N
Nara
Guest
If ad hominem is this: “Please note, ad hominem is to counter an argument by attacking the person making the argument”
1. Post #80 by Nara: “Your anger is blinding you”. Telling the counter party that he is angry and so blind is attacking him and not his views. And again read this - “No, you are twisting what I said and calling it hate. I am creating an impression(is) in your enraged mind. Anger has taken over rationality”. Perfect examples of ad hominem.
KB got angry (he has since admitted to this) with my arguments, and, instead of providing a rebuttal he constructed various straw men arguments to attack me as a hypocrite and hatemonger. To you, that and, telling him his anger is blinding him are on the same level. To me it is not.
The rest is about style of writing. There is nothing there where I said anything about KB that comes close to KB simply refusing to put forth a rebuttal of what I stated and repeatedly accusing me of hatemongering. You may find equivalency between these two, I don't.
I am ready and eager to engage anyone in a reasoned debate. I don't want to get into this kind of back-and-forth. Look at your own post, you have not addressed even one of the points I have been stating again and again, instead it is all about how you would have worded this or that and that. This is tiresome.Because this member has a tendency to always withdraw himself into a shell whenever he comes across strong, reasoned, logically presented counters to his arguments and accuse every one else of put downs, ad hominems, strawman argument etc.,