• This forum contains old posts that have been closed. New threads and replies may not be made here. Please navigate to the relevant forum to create a new thread or post a reply.
  • Welcome to Tamil Brahmins forums.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our Free Brahmin Community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

God Exists

Status
Not open for further replies.
I came across this recently and thought its befitting this thread.

Atheism | India Religion | Non-believers
Dear Amala, nice article, thanks for posting the link. I like the last quote in the article,

"Our objective is not to tell others not to believe in God," said 67-year-old Rajesh Kher, who's stuck to his convictions for four decades. "Our goal is to get people to think."

To me, the free thinker status is the most natural one, the state into which we all are born.

Cheers!
 
I just now came across this website.
What is recorded here seems horrific.
History of Jihad against the Hindus of India, Pakistan and Bangladesh (638 - Ongoing)
The terror of fanaticism does not escape my eyes. Legend goes that my ancestors left Nasik when fanatic invaders arrived there. Even today I have heard Nasik has a high population of a particular religion. Why would somebody need to run away from a place. That is immaterial. Shiv was very concerned about atheists bringing in immorality but the stories of immorality among fanatics exceeds all limits of imagination. Though this website documents about one religion it is easy to argue that the presence of religion is bound to give birth to such fanatics. Even recently in Godhra I heard hindu fanatics chopped killed pregnant women. Ramanuja had to escape from the Chola land. There are many other stories of fanaticism even in India,
What a shame! Why is the fear of god not bringing in morality among these people.


I thought I will quote this point pertinent to us from this site
is site is against all forms of fanaticism – religious and non-religious. But the emotional appeal of non-religious fanaticism like Nazism, Fascism or Communism is not as pervasive as that of fanaticism based on religion. When fanaticism and religion are mixed, we have a very potent and dangerous brew that can sustain itself for centuries unlike non-religious fanaticisms like Nazism and Communism which die out when the ringleaders are defeated. This is so, since religion is based on the psychological weakness of all humans, when we humans try to comprehend the unknown (universe). This understanding is (and perhaps will always remain) incomplete.
Religion tries to complete this incompleteness by fantasizing that the unknown is a god and that this god is the creator of all things that happen in this world and the universe. This idea that there is a god, which is assumed to be the unknown power in the universe makes the human mind paranoid because of our fear of the unknown. And this paranoia drives humans to do anything to propitiate this unknown power that is assumed to exist. This is what transforms this weakness of our human mind into a sickness. It is this sickness of the mind that drives humans to undertake wild acts like suicide bombings, fight holy wars, forced conversion, slaughter of humans who give a different name to this assumed power called god, etc, under the delusion of trying to please the unknown power that is assumed to be behind all existence.
 
I thought I will quote this point pertinent to us from this site

this site is against all forms of fanaticism – religious and non-religious. But the emotional appeal of non-religious fanaticism like Nazism, Fascism or Communism is not as pervasive as that of fanaticism based on religion. When fanaticism and religion are mixed, we have a very potent and dangerous brew

Dear Subbudu sir, there is another important difference, the religious fanaticism kills in the name their god, for the supremacy of their religion. However, the mass killing of non-religious leaders such as Stalin and Mao were not in the name of Atheism or irreligion, the motivation was their own warped notion of social change.

Many Christians like to cite Hitler as an atheist, which is not true. He sought and got the backing of the Roman Catholic Church. His own antisemitism is one nurtured by religious bigotry and intolerance of Europe starting from Constantin's Sword, the noxious religious charge of blood libel against the Jews, and for no small measure Martin Luther's (the patron saint of Protestants) virulent antisemitism.

Got to go, more later ....

Cheers!
 
"This idea that there is a god, which is assumed to be the unknown power in the universe makes the human mind paranoid because of our fear of the unknown. And this paranoia drives humans to do anything to propitiate this unknown power that is assumed to exist. This is what transforms this weakness of our human mind into a sickness. It is this sickness of the mind that drives humans to undertake wild acts like suicide bombings, fight holy wars, forced conversion, slaughter of humans who give a different name to this assumed power called god, etc, under the delusion of trying to please the unknown power that is assumed to be behind all existence." --Post # 903 by Subbudu1


"Fear of the Unknown.. Paranoia...seeking this unknown power - the non-existent power- that's assumed to exit.... all delusions to try to please that non-existent power."

