Who wants to bother giving you lessons? Its apparent what you know about genetics and anthropologypalindrome,
post #21 and 22:
All that you have asked for in your post #21 are already there. You have to only read up. I know what is anthropology and what is genetics and I do not have to take lessons from you on this. You have a tendency to repeatedly ask for proof for this and that(without bothering to read the references given) like your friend asking for chapter and verse of everything said here. It is as if you are too busy to look up the references provided here. Please note I am as busy as you. You are well known here in this forum for such antics when you were in your earlier avatar HH. I thought you would have matured. However it appears that it has not happened. I am not going to continue the conversation with you any more. You can derive any conclusion from this and vent your spleen here. I won't reply. I have no time for such mediocrity.
So just list your dumb claims and let me send them to Robert Boyd. If he bothers to read it or reply, I shall paste the response here. If he does not, it is still okay. Atleast he will have a good laugh. Or maybe he will list them on his page here (and maybe even invite you to work with him -- bcoz you are so innovative enough to pass off your opinions as Boyd's work) - http://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/anthro/faculty/boyd/
The point is do you have the gall to list all the points which you wish to attribute to Robert Boyd. You have not given any references so far except claiming Robert Boyd's work proves your baseless claims. Don't beat around the bush with your silly excuses.
Last edited: