• This forum contains old posts that have been closed. New threads and replies may not be made here. Please navigate to the relevant forum to create a new thread or post a reply.
  • Welcome to Tamil Brahmins forums.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our Free Brahmin Community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Drums of war

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nara
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Dear Professor Nara Ji and others,

I owe a response here based on the Professor's response to my posting (as well to those who had responded in a corollary way). I got busy in my day job over the last few days. I will respond in detail during the forthcoming weekend, when I expect to have some free time available.

I apologize for the delay.

Regards,
KRS
 
An intelligent ruler,knows when to go on a offensive and when to go on a defensive during war time,his country is dealing with.Afghanistan is such a war.Iraq is a different war,wherein troops are stationed for a purpose,untill the purposes are acheived,the roles will be performed accordingly.

nachi naga.
 
Today I read an article by Sri G Parthasarathi, Ex High Commissioner of Indian Embassy at Pakistan.

I am unable to get the weblink of the article but main points are

1. President Obama doesn't have a clearcut policy for Afghanistan.

2. The best method is training Afghan National Army within the next two or three years which can take care of taliban. Gradually USA and other countries can withdraw from the scene.

3. Pakistan should not get involved in training Afghan National Army as they may infiltrate their own people into Afghan army.

4 He says India is doing a wonderful job on education, health and other social welfare measures. It has earned the good will of local Afghan people. Other nations should also follow that and get it implemented through Indian people employed in such mission in Afghanistan

Let better sense prevails on all the nations.

All the best
 
GP,is a tremendous civil servant and an Indian patriot.From his point of view and his expertise,he has written the article.An American need not openly disclose his policy to the world,as it would be counter-productive,given the nature of the war.Nor would an Indian disclose the policy during war time,should his country be in war.Sage Chanakyas treatise is such a wonderful document during war time,how a ruler should act,to acheive his objective.Despite beng an ancient document,the rules of engagement have hardly changed for humanity.

nachi naga.
 
Not enough civilians are killed

Hi folks,

While I believe US military must just leave Afghanistan, I was very heartened by the new approach of taking civilian casualties seriously. Unlike the Fallujah offensive in late 2004 under Bush administration, the current Marjah offensive in Afghanistan, under the Obama leadership, seems to take the civilian plight into account. No counterinsurgency operation can succeed unless the civilians are with you.

Yet, I just read a particularly abominable opinion column in NY Time that criticizes the cautious approach we have seen so far, and instead calls for more aggressive tactics where civilian suffering is argued as a necessary price to pay. I am reminded of Raju's arguments that the Afghan civilians paying a price for the terrorism of middle-class Arab radicals is just fine.

I am normally a cheerful person, but I get down when I see NY times, the self proclaimed newspaper of record, gives space for such disgusting views.

Thank you....
 
Voice of RAWA

DPNJ, (Dear Prof. Nara Ji)

RAWA strongly believes that there should be no expectation of either the US or any other country to present us with democracy, peace and prosperity. Our freedom is only achievable at the hands of our people. It is the duty of all the intellectuals, all the democratic forces and progressive and independence-seeking people to rise in a constant and decisive struggle for independence and democracy by taking the support of our wounded people as the independent force, against the presence of the US and its allies and the domination of Jehadi and Taliban criminals. Combating against the armed and alien forces in the country without being loud-mouthed against the Talibi and Jehadi enemies would mean welcoming the misfortunes of fascism and religious mafia. Also, struggling against this enemy without fighting the military presence of the US, its allies and its puppet government would mean falling before foreign agents. The path of the freedom-fighters of our country without doubt, will be very complex, difficult and bloody; but if our demand is to be freed from the chains of the slavery of foreigners and their Talib and Jehadi lackeys, we should not fear trial or death to become triumphant.

Pls hv a look at this this

Regards
 
It's in the interest of NATO and its allies,to have these wars.Why?Because they want somethng from that region.When negotiations failed amicably,the bogey to create war was stagemanaged .This whole wars is a show,as to who wields power in the world and will police the world as long as they can.Who is there to oppose.?The strategy now is to bleed the NATO and its allied forces,just like how Pakistans modus operandi is to bleed India thru its non-state jihadi networks,and claim,we now have a common enemy.Thats a lot cock and bull story.Ordinary civilians are the innocent victim as collateral damage.The curse of god,will be immense for future generations to face.Sad,as i do not know gods way with his children.

nachi naga.
 