Very well said. I have been thinking of this for the past 40 years!
 
speeches like non-existant of god,makes the existant of atheist.the scriptures say,god exists within us !! maybe atheist need to have google search engine embedded within them :) to find god :) and oh boy will they have hits galore
 
suraju,your post is outstanding.i am proud of you the way you have written.maybe people have more expectations from you.plz keep posting.
 
god gives energy a continuity, what creates a pattern, is you.being aware energy is everywhere either in static state or dynamic state sivoham sivoham chidananda swaroopam
 
I am yet to come across another woman like Dr.Renuka, most accomplished in career, most well read, and most well mannered, and most impressive all rounder. She is a role-model for women. I see that her God has already blessed her with everything good and taking care of her.


Dear Dr Barani,

Thank you for your good thoughts.But you know the "well mannered" part of me...you havent read some of my previous post.
I can be BAD too!!!LOL
 
hi
some are theists....some are atheists...some are neo theists....some are anglo theists.....some middle path(moderate) theists.....

but we can call them in 3 different varieties...

1. satvic theists

2 rajasic theists

3 thamasic theists


same way..................

1 satvic atheists

2 rajasic atheists

3 thamasic atheists.....

i know some of them...but i dont want catogarise them....due to many reasons.....but we know that where we fit in these catogaries...


regards
tbs
 
Being petrified of the future of myself and my family if the gloomy future as depicted in some of the posts in this thread are to befall me, I thought it would be a good idea to see if their predictions in the past have come true. Luckily I didnt have to search very much and the thread "coming tamil nadu elections" showed some of the predictions. The election results are now known to everyone.

People can form their own judgement by following this thread: http://www.tamilbrahmins.com/politics-current-affairs/6127-coming-tamil-nadu-elections.html
 
It is our rational thinking that prevents us from doing something wicked .

sir, please take out the notion that i distorted your points. if so, please feel free to pin point it. i don't expect you to tick all the right boxes.


premise:rational thinking (excise of reasons) Or selfish mutated genes are the reasons for the human traits of being selfless/condemn killings etc, then please attempt to answer this.

most of these i have posted earlier, but once again, i have condensed them and presenting it to you

1) as an atheist who believes in the above premise, he should also be in to self respecting others view. in that way, he looses the right to condemn the wrongs of another society which itself feels what they are doing is right. thats why i asked a question from the root , with an ex, could you, as an atheist, will not get any right to condemn those gas chamber acts. where as a theist get his right to condemn it, by referring what his religion has said. please dont drag the discussion to , oh, lots of killing has happened by religion... true, but lets attempt to answer this root question.

2) you brushed out when i talked about Justice for debauchery. what system atheists/ man made legal system have, in order to give punishment to the acts of debauchery... as i said, karma gives at least an answer, where as atheism has no answer.. we both being a rationalist, in the atheism, we should not be left without answers right!

3) as per atheism , pls define the ' our purpose of life' and what next after death?

shall we take up these 3 simple points and focus on it. thank u
 
sir, please take out the notion that i distorted your points. if so, please feel free to pin point it. i don't expect you to tick all the right boxes.


premise:rational thinking (excise of reasons) Or selfish mutated genes are the reasons for the human traits of being selfless/condemn killings etc, then please attempt to answer this.

most of these i have posted earlier, but once again, i have condensed them and presenting it to you

1) as an atheist who believes in the above premise, he should also be in to self respecting others view. in that way, he looses the right to condemn the wrongs of another society which itself feels what they are doing is right. thats why i asked a question from the root , with an ex, could you, as an atheist, will not get any right to condemn those gas chamber acts. where as a theist get his right to condemn it, by referring what his religion has said. please dont drag the discussion to , oh, lots of killing has happened by religion... true, but lets attempt to answer this root question.

2) you brushed out when i talked about Justice for debauchery. what system atheists/ man made legal system have, in order to give punishment to the acts of debauchery... as i said, karma gives at least an answer, where as atheism has no answer.. we both being a rationalist, in the atheism, we should not be left without answers right!

3) as per atheism , pls define the ' our purpose of life' and what next after death?

shall we take up these 3 simple points and focus on it. thank u

I have already answered your questions in so many words. Since you want a 1,2,3 answer here they are
1. Atheist has every right to condemn what he thinks is wrong. This is because he is part of nature and is indirectly or directly or in the future likely to be affected by the actions of others. Right and wrong , logically get defined first and then only become part of religion. Even if we assume god exists, god remained a discovery and the religious rules were founded later. It is man in his vast experience as a rational person, who has discovered what is good and what is wrong for society. This has been adopted into religion. There is just no evidence of someone talking from the heavens and preaching the right and the wrong. On the contrary we have sufficient evidence of gradual development of morality with the growth of civilization. Even today the people outside civilization have a less clear idea of right and wrong. This proves that morality was a human definition based on experience and enforced later in the name of religion. But that does not make religion necessarily true. One cannot invent something in the name of religion. Apart from that so many rules in religions are there which need to be thrown out. If one goes by the assumption that these are god's commandments then it will be harmful to humans. In Hinduism we have been actually throwing out rules as and when we please, because we know it is detrimental to present well being. So we cannot actually see the harmful effects of religious morality. But these are very clear when we study certain religions which have not changed their rules even one bit.

2. Who am I to decide the right and the wrong in this regard. People as a group come together and even if they are individually selfish a commonly acceptable rule in society cannot be termed selfish. So society decides what it wants to coexist peacefully. What matters is peaceful coexistence and that can happen in a democracy and has nothing to do with religion. On the other hand religion can invert rules make wrong right, make rapists get a place in heaven, make it possible for certain women to be exploited ( as in devadasi and as in kerala systems ), can force something on society which is not good for it.

3. I am not a determined atheist. But by and large, what I can say on behalf of all rational persons is that whatevver he speaks and does , he does based on what his heart says in the light of positive consideration of evidences revealed by science in all departments including neuroscience. In general the purpose of life is to be happy and many feel that one cannot be happy unless you make your effort to make others around you happy. Because it is a naturally programmed outcome of evolution, that every human cares for people around him. Regarding death, I can say only one thing, the wise is prepared to use his life best and not worry about what happens to the rotten body which cannot think and feel since the brain is dead. He also takes joy in the fact that as a parent he is able to pass on a part of his life through his genes into the future. Thats where he lives through his genes.
 
3. I am not a determined atheist. But by and large, what I can say on behalf of all rational persons is that whatevver he speaks and does , he does based on what his heart says in the light of positive consideration of evidences revealed by science in all departments including neuroscience. In general the purpose of life is to be happy and many feel that one cannot be happy unless you make your effort to make others around you happy. Because it is a naturally programmed outcome of evolution, that every human cares for people around him. Regarding death, I can say only one thing, the wise is prepared to use his life best and not worry about what happens to the rotten body which cannot think and feel since the brain is dead. He also takes joy in the fact that as a parent he is able to pass on a part of his life through his genes into the future. Thats where he lives through his genes.

In this civilized world with law and order, how many culprits, criminals, abusers, rapist, swindlers are prosecuted and punished?

Are you 100% sure that in this civilized world with all science, technology, law and order, not a single person is left Scott Free of his crimes? The moment he commits crime? Or till his/her death?

Are you sure that all the smugglers and traffickers and distributors of opium etc..are prosecuted before spoiling 1000's of life or at least before such criminals death?

Are you sure that with the purpose of "happy to live" life in a civilized society, all the people are really living happily at their own cost? Do you think all the people are sincerely taking efforts to make others around them, happy?

Do you think & believe that, the "Selfish Gene" of evolved humans is sincerely playing a fair game with others around them?

Do you think that the motive of to be happy and satisfied, make others happy and not to harm others any way by "Selfish Gene", is upholding all such fine qualities in this civilized world of law and order?

Do you believe that the programmed outcome of human evolution towards fulfillment of care and fairness among fellow humans are achieved "Without being empowered with Spirituality / GOD"?

