In fact this might be quite true... For ghandhaari is from that area?Where else. Just from beyond the khyber pass.
In fact this might be quite true... For ghandhaari is from that area?Where else. Just from beyond the khyber pass.
Yes you are right sir, i did exaggerate it a bit for drama.This should have been the first point that should have been taken up for consideration. But as long as the said scripture suited the members to demonstrate their point of view, people chose to ignore its validity.
From where do you get this idea? Are there any such instances reported in scriptures?
The Bhagavad Gita (1:40-42) commented that a corrupt woman would destroy the family value, resulting in the destruction of her family.
Yes you are right sir, i did exaggerate it a bit for drama.
Manu smrithi:
9.101. Husband and Wife should remain together till death. They should not approach any other partner, nor commit adultery. This, in summary, is the Dharma or religion of all human beings. Thus those societies which justify polygamy or sex-slavery or temporary marriage are bound to suffer miseries because they neglect the core tenet of Dharma.
Adulterous relations or extra marital affairs involving a married woman attract more severe punishments than the ones involving an unmarried woman. Hinduism does not support adulterous liaisons and it is considered a moral sin. Individuals who get involved in treacherous or illegitimate relationships have to face a lot of public disrespect and societal humiliation, generally in the rustic regions, where the social order is still conventional. Particularly in case of women, the consequences of adultery are much worse and extra marital affairs involving married women are rarely overlooked or pardoned. According to Hinduism, marriage is a sacrosanct association, which is not limited to one birth and extends over several lives. It is necessary to maintain the purity of marriage and to uphold matrimonial vows. Breaking the consecrated promise and the union of marriage recognized with deities as witness is a profanity and an appalling karma. Adultery is being severely dealt with in ancient Hindu law books for ethical as well as social reasons. Adultery may lead to perplexity of castes, decrepitude of family standards and societal disarray. According to Vishnu Purana 3.11, “A man should not think incontinently of another’s wife, much less address her to that end; for such a man will be reborn in future life as a creeping insect. He who commits adultery is punished here and hereafter; for his days in this world are cut short, and when dead he falls into hell.” Adultery has never been accepted in Hinduism and even today the Indian society treats it as a wrongful deed.
Whether called adultery, infidelity, or unfaithfulness, the Hindu dharmasastras do not permit any act of sexual union outside the socially sanctioned marriage system. The life of a person in the phase of grihasthya (household life) has prescribed functions of prajaa (progeny for family), dharma (meeting religious goals), and kama (sensual and emotional pleasure). A serious breach of dharma occurs if there is any deviation like lesbianism, homosexuality, and adultery. The Bhagavad Gita (1:40-42) commented that a corrupt woman would destroy the family value, resulting in the destruction of her family. According to the Vishnu Purana, if a man commits adultery, he will be severely punished in this birth as well as the next birth (3:11). Even offering of gifts or touching of the dress and ornaments of a woman constitutes an act of adultery. According to the ancient lawgiver, Manu (100 BCE to 100 CE), severe punishment was to be imposed on men and women indulging in samgrahana (adulterous acts) (5:154; 8:371-372). The Atharva Veda was against even having sinful thoughts (6:45, 1). Manu had implored the king to free the kingdom from assault, adultery, theft, defamation, and violence so as to enjoy sovereignty and integrity (5:154; 8:386-387). Hinduism recognizes the moral issues of adultery that cause degradation of family life as well as social disorder.
http://what-when-how.com/love-in-world-religions/adultery-in-hinduism/
Adultery Laws in India
According to ancient Hindu laws, only the felonious female were punished and killed while the husbands were considered equal to god and were left off with warnings only.
http://www.advocatekhoj.com/library...dultery Divorce&STitle=Adultery laws in India
Going by the story, none of the Pandavas and Karna were were Kshatriyas. The gods did not have caste system so Karna (if he is son of SUN) can not have a caste, Pandu at best was the adopted father, so there is no lineage from a kshatriya. If Kunti was not the queen she would have been stoned to death and these children will be treated as mongrel.
Then again it is a story.
This quote is partially misleading because this is what Arjuna says (perhaps about prevailing thinking) . But it is not acknowledged by Sri Krishna in his response
utseedeyurime lokaa na kuryaam karma chedaham |
samkaryasya cha kartaa syaamupahanyaamimaah prajaaha || 24 ||
These people would be ruined if I stopped performing action. I would become the creator of confusion and destroy these beings.
Dear Vaagmi ji,
I did not want to be the first person to derail your new thread hence I am posting a question here with regards to Organizing the Community.
Firstly I strongly believe a person is Brahmin by birth only and not be Guna blah blah.
Ok I also know you advocate an understanding about Sattva being the more dominant expression in a Brahmin.Here again I fully agree.
Now my question.
So what happened? Why is there a need to even organize the community..why the need to prevent dwindling numbers...what is the reason why IC or IR marriage taking place.More TB girls are marrying Non TB guys.
So if Sattva is the dominant expression in the genetic make up of a TB how come Sattva does not seem to be expressing itself anymore by the looks of it that IC/IR marriage taking place.
What is with the Sattva gene that has turned recessive in recent times?
I do not want to blame the Yuga cos a link between Yuga and genetic code Sattva expression can not be established.
Can you share your opinion here?
Renukaji,
Rapid urbanization, globalization & the current electoral politics are the root causes for the death of the community..There are no more kings to take up the cause of Brahmins...No more agraharams...Nobody to put Dharmasastras on a holy pedestal..Now TB's are pushed to the wall & are forced to fend for themselves
Dear Vgane ji,
Your answer is from the environmental point of view.Environment does have an influence on human behavior but I am looking for a genetic based reply.
Ok for example hair color..a person who is black haired who has had all ancestors with black hair... even if everyone around him is blonde his hair is never going to turn blonde.
He would remain black haired becos he carries the genes for black hair.
Black hair is a dominant gene..it will express itself in a more evident way than any other hair color.
So likewise here..the Sattva expression is the dominant expression in a TB for example.
I am not using the word Sattva gene cos a Sattva gene has not been isolated yet but who knows in the future it might be isolated.
Now coming back to what I was saying..environmental factors alone can not really stop anything from expressing itself.
So if you say that ."There are no more kings to take up the cause of Brahmins...No more agraharams...Nobody to put Dharmasastras on a holy pedestal" that means the Sattva expression needs a saviour..a protector for its survival when other expressions like Rajas and Tamas can survive under any condition...would that mean that the Sattva expression is not conducive for survival of the fittest?
Your opinion makes it sound as if Sattva =Weakness.
Do you really view yourself as weak that you need a King to take up the cause for Brahmin or no one to put Dharmashastras in holy pedestal? What happen to individual capability of the Sattva expression?
I would not want to agree with your findings cos that would only show that environmental influences can cancel the effect of a genetic expression which would just in turn make the Sattva genetic theory null and void cos environmental factors affects entire mankind the same which means Sattva is not going to have an edge if its equally influenced.
I seek some more clarification here.
Sattva is not a weakness...Suppose we have a sattvik and we have him surrounded by 4 non sattviks in 4 directions..He is now forced to smell only non sattvik food daily..He hears only non sattvik ..The Government also promotes non sattvik and says that we will give jobs & education only to non sattviks....Even if you are a poor sattvik no one will help you as you are a sattvik !!
In such a (non) congenial environment If the sattvik is hammered on all fronts (which is happening in TN) what will happen to his family...Either they will run away from that place (Read migrate) or they will convert to non sattvik (Read IC & IR)
Hope this explains
Introspection gives more answers than blaming external factors.
Can you vouch that whatever external factors that I mentioned against TB's are not there in TN?
You yourself would be hearing about the talk about tokenization, unification of TB's only in TN & not in other parts of India except Kashmir because the the politics of hatred against B's are not present in those States.
Dear Vaagmi ji,
I did not want to be the first person to derail your new thread hence I am posting a question here with regards to Organizing the Community.
Firstly I strongly believe a person is Brahmin by birth only and not be Guna blah blah.
Ok I also know you advocate an understanding about Sattva being the more dominant expression in a Brahmin.Here again I fully agree.
Now my question.
1. So what happened? Why is there a need to even organize the community..why the need to prevent dwindling numbers...what is the reason why IC or IR marriage taking place.More TB girls are marrying Non TB guys.
2. So if Sattva is the dominant expression in the genetic make up of a TB how come Sattva does not seem to be expressing itself anymore by the looks of it that IC/IR marriage taking place.
3. What is with the Sattva gene that has turned recessive in recent times?
4. I do not want to blame the Yuga cos a link between Yuga and genetic code Sattva expression can not be established.
Can you share your opinion here?
Ram banished Sita to the forrest away from kingdom, because someone raised the Adultery flag, even though she came with flying colors from fire Test.
The TB's were brain washed to think that they are superior by the called so Dravidian-Aryan theory..We all know NOW it is just a hog wash..So this would soon end!
Created by the god Brahma as the most beautiful woman, Ahalya was married to the much older Gautama. Ahalya falls prey to Indra's trickery. Ahalya and Indra are cursed by Gautama. Ahalya is cursed to become a stone.
in valmiki ramayan he clearly states that ahalya knew it was not gautama but felt flattered that indra fancied her.
From the psychological point of view...its like an imaginary game..for example some people dress up as waitresses,nurses etc for amorous role play..so indra taking the form of gautama could have been a major reason for ahalya to find the game worthy of a response.
I think I had mentioned this before in forum..that none of them were Kshatriyas.
Pandavas were son's of Devas..therefore only half humans..they were Demi-Devas.
Kauravas were sons of Dhritarasthra who was a actually son of Veda Vyasa and a the mum of Dhrits who was a Kshatriya.
Veda Vysa was half Brahmin..half Shudra (mother was Sathyavati).
Therefore that makes Dhrits a 25% Brahmin, 25%Shudra and 50% Kshatriya.
That makes the Kauravas 12.5% Brahmin,12.5% Shudra and 75% Kshatriya.
What a mixed caste!LOL
Doctor ma'am another point to ponder. How come the male devas (who were presumably all married) had children with earth women with impunity? Nobody considered this bad behavior, adultery etc.
Now imagine the genders were reversed and some men were allowed to procreate with some goddesses. Imagine the hue and cry! Would the goddesses still be worshipped?
What explanation is there for this except for the puranas being written by conservative males in a patriarchal society?