for veda pathasala and they had to send their kids away. The residents of agraharam were crass and uncouth, gossip mongering, shouting at each other, wife-beating, fighting holding each other's குடிமி style. Yes, there were some learned people, but they had their own failings, somewhat a glimse of it shown in the movie Dharm. However, most residents couldn't care less for the ideals Brahmins like to tout. They were satisfied to live on the labor of others and complain about the குத்தகைக்காரன் (tenant farmer) not giving what they are owed.

It is routine in these agraharams to refer to any NB as சூத்ரன்/சூத்ரச்சி. Toilet cleaners are not allowed to enter the main street, they had go to the back "street" kind of like the parking lane we find in some neighborhoods with their parking garage in the back of the house. This back street is an open sewer. They enter through this sewer lane, remove the shit, carry it on their head and egress. This was also a part of agraharam life, unseen and unrecognized.

Fear and hatred of IC/IR is one of the reasons they want to go back to this agraharam life style, they have said so many times. You being a progeny of an IC, it is bizarre that you find their desire for exclusivity understandable. Do you realize you won't be allowed to even enter the kind of agraharam these people are so nostalgically reminiscing about? You will be considered an avarna, not fit for the four-fold categories who are permitted to live in the கிராமம் (gramam) within their individual exclusive zone.

In a modern aghraharam -- if these people ever go back and establish one, which is very doubtful, a snow flake has a better chance of survival in hell -- you will of course be welcome, with all the Gandhi you can wave at them. They may even approvingly declare, இவளோட அம்மா பிராமணா தெரியுமோனோ.

So, I hope you get a sense why I feel it is so wrong for rational and compassionate people to mouth these exclusivity dreams.

After all I can safely say you truly like this "Online Agraharam"(Forum)!LOL
You are wrong about this, your LOL not withstanding. This site is open for everyone, the owner says so everytime there is a challenge to this idea.

What I like is the opportunity to rebut some of these supremacist views, and the occasional exchange of ideas that is becoming very rare. I hate these garbage throwing that has become so predictable these days. Nobody even tries to put up an argument. For example, I have stated some really strong stuff above. I challenge all these people to put up an argument about what I have stated without telling me I am BB, hatemogering, etc. The most I can expect though is silence from many, ad hominem attack from a few, cheering the personal attacks from the rest.

There are some here who do nothing but copy/paste, there is nothing wrong with that, but if anyone says anything that is contrary to widely accepted inane and banal bromides, these guys come down saying BS, HS, pissing and such. This is the quality of debate that has become common place.

Well, I try my best to stay clear of many posts and carefully pick and chose when and where to express my views, which I will continue to do and will gladly engage in reasonable debate if it is free of name calling. Otherwise, I am happy to remain the gadfly of this forum, thank you very much!!!

Thanks ...
 
Renuka,
The above view seems very reasonable, of course who could be against a person having the choice to live in a place he/she feels comfortable about.

But I would like to peel this facade and dig a little deeper. Why do these people feel comfort in living in a Brahmin exclusive agraharam? Why were they so eager to leave an already existing Brahmin exclusive agraharam in the village to live in a metro with everyone for the sake of money? Now, having voluntarily left agraharam life for the sake of few Gandhi, why do they now nurse a nostalgic longing for that they voluntarily left behind? I have already posed these questions, but there is no answer, only vengeful ad hominems.

I have lived in agraharams, both in village where there was no toilet at home even in the back (புழக்கடை) and in towns with "modern" dry toilets in the back. I have lived that life first hand. Some people here have fertile imagination of Vedic village, etc., but I know that most agraharams when I was growing up, which was many decades ago, and even at that time, had no veda phatasalai and the life was not pristine. Only poor Brahmin families opted for veda pathasala and they had to send their kids away. The residents of agraharam were crass and uncouth, gossip mongering, shouting at each other, wife-beating, fighting holding each other's குடிமி style. Yes, there were some learned people, but they had their own failings, somewhat a glimse of it shown in the movie Dharm. However, most residents couldn't care less for the ideals Brahmins like to tout. They were satisfied to live on the labor of others and complain about the குத்தகைக்காரன் (tenant farmer) not giving what they are owed.

It is routine in these agraharams to refer to any NB as சூத்ரன்/சூத்ரச்சி. Toilet cleaners are not allowed to enter the main street, they had go to the back "street" kind of like the parking lane we find in some neighborhoods with their parking garage in the back of the house. This back street is an open sewer. They enter through this sewer lane, remove the shit, carry it on their head and egress. This was also a part of agraharam life, unseen and unrecognized.

Fear and hatred of IC/IR is one of the reasons they want to go back to this agraharam life style, they have said so many times. You being a progeny of an IC, it is bizarre that you find their desire for exclusivity understandable. Do you realize you won't be allowed to even enter the kind of agraharam these people are so nostalgically reminiscing about? You will be considered an avarna, not fit for the four-fold categories who are permitted to live in the கிராமம் (gramam) within their individual exclusive zone.

In a modern aghraharam -- if these people ever go back and establish one, which is very doubtful, a snow flake has a better chance of survival in hell -- you will of course be welcome, with all the Gandhi you can wave at them. They may even approvingly declare, இவளோட அம்மா பிராமணா தெரியுமோனோ.

So, I hope you get a sense why I feel it is so wrong for rational and compassionate people to mouth these exclusivity dreams.

I agree with much of what Shri Nara has written. The lack of latrines, manual scavenging, etc., may not be there if a brand new "agrahaaram" of brahmins does come up anywhere. One may not also find people fighting holding each other's குடிமி style, in future - unless a trend of growing healthy kuDumi starts afresh, which is rather unlikely, according to me.

This craving for agrahaaram style life, if I may call it so, happens, in my view, because of a misplaced notion that if once we can get back to an old-world kind of agrahaaram, then we will be able to turn the clock back in time and presto! with that one simple stroke all of us will become the old, pure brahmins. This obviously will never happen. That is where this notion or dream appears to be flawed.

You are wrong about this, your LOL not withstanding. This site is open for everyone, the owner says so everytime there is a challenge to this idea.

What I like is the opportunity to rebut some of these supremacist views, and the occasional exchange of ideas that is becoming very rare. I hate these garbage throwing that has become so predictable these days. Nobody even tries to put up an argument. For example, I have stated some really strong stuff above. I challenge all these people to put up an argument about what I have stated without telling me I am BB, hatemogering, etc. The most I can expect though is silence from many, ad hominem attack from a few, cheering the personal attacks from the rest.

There are some here who do nothing but copy/paste, there is nothing wrong with that, but if anyone says anything that is contrary to widely accepted inane and banal bromides, these guys come down saying BS, HS, pissing and such. This is the quality of debate that has become common place.

Well, I try my best to stay clear of many posts and carefully pick and chose when and where to express my views, which I will continue to do and will gladly engage in reasonable debate if it is free of name calling. Otherwise, I am happy to remain the gadfly of this forum, thank you very much!!!

Thanks ...

I being one of the persons branded as BB, it looks to me that whenever our anti-BB gang finds it difficult to argue on points, based logically, they including the "wordster" start their ad hominem attack. It looks to be beyond their ability to control that urge and some of the borderline members (who usually enter the scene when the fight is mostly over - like the police in Indian films! - seems to consider his name calling and abusive posts as a "punya kainkaryam". I don't know whether any faction of brahmanism has supported this kind of a notion of punya kainkaryam.
 
For all the pontifications that these guys do, these guys indulge in ad-hominem attacks as much as anyone else. The only thing this is their hypocrisy is blinding enough for them to indulge in such attacks while simultaneously claim how they despise such attacks.

Take, for example, some portions from the above post:

Why were they so eager to leave an already existing Brahmin exclusive agraharam in the village to live in a metro with everyone for the sake of money? Now, having voluntarily left agraharam life for the sake of few Gandhi, why do they now nurse a nostalgic longing for that they voluntarily left behind?

So someone voluntarily leaving agraharam cannot yearn to go back to agraharam? Do they would have to explain away all these silly questions that these hypocrites raise if they want to write they would like to live in an agraharam? If an NRI person wants to return back to India, would he be condescendingly asked why he wants to return to India since he left this country for the sake of few washington? I think people should have the right to remain silent instead of trying to reply to every such silly poser.

They were satisfied to live on the labor of others and complain about the குத்தகைக்காரன் (tenant farmer) not giving what they are owed.

This is a hate filled passage. It is because of these reasons that these people are called out as hatemongers. The poster is trying to create an impression that the members here who write about wanting to live in agraharam would all be living on "others labor" as he puts it. It is these sort of put-downs on members who come and write here that should be condemned by anyone.

