....Thats why I think Desi parents (pehaps not the current lot? dunno) are amazing. They sacrifice their love and opportunity to find new love for their children, by staying together however loveless, argumentative, war-zone their marriage is.
Dear Amala, divorce is serious business, not many in the west take it lightly, there may be a few Britney Spears, but you will find such extremes even in the East. I agree that it is less common in the west for people to stay in a loveless marriage for the sake of the kids, but whether it is rare, I am not sure.
BTW, I was responding to the question which is better specially with kids involved (a) Indian culture: Divorce bad, marriage at any cost good, or (b) Western culture: Loveless marriage bad, divorce better. Perhaps I should have said it depends, as I feel the cost benefit is unique for each circumstance.
A single-mom family, or a loving family with step-father is a better environment for the kids than one in which there is no communication or love. But, I agree, I can't say for sure that it is always better to end a loveless marriage without any concern for the kids.
One more point, in the west people have this choice, to consider the pros and cons critically. However, in the east, for the most part, this is not an option at all. In a practical sense most women don't have the option of divorce.
Regarding a point made by Mr. Nara about relationships vs people in the relationships. I was just thinking, if I had a different person as a son, would I not love him equally?
Yes biswa, you would, but then you would still be loving the person, not the relationship. I think if we elevate the "relationship" to a higher level of importance, above the person, then there is a danger of getting stuck with externally defined norms and expectations of the given relationship which could very easily descend into disappointments, recrimination, guilt etc. I may not be very articulate with what I am trying to convey, but I think there is an important difference.
Cheers!