Here are some articles on how muslims are protesting the waqf bill and RTE Act:
1)
Right to Education Act against Muslim interests: AIMPLB - The Times of India
2)
Muslim panel to protest July 24 against Waqf bill, RTE | ummid.com
In those days, there were seperate "religions" (seperate belief systems that did not see eye to eye). The Smrithis mention diverse groups some of which it names as Vratyas or outsiders.
As the constiution of those times, the Smrithis decided who cud own wealth, who cud not. Those who did not follow smrithi edicts were punishable (as punishments for various crimes were also mentioned).
Today our constitution, our laws are our smrithis. And our judiciary the law-givers. No longer is the judiciary a "caste".
Our judiciary cud have set a precedent for being an exemplery one. But it was very stupid of the indian judiciary to devise laws, by following some of the smrithi edicts [one ex is inheritace..thankfully women have protested and ensured that all legal heirs (both daughters and sons, and not just sons alone) have the right to property].
To the aam aadmi, the indian judiciary needs to improve. Its laws are archaic, and out of touch with present-day social requirements. Governments are corrupt because the law (judiciary) is a joke. And the arm of the law (police) is a government (read politician's) servant.
If only our politicians were not corrupt, then i feel people wud have gladly accepted government ownership.
To prevent corruptive influcences of the government, a trust is a good idea, in which the travancore royals get to be equal decision-makers as government authorities to decide where the expenditure will go.
However, there must some ways in which ownership of ancient treasure must be binding and ownership is solely that of a government body (a board under a ministry). Similarly the government shd be the sole owner of all religious institutions, irrespective of whether they are churches, gurudwaras, waqf properties or hindu properties.
Now muslims are protesting the waqf bill because they do not want revenue earned from muslim religious institutions to be utilized for hindus or for the public good.
Hindus protest revenues generated from temples being used for non-hindu activities.
All these problems (ownership of ancient wealth, ownership of religious institutions and its revenues, even river-water sharing) exists because of weak laws. Because laws were not drafted properly at the time of independence.
For a true democracy to exist, all this sectarian and religious-division must end. The government must be the defacto owner of all religious institutions. Money from gurudwaras, waqf properties (which incidentally are very wealthy), money from Chruch proeprties (very wealthy again), money from temples must go to the government treasury to be utilized for public projects.
Similarly the government must own or be a part-owner of all madrassas (there is no room for protest of the RTE Act), vedic schools, and biblical colleges. Or atleast all religious-teaching institutions must come under some common laws.
But first corruption has to be rooted out. The Aam Aadmi wud like to see Anna Hazare's Lokpal Bill passed, The PM must also be investigatable for corruption and should be sent to jail if found guilty. So also Judges, Lawyers and Policemen.
Unless this is done first, nobody will like decisions, regarding ownership of religious properties and treasures, left to the hands of politicians.