Toilet cleaners are not allowed to enter the main street, they had go to the back "street" kind of like the parking lane we find in some neighborhoods with their parking garage in the back of the house. This back street is an open sewer. They enter through this sewer lane, remove the shit, carry it on their head and egress. This was also a part of agraharam life, unseen and unrecognized.

This carrying out shit from dry latrines was not unique to agraharams. There are people who are still subjected to do such tasks outside agraharams. Modern agraharams will most certainly not have these kind of dry latrines. The only people who repeatedly like to call NBs "சூத்ரன்/சூத்ரச்சி" in this forum are these BBs themselves.

I being one of the persons branded as BB, it looks to me that whenever our anti-BB gang finds it difficult to argue on points, based logically, they including the "wordster" start their ad hominem attack. .


The fact is all these self-praising types think they are making an reasoned argument while all along these are the people who indulge in wild generalizations and ad-hominem attacks against other members and then they rejoice, wallowing in their own imagined glory, that there was no logical rebuttal to these attacks.
 
Welcome, but waste of energy. Tail cannot be straightened nor voice muffled. Chelas are worse than the forgotten master. Full of hatred and filth.

But they are so few in number and so disconnected from society, their verbal diarrhea cannot pollute normal society. Brahmins will flourish and contribute their might to the welfare of others and the nation.

I intend to write a reply to post # 69. Just give me some time. Thanks.
 
Last edited:
The above view seems very reasonable, of course who could be against a person having the choice to live in a place he/she feels comfortable about.

But I would like to peel this facade and dig a little deeper. Why do these people feel comfort in living in a Brahmin exclusive agraharam? Why were they so eager to leave an already existing Brahmin exclusive agraharam in the village to live in a metro with everyone for the sake of money? Now, having voluntarily left agraharam life for the sake of few Gandhi, why do they now nurse a nostalgic longing for that they voluntarily left behind? I have already posed these questions, but there is no answer, only vengeful ad hominems.

I do not expect any certificate that what I am writing is not ad hominem.

How many times should we say that brahmins are not demigods and so they were also subject to the pressures of changing time. They left the agraharams for the very same economic reason for which the NBs moved from villages towards the cities and towns. If this is ad hominem let it be. I don't care. If they left for a few Gandhis others in far larger numbers migrated for the same few gandhis. They nurse a nostalgic longing for that agraharam life because of the obnoxiousness and tension of the city life these days. It does not require great amount of excitement of the cerebral cortex to understand these simple secular facts.

I have lived in agraharams, both in village where there was no toilet at home even in the back (புழக்கடை) and in towns with "modern" dry toilets in the back. I have lived that life first hand. Some people here have fertile imagination of Vedic village, etc., but I know that most agraharams when I was growing up, which was many decades ago, and even at that time, had no veda phatasalai and the life was not pristine. Only poor Brahmin families opted for veda pathasala and they had to send their kids away. The residents of agraharam were crass and uncouth, gossip mongering, shouting at each other, wife-beating, fighting holding each other's குடிமி style. Yes, there were some learned people, but they had their own failings, somewhat a glimse of it shown in the movie Dharm. However, most residents couldn't care less for the ideals Brahmins like to tout. They were satisfied to live on the labor of others and complain about the குத்தகைக்காரன் (tenant farmer) not giving what they are owed.

Others here who are writing also write out of personal experience. So there is no locus standi to accuse people here of fertile imaginations when it comes to their experience in an agraharam. My village too did not have a veda patashala but a nearby town had one to which students went from my village. I would venture to say that the statement that brahmins in the agraharams were all (or most of them) crass and uncouth, gossip mongering,wife-beating,indulging in குடுமிப்பிடி சண்டை is coming from a warped mind which does not have a sense of proportion in judging observed facts. Quoting a film also indicates that this peculiar mind gets far more comfort in make believe world. LOL.

Now coming to the accusation about living on the labor of others, and being an enjoyer of rent from the tenants, it flies in the face of modern economics. If a brahmin in a village who owned (legally) lands, let it out to share croppers for a rent to be paid in grains, it is living on the labour of others. If I hold investments in Tata Electric Co., Dr. Reddy's Labs, Cognizant Technologies etc and earn dividend from these investments it is honourable living. With ESOPs even the hard boiled communist trade union leaders of these companies(if at all they are there) would laugh at you if you tell them that they should sell all their shares because it is living out of the labour of others. What was the rent paid by the share cropper குத்தகைக்காரன் those days is today's dividend and bonus shares electronically credited to your demat and bank accounts. It is another story that these share croppers every year cheated the brahmins telling cock and bull stories about the crop failure.