DPNJ, (Dear Prof. Nara Ji)

Hello PVR,

If there is one moral imperative for the presence of the US and foreign troops in Afghansitan, it is the plight of the Afgan women. I have seen documentaries, feature length films, interviews of RAWA members like Zoya, a pseudonym of a RAWA activist the image of whose face was obscured to protect her identity for obvious reasons. Terrible as their plight may be, the courage of these women is an untold story. The corporate media

I urge Raju and others who wish Afghanistan to pay the price for the terrorism of others to visit this site and watch some of the interviews given by these women.

These women want US troops to leave, right away. They say there are other methods for US to help Afghanistan.

Cheers!
 
DPNJ,

RAWA was originally founded in 1977 as an Afghan feminist group focused on women's rights, but its mandate broadened when fundamentalists rose to power. Determined to expose the frightening abuses of the Taliban, women in the group began to hide video cameras under their burqa and document the executions and public floggings which take place every day under the Taliban. They also smuggle female journalists like Shaila Shah into the country, in hopes of bringing attention to their cause. In defiance of the Taliban's law forbidding education for women, RAWA also runs clandestine home-based schools for girls; for women, who are forbidden to work, RAWA teaches handicrafts and sells them online. In the refugee camps in Pakistan, RAWA also provides medical assistance, housing and education for impoverished and terrified fugitives of Taliban rule.


If the job of finishing Taliban is not done, it may prove to be a very costly mistake by US in the years to come.

The Taliban initially enjoyed enormous goodwill from Afghans weary of the corruption, brutality, and the incessant fighting of Mujahideen warlords. Two contrasting narratives explain the beginnings of the Taliban.[25] One is that the rape and murder of boys and girls from a family traveling to Kandahar or a similar outrage by Mujahideen bandits sparked Mullah Omar and his students to vow to rid Afghanistan of these criminals.[26][27] The other is that the Pakistan-based truck shipping mafia known as the "Afghanistan Transit Trade" and their allies in the Pakistan government, trained, armed, and financed the Taliban to clear the southern road across Afghanistan to the Central Asian Republics of extortionate bandit gangs.[28]
Although there is no evidence that the CIA directly supported the Taliban or Al-Qaeda, some basis for military support of the Taliban was provided when, in the early 1980s, the CIA and the ISI (Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence agency) provided arms to Afghans resisting the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, and the ISI assisted the process of gathering radical Muslims from around the world to fight against the Soviets.[29] Osama Bin Laden was one of the key players in organizing training camps for the foreign Muslim volunteers. The U.S. poured funds and arms into Afghanistan, and "by 1987, 65,000 tons of U.S.-made weapons and ammunition a year were entering the war."[30] FBI translator Sibel Edmonds, who has been fired from the agency for disclosing sensitive information, has claimed the United States was on intimate terms with Taliban and Al-Qaeda, using them to further certain goals in Central Asia.[citation needed] The Taliban were based in the Helmand, Kandahar, and Uruzgan region which is overwhelmingly Pashtun territory and predominantly Durranis.[31] The New York Times reported that the Reagan administration delivered several hundred Stingers to Afghan resistance groups, including the Taliban.[32]
Link

US-Pak-Taliban - Its a complex relationship.

Regards

 
If President Obama wants to have another 4 year term,then the troops have to be brought back.The American people voted him based on such campaign assurances.Now that he is the occupant of the position,he has far more information,which prohibhits his retreat of troops immediately.So,its a tricky dance,and truthfully projected,the world will understand this outstanding leader of our times.

nachi naga.
 
It is the responsibility of USA & other western countries to train and develop Afghan National Army. If they sincerely attempt, it can be done in the next three or four years.

Parallely they have to start welfare measures like schools, hospitals etc and win the hearts of Afghan people.

If they with-draw subsequently, it will serve the purpose. Otherwise there is no solution to Afghanistan

All the best
 
krs,

In the [COLOR=#5ea0c3 !important][COLOR=#5ea0c3 !important]US [COLOR=#5ea0c3 !important]Congress[/COLOR][/COLOR][/COLOR] building, there stands the national seal, a bald eagle, with one foot clutching an olive branch and the other a bunch of arrows. This country could have annexed the countries it conquered, but unlike Russia and others, it never annexed them, contrary to the wishes of the locals. Germany, Japan, [COLOR=#5ea0c3 !important][COLOR=#5ea0c3 !important]South [COLOR=#5ea0c3 !important]Korea[/COLOR][/COLOR][/COLOR] are but a few examples.

