Vaagmi
0
Dear Shri Vaagmi,
I have given my views and am willing to back it up with evidence.
You have to show that My arguments are logically invalid
or
The solution will not work in the way solutions of science work
Dear Sri Sravna,
My intention is not to pour cold water on your enthusiasm.
Science has its own method of testing before accepting a finding.
Now let us take the situation which you are trying to deal with.
Here is a man X who is suffering from severe hepatitis. Science has determined the condition as one which is about an afflicted liver. Because it is well proved we need not question that. So we can take that the liver of Mr.X is affected. Science has built up over a long period an archive on this disease. The disease can be because of various reasons and these have been identified and documented well. For simplicity let us accept that Mr. X suffers from a hepatitis which is due to what is popularly known as jaundice infection.
Now if we observe all this the following points become clear to us:
Mr.X's condition is not unique as there had been several cases of hepatitis. We have well established scientific methods to determine the condition by testing the blood and urine. And there are medicines which help mr.X's liver recover quickly. It is also a fact that god has built in excess capacity in liver and so even with half a liver functioning effectively Mr. X can lead a normal life -- that is if half the liver dies and gets atrophied.
Here medical science records the initial condition of the patient with his out put by analysing it and records it.
Science determines on the medicine to be given because it is recorded as to how a chemical contained in the medicine works on the human system and on the germs etc., and importantly what are the side effects of the chemical on the body's other subsystems. To manage any ill effect on such subsystems other chemicals are added and the whole thing becomes a course of treatment. The treatment involves determining the quantity of chemicals to be given in and it is determined precisely as dosage on the basis of several parameters including the body weight of the patient.
And the most important aspect of scientific management is that the results are universally reproducible independently. Mr X and Mr. Y and any number of patients can be treated this way with similar results.
Now coming to your treatment:
Let us take the same X again.
For determining the disease, causative factors and prognosis let us accept the existing medical science's records as only the method of treatment only varies.
Now you are administering the patient energy through some method to cure him. This is your method of treatment.
Do you have info on the energy that you are going to apply? what is the unit of measurement of that energy?
Do you intend to deliver your curing energing energy depending on the severity of the disease and if so what are the parameter you are going to use to determine the severity and the required dose of energy? Medical science has methods for this but if you have your own methods let us know.
Your curing energy -- how does it work on the other subsystems in the body? Do you have info independently verified by peers? Has your energy method independently tried by other laboratories and if so what is the peer opinion?
What if your curing energy is administered in excess of need? What will be the effect?
(to be continued)
Last edited: