Ref. Sangom in post #150:
Time has not stood still for India either. India today is not what it was 40 years back.Like every one else we too have moved forward. India is not a banana republic who can be pushed around. Nuclear deterrence has its own dynamics. India is matured enough to handle its relations with its difficult neighbors.
There is no misplaced patriotism here. It is being aware of one's own strength, one's adversary's strength and the circumstances. In Kashmir and in AP it is a stand off. Sporadic probings by both sides is making news headlines. A routine patrol confronting another is quite different from a skirmish and a skirmish is quite different from an incident and an incident is different from a full fledged war. After the 1965 disaster, Chinese were given a bloody nose in Cho La and that was the only one serious incident ever to happen till date.
Doubting Thomases will always doubt.
A war is always a last resort. It is always avoided till the last moment. But if it has to be a war, soldiers do not go to the front wearing kid gloves.
One should not forget that 40 years have passed since the birth of Bangladesh; USSR is only a frail shadow of the superpower it was then, China is a real superpower and Pakistan has the A-bomb most probably. There is no superpower today to whom the Indian PM can send emissaries and sign a friendship treaty with that super power, with the key clause of the treaty being "both the contracting parties will consider an attack on any one of them as an attack on themselves and take appropriate action inconsultation with each other."
Time has not stood still for India either. India today is not what it was 40 years back.Like every one else we too have moved forward. India is not a banana republic who can be pushed around. Nuclear deterrence has its own dynamics. India is matured enough to handle its relations with its difficult neighbors.
The Indian army we may boast of, out of a misplaced sense of patriotism, but it is not able to stand up to China in Kashmir or Arunachal Pradesh;
There is no misplaced patriotism here. It is being aware of one's own strength, one's adversary's strength and the circumstances. In Kashmir and in AP it is a stand off. Sporadic probings by both sides is making news headlines. A routine patrol confronting another is quite different from a skirmish and a skirmish is quite different from an incident and an incident is different from a full fledged war. After the 1965 disaster, Chinese were given a bloody nose in Cho La and that was the only one serious incident ever to happen till date.
That should be "certainly we will not like to be, will not like to imagine ourselves be suckers, whatever the reality may be". After all did not VeeraPaandiya Kattabomman declare "naam jayittukkoNTE irukkiROm" even moments before his fort was overrun? That is our heritage!
Doubting Thomases will always doubt.
Of course there is no wishful thinking at all in the past events recounted. But when one says, "if Chinese or Americans ever thought of doing any harm to India, they will certainly get a bloody nose." is mere wishful thinking. Let the Chinese or Americans not get any such idea. Let us pray God for that!
A war is always a last resort. It is always avoided till the last moment. But if it has to be a war, soldiers do not go to the front wearing kid gloves.