USA operates on leverage business.Recent example being,Gen.Musharaff of Pakistan,who did 360 degree about turn,when Colin Powell gave a stiff warning to him.Americans won without firing a single bullet on Pakistan then.That sir,is leverage using whatever sanctions to get things done.Today Indians are again toeing the line of USA to talk with Pakistan,so that Indias economic ambitions get fulfilled for its citizens.Americans walk the talk unlike many other nationalities,its just that while walking,sometimes in stupor do jaywalking also.

nachi naga.
 
Taliban

Dear TBS ji,
hi folks,
another taliban story....

Taliban beheads two Sikhs in Pakistan


regards
tbs
Taliban is (said to be)born to remove the evils in their society, which is acting themselves as bandits and murderers not for the noble sake. They are proving to be animals which do not deserve any mercy (including- Kazaab). Since they have refused to talk with AF govt due to the presence of Nato, now, US will really be in a dilemma. US already earned bad press, even if they withdraw now, it is not going to change. I hope, they finish Taliban before they go back.

Our own Moslim population keeps mum even against such incidents.

Cheers
 
U
krs,



USA operates on leverage business.Recent example being,Gen.Musharaff of Pakistan,who did 360 degree about turn,when Colin Powell gave a stiff warning to him.Americans won without firing a single bullet on Pakistan then.That sir,is leverage using whatever sanctions to get things done.Today Indians are again toeing the line of USA to talk with Pakistan,so that Indias economic ambitions get fulfilled for its citizens.Americans walk the talk unlike many other nationalities,its just that while walking,sometimes in stupor do jaywalking also.

nachi naga.

USA cannot dictate Indian foreign policy.

India is talking to Palkistan simply to avoid a conflict. Everybody knows that nothing is going to come out of the talks.

USA wants to put India against China which India will never agree inspite of some border disputes.

USA got the nuclear supplier group waiver for India. Only Russia and France are capitalising on the deal and USA has so far not benefited from the deal.

Each country has its own agenda. USA is fast losing its power to enforce agenda on other countries. Definitely India cannot be bullied by any other power on earth.

All the best
 
re

U

USA cannot dictate Indian foreign policy.

India is talking to Palkistan simply to avoid a conflict. Everybody knows that nothing is going to come out of the talks.

Unless India taks with Pakistan,Afghanisan imbroglio will continue deeper.Behind the scenes,brokering by USA is being done,with common enemy for USA,Af-Pak,India.

USA wants to put India against China which India will never agree inspite of some border disputes.

It's unfortunate,that China & USA,have colluded,as is evident.To cow china,taiwan card is used as well dalai lama card.China uses its prerogative to sell T-Bills thereby sending the dollar into a tizzy.India is not the same as it was in 1965,so china cannot browbeat Indians to a corner.61 years later after independance,border issues is still pending with neighbours,speaks volumes of Indians diplomacy or lack of it.The Indian is still in dire need of infrastructral changes.

USA got the nuclear supplier group waiver for India. Only Russia and France are capitalising on the deal and USA has so far not benefited from the deal.

Each country has its own agenda. USA is fast losing its power to enforce agenda on other countries. Definitely India cannot be bullied by any other power on earth.

All the best

The big 5 in UN rule the world by proxy.They have perfect understanding amongst themselves,try to wool gather over the eyes of people at large in the world.After 1971 USA,has been more of friend than an enemy,even though we harbor suspicion about USA motives,given the aid & arms to Pakistan,which is quiet natural.USA will sell arms to anybody,because its in its self-interest for its economy to thrive.In fact,powerful forces work against India-Pakistan rapproachment,as then super-powers will have to look for a new client to sell arms.

nachi naga.
 
Unless India taks with Pakistan,Afghanisan imbroglio will continue deeper.Behind the scenes,brokering by USA is being done,with common enemy for USA,Af-Pak,India.



It's unfortunate,that China & USA,have colluded,as is evident.To cow china,taiwan card is used as well dalai lama card.China uses its prerogative to sell T-Bills thereby sending the dollar into a tizzy.India is not the same as it was in 1965,so china cannot browbeat Indians to a corner.61 years later after independance,border issues is still pending with neighbours,speaks volumes of Indians diplomacy or lack of it.The Indian is still in dire need of infrastructral changes.



The big 5 in UN rule the world by proxy.They have perfect understanding amongst themselves,try to wool gather over the eyes of people at large in the world.After 1971 USA,has been more of friend than an enemy,even though we harbor suspicion about USA motives,given the aid & arms to Pakistan,which is quiet natural.USA will sell arms to anybody,because its in its self-interest for its economy to thrive.In fact,powerful forces work against India-Pakistan rapproachment,as then super-powers will have to look for a new client to sell arms.

nachi naga.

India has its own interest in Afghan. It is playing its cards safely by getting involved only with welfare measures in Afghan leaving the military action against Taliban to USA & others.

China is struck with USA treasury bills. They don't know what to do with the USA dollar. If they sell in the open market, dollar will crash resulting in loss to China. If they don't sell, unnecessarily they are propping the dollar. It is like catching a tiger's tale. China may stop accumulating US treasury bills in the future and the same will see the decline of dollar.


It is good that India doesn't have excess foreign exchange reserves unlike China. India has started accumulating Gold and stopped believing global currencies.

Chinese are uneasy with Dalai Lama being patronised by India. Arunachal Pradesh is another issue where India has won over the people by democratic process. Except these two issues, China doesn't have much of problem. I think the issue will prolong and there is no solution at sight.

American defence equipment manufacturers have vested interest in creating conflicts elsewhere but India will not get trapped by their evil design. They are totally disappointed by India's reaction to Mumbai blasts.

All the best
 
An interesting article from Global consulting firm, Mckinsey about German health care system is available in the following website.

https://www.mckinseyquarterly.com/H...are_costs_An_interview_with_Franz_Knieps_2534

Unlike USA, Germany controls health care costs inspite of tremendous pressures and the system works much better as compared to USA.

If there is any problem in opening the website, you can register to Mckinsey by giving email and it is a free to read article.

All the best
 
rvr,

Chinese are uneasy with Dalai Lama being patronised by India. Arunachal Pradesh is another issue where India has won over the people by democratic process. Except these two issues, China doesn't have much of problem. I think the issue will prolong and there is no solution at sight.

I am now beginning to suspect Dalai Lama,is torn between his love of Buddhism and patriotism of China.If China gives him the love & respect of autonomy of Tibet,Dalai Lama will pack his bags and be part of China.The independent Tibet is a huge territory,that communist China will never ever become autonomous rule established.So,Dalai Lamas next reincarnation will do whatever is neccessary,as the present Dalai Lama has lost his powers of spirituality,imo.

Arunachala Pradesh is part and parcel of India.But China has built military offensive positions to capture AP,and Indians are sitting ducks there.Surprise attack is going to take place,and we will be caught with our pants down.

nachi naga.
 
re

“Brother Nidal is the ideal role-model for every repentant Muslim in the armies of the unbelievers and apostate regimes. You shouldn’t make the mistake of thinking that military bases are the only high-value targets in America and the West. On the contrary, there are countless other strategic places, institutions and installations which, by striking, the Muslim can do major damage. Nidal Hasan is a pioneer, a trailblazer and a role-model who has opened a door, lit a path and shown the way forward for every Muslim who finds himself among the unbelievers. I am calling on every honest and vigilant Muslim in the countries of the Zionist-Crusader alliance in general and America, Britain and Israel in particular to prepare to play his due role in responding to and repelling the aggression of the enemies of Islam.”

Al-Qaida: US Muslims should attack America like Ft. Hood shooter Right Pundits

Destabilisation of USA by Islam.

nachi naga.
 
re

The "theory of everything" is one of the most cherished dreams of science. If it is ever discovered, it will describe the workings of the universe at the most fundamental level and thus encompass our entire understanding of nature. It would also answer such enduring puzzles as what dark matter is, the reason time flows in only one direction and how gravity works. Small wonder that Stephen Hawking famously said that such a theory would be "the ultimate triumph of human reason – for then we should know the mind of God".

But theologians needn't lose too much sleep just yet. Despite decades of effort, progress has been slow. Rather than one or two rival theories whose merits can be judged against the evidence, there is a profusion of candidates and precious few clues as to which (if any) might turn out to be correct.

Here's a brief guide to some of the front runners.

1.String theory
2.Loop quantum gravity
3.CDT
4.Quantum Einstein gravity
5.Quantum graphity
6.Internal relativity
7.E8

==================================

Read more at http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn18612-knowing-the-mind-of-god-seven-theories-of-everything.html?page=1

nachi naga
 
Hi folks,

What separates the terrorists and the rest of us is rule of law. Reasonable people use rule of law to settle differences, terrorists don't. Target being a terrorist does not release one from the rule of law. Then the retaliation is at the very least unlawful. Click here for a short opinion piece from Washington Post, and interesting one.

Cheers!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest ads

Back
Top