CLN
0
We had fulfledged systems like Shilpa Shaasthra, Naatya Shaasthra, Sangeetha Shaasthra, Vaana Shasthra, Yoga Shashaasthra, Vaasthu Shaasthra and even Yudhdha Shasthra which were based on science, logic and reason, which was not available in the western religions.
In Sanaathana Dharma, though there were six school of knowledge viz. Artha, Vyaakarana, Nyaaya, Vaisheshika, Poorvameemaamsa, and Uththarameemaamsa, and six sects viz. Shaiva, Vaishnava, Shaaktha, Ganapathya, Kaumara, and Kaalaamukha and there were many heated discussions by the men belonging to each school to justify their school of thought, there was not war or Killing.
Dear Mr. Subramaniam,
I do not see how you list various shastras and schools of knowledge of this ancient land to be part of sanaatana dharma or any 'dharma' for that matter. Only those 'sects' which you have cited can come under the classification of any religious school of thought, which of course, true to the very nature of religions, gave raise to 'heated discussions', just as you yourself have mentioned. I have pointed out in my post #96 why such things tend to happen in religion-related issues only. If these 'heated discussions' did not lead to wars and killings, it was only because the kings in our country did not normally declare any of those sects as the 'state religion' and wage wars with other kings on that count. Even so, when a king embraced any particular sect / religion, he did persecute the followers of a rival sect / religion. A case in point is that of Mahendra Varma Pallavan, who, while he adopted Jainism, persecuted Thirunaavukkarasar after he returned to Saivism to no end, until he, the king himself, was converted to Saivism by the Tamil saint. There have been reports of Jainist and Buddhist monks put to torture and death in Madurai, in the eighth century, if I am not mistaken - by whom do you think? Even if killings did not take place always, indifference, denial of recognition and outright persecution have happened time and again even in this very land of Sanaatana Dharma, when a minority sect tried to practise their faith in the kingdoms of a majority sect of a different nature. The constant tug-of-war between 'Veera Saivas' and 'Veera Vaishnavas' made life miserable for both.
So, once again, I emphasize that these things, happen in the name of religion, because of the very nature of religion - let it be any religion for that matter - is based only on 'Faith', not on 'Reason'. 'Reason' can acknowledge and tolerate, though not accept, a different point of view, whereas 'Religion' is 'intolerant' of any thing different. 'Faith' can flourish and survive only on 'unquestioning' acceptance and there lies the problem.
Last edited: