hi
many brahmin familes had 13 or 14 children some decades ago...it was hard life....many families suffered dur to lot of children....
in a village agraharam.....olden days NO TV/INTERNET....so ONLY this was the entertainment....with a big joint family many
kids lived together.....even without much privacy in villages/agraharam...many had more than 10 children...BUT NOW...
IN AN APARTMENT ...LOT OF PRIVACY...STILL ONE OR TWO KIDS....
Sri tbs, I beg to differ. Please allow me to be candid in my response and it is not directed against you!
It is fashionable in affluent societies to think that the population growth in places like India and Africa for example is because people there have/had no other 'entertainment'. This idea seems to have sufficient plausibility for many to accept as fact.
However it is not borne out by facts. Population rise is inversely correlated to child mortality rates. When there is fear of survival of children born or that of the life of a mother, population explosion has been a very natural reaction. That is why the action plan by agencies involved in controlling population growth aim at decreasing the number of children that die as infants. This is counter-intuitive. There are many research articles about this subject. See the following for one example.
http://www.unicef.org/about/history/files/sourcebook_children_1990s_part2.pdf
During the time frame of living of our ancestors, survival of both child and mother was a big deal during every pregnancy. At least the fear existed always. That is why a pregnant woman's desires are always attempted to be fulfilled. The number of children in every family also tended to be high.
Today with progress in how pregnancy is cared for in relatively affluent societies, the child birth rates have fallen dramatically.
The second reason is that in our family and I suspect in most TB families, children born are always equated to wealth and blessings of Goddess Lakshmi. This attitude does not seem to exist anymore.
India is poised for being a super power because of its young population. The Germans accepted a large number of Syrian refugees not because of greatness of heart but to lower their average age needed to deal with the future. The German society have not produced sufficient youngsters.
It is only in the modern culture of leisure which promotes perverted activities and movies as entertainment we have wrong views of culture of yester years.
When people have to work hard with natural systems for a living the character ethics tended to be very high. Today, people work with artificial systems and the character strengths of most societies has fallen.
I think our ancestors led a simpler life and did not seek entertainment per se like the way people do today. They also did not produce babies for entertainment.