It is routine in these agraharams to refer to any NB as சூத்ரன்/சூத்ரச்சி. Toilet cleaners are not allowed to enter the main street, they had go to the back "street" kind of like the parking lane we find in some neighborhoods with their parking garage in the back of the house. This back street is an open sewer. They enter through this sewer lane, remove the shit, carry it on their head and egress. This was also a part of agraharam life, unseen and unrecognized.

At least brahmins referred to them as sudra or sudrachi even as other castes in the village called the panchamans and other low castes by far worse names with strong objectionable epithets. Brahmins called them by that name and stopped with that while the others after drinking a மொந்தை of கள் went in the night to those houses and demanded sexual slavery as a matter of right. The s@#t was carried in drums loaded on to two wheeler trolleys and so were carried away through the backyard road. The member here perhaps demands that the s@#t remover should have been honoured with the privilege to take it through the main road. Members here can judge what kind of a demand is this. And the s@#t removed the s@#t of every one in the village not only that of the brahmin 'chauvinist pigs'.

Fear and hatred of IC/IR is one of the reasons they want to go back to this agraharam life style, they have said so many times. You being a progeny of an IC, it is bizarre that you find their desire for exclusivity understandable. Do you realize you won't be allowed to even enter the kind of agraharam these people are so nostalgically reminiscing about? You will be considered an avarna, not fit for the four-fold categories who are permitted to live in the கிராமம் (gramam) within their individual exclusive zone.

Again this member appears to be living in a make believe world and depends too much on the movies for his info about life in the village or agraharam. Every one in the village except the panchaman was free to move any where in any street in the agraharam without any restriction. Panchaman was barred from entering any street with chappals on or with his towel on his shoulder. That has nothing to do with agraharam or the brahmins.

In a modern aghraharam -- if these people ever go back and establish one, which is very doubtful, a snow flake has a better chance of survival in hell -- you will of course be welcome, with all the Gandhi you can wave at them. They may even approvingly declare, இவளோட அம்மா பிராமணா தெரியுமோனோ.

Already such agraharams exist. Only they are vertical. Come to Chennai and visit exclusive brahmin residences in Mylapore, Triplicane or Mambalam. No such descrimination is practised there that is in the modern vertical agraharams. Victimhood is a mental disease indeed.

What I like is the opportunity to rebut some of these supremacist views, and the occasional exchange of ideas that is becoming very rare. I hate these garbage throwing that has become so predictable these days. Nobody even tries to put up an argument. For example, I have stated some really strong stuff above. I challenge all these people to put up an argument about what I have stated without telling me I am BB, hatemogering, etc. The most I can expect though is silence from many, ad hominem attack from a few, cheering the personal attacks from the rest.
There are some here who do nothing but copy/paste, there is nothing wrong with that, but if anyone says anything that is contrary to widely accepted inane and banal bromides, these guys come down saying BS, HS, pissing and such. This is the quality of debate that has become common place.
Well, I try my best to stay clear of many posts and carefully pick and chose when and where to express my views, which I will continue to do and will gladly engage in reasonable debate if it is free of name calling. Otherwise, I am happy to remain the gadfly of this forum, thank you very much!!!

I leave all this தன் நிலை விளக்கம் statements as mere denials as the member perhaps is in that mode now. Members here know where he stands.

Thanks.
 
Post # 70 for reference:

I being one of the persons branded as BB, it looks to me that whenever our anti-BB gang finds it difficult to argue on points, based logically, they including the "wordster" start their ad hominem attack. It looks to be beyond their ability to control that urge and some of the borderline members (who usually enter the scene when the fight is mostly over - like the police in Indian films! - seems to consider his name calling and abusive posts as a "punya kainkaryam". I don't know whether any faction of brahmanism has supported this kind of a notion of punya kainkaryam.

Summing up:

BBs have answers for every thing. The anti-BB gang does not have.

When this gang attacks it is ad hominem. When BBs bring a bucket and sprayer to the forum and spray paint the contents everywhere, it is service to humanity.

BBs do punya kainkaryam while anti BBs do a papa kainkaryam.

LOL.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Latest ads

Back
Top