Jayalalithaa convicted, found guilty! Sentencing at 3 p.m. today

[CHANDRU1849]

Share:

Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn WhatsApp Email Share Link

And for the murder of saivite in a vaishnava temple premises. See how saivam and vaishnavam are interrelated and connected.

I presume the murdered was not a Saivite. He was an Advaithy, a pseudo-vaishnavite.

 

[BRAHMACHARI]

If one does an action there is a result. The results may come today or sometime in future. It is only binding to the jiva, a jivenmukta can perform any action and may not get attached to the results.

The Karma theory is not a judgement system. The judgement system punishes one (if caught and convicted) for misdeeds against the constitution. There is no correlation between the two.

Karma first came into being as a concept in Hinduism, largely based on the Vedas and Upanishads. One of the first and most dramatic illustrations of Karma can be found in the great Hindu epic, the Mahabharata. The original Hindu concept of karma was later enhanced by several other movements within the religion, most notably Vedanta, Yoga, and Tantra.


Hinduism sees karma as immutable law with involuntary and voluntary acts being part of a more intricate system of cause and effect that is often not comprehensible to one bound by karma. It is the goal of the Hindu, as expressed succinctly in the Bhagavad Gita, to embrace a 'sattvic' lifestyle and thus avoid creating more karma (karma is not qualified as good or bad). By ceasing to create more karma, the jiva-atma or individual soul is able to move closer to moksha, or liberation.


To the Hindu, karma is the law of the phenomenal cosmos that is part and parcel of living within the dimensions of time and space. All actions, thoughts, vibrations of any sort, are governed by a law that demands perfect rebound. So all jiva-atmas (individual souls) must experience karma if they live and experience the phenomenal universe. To escape the cycle of life, death and rebirth, one must exhaust one's karma and realize one's true Self as the highest truth of Oneness that is Brahman (or for dvaitists (dualists) bliss with the Supreme Godhead).

prasad sir,

i thank you immensely for your impartation. though brief, your piece of wisdom has put hinduism and karma in nutshell and has enlightened me a little (en mara mandaikku ivvalavudhaan ettum, adhanaal mannithuvidungal). although the ignorant self that i am who is no intellectual, cannot digest the intellectualism that is hinduism, this little gyaan of yours has helped me to decide to remain a brahmin (seeker of TRUTH) and to not to be a hindu (hypocrite). but i beseech members of this forum to refrain from debating on my statement and from pouncing on me, in this thread. perhaps a separate thread may be opened for the purpose.

thanks a lot sir.

 

[CHANDRU1849]

Chandru Sir,

Do you mean to say,

1. had jj granted bail to acharya, as per law of karma, she also in turn would have been granted bail by karnataka hc?

2. had jj not convicted acharya, jj also would not have been convicted but acquitted, would have been deemed, declared, pronounced as not possessing assets disproportionate to income, would become innocent and not guilty of crime?

honestly sir, this ignorant soul that i am, am not able to understand the operations of karma. i have begun to doubt if there is anything called karma theory existing!!! i am no intellectual sir. please forgive me for my ignorance. but please enlighten me sir.

Sir,

I haven't touched upon the Karma theory in JJ's case. I have only pointed out the similarities in the Prosecution argument - Influential, fleeing the country.

Even JJ ignored Acharyas' case and had not convicted, JJ's case would have come up for hearing and ultimate conviction.