Do you believe that such evaluation of fine human senses are achieved due to science and technology and not ONLY and Purely due to Spirituality/GOD?

Don't you think that Science and Technology is purely to achieve sophistication of "Selfish Gene" and nothing else?

Don't you think that the evil minds of evolved humans is the only cause of riots, misusing religion deliberately, filthy political vendetta to corrupt people/society to achieve selfish motive etc..etc are all only due to "Selfish Genes" that is ignoring the true principles of Religion/spirituality/GOD?

Don't you think, "Selfish Gene", in the evolution process is getting more and more selfish and ruining all humans around and leading to all sorts of pain and agony in this world of Human survival?

A Wise Person is the one who holds on Spirituality/God and don't worry of the rotten body and dead brain at the end of his/her life. A Wise Person is the one who is into Spirituality/God and understands that "Body" is not the life. "BODY" is not the doer. "BODY" is just a tool for the "Athma" to do what it needs and what it has to do. A Wise Person is the one who is into Spirituality/God and understands that "Athma" can be selfless unlike "Selfish Gene" and get out of the clutches of "Selfish Desires", as the selfish desires of the "Selfish gene" is making him/her cruel, greedy, unfair, selfish and going crazy to the extent of cheating oneself.


A parent through "Selfish Genes" is passing on the "Selfish Motive" of his life through his genes into the future. He/She fails to pass on the Brain/Mental intellect of his refined soul (per subconscious mind), ignoring Spirituality/God.

The Lord - Richard Dawkins has perfectly explored the Selfish Motive of "Selfish Gene" as the only factor of Human Selfishness. This concept has been explored 1000's of years before by great Saints/Rishis/Yogis And subtly explored that only through the purification of "Athma" with true belief in GOD and spirituality, Humans can come out of "Selfish Motive" and all cruelty as a consequences of "Selfish Genes". Only refining the Soul with belief in GOD and being in Spirituality, a happy and peaceful human survival on personal and social level can be achieved.

GOD and Spirituality is the only force that can shower mercy upon we humans with "Selfish Genes" to live truly as Humans, simultaneously enjoying the sophisticated life of science and technology.

GOD and Spirituality is the only and only Force that can refine humans and bring about true Justice.

Science and Technology are all Ornamental fulfillment. GOD and Spirituality are true fulfillment.

A perfect accomplishment of both ornamental and true fulfillment can alone be the perfect form of human life in this world of human survival in this Yuga.




 
Yes, Yes! Those "Evil Brahmins"! Who would stay anywhere near them! The door is that way Sir, you can use google and find some nice ABB forum! Nice debating with you! Hasta La Vista!

DrBarani - I was traveling for a few days and was surprised that old elements are in full form propagating their tired old self-loathing messages again! I thought that you and Suraju06 have responded very well.

Let me share my surprise when I first tried to visit many of the threads after becoming a member here. I found people like Nara and Sangom making significant and detailed comments on threads relating to rituals, sloka recitation and offer 'expert opinion' on such details. I realized what they are sharing is what they had learnt as 'blah blah' all their life. They cannot stop going to those threads and offer 'expert opinions'

Yet their postings in my judgement lack most basic understanding of Upanishads and this conclusion is based on my interaction with them in this forum over many threads. Often their responses to questions reveal total lack of understanding and therefore I do not take their analysis seriously.

Some of the recent posts here reflect in my view an enormous anger at the world disguised towards Brahminism in my view.

The best suggestion I will have for them is to truly give up all rituals and all symbols of Brhaminism and try to understand why they feel a need to comment on retualistic details.


Let us hope that this forum provides a therapy for them to vent their anger through their self loathing posts.

Most such anger may have origins in not getting along with their father while being raised in a very strict ritualistic life style. I am not sure if this applies to the posters here but have seen this to be true of some people I know.


Regards
 

Do you think & believe that, the "Selfish Gene" of evolved humans is sincerely playing a fair game with others around them?


What does "selfish gene" do? Does it "think" and "decide" that it has to be selfish? If it is driven by some "inherent target function" then we would like to know what it is.

I see atheists freely using words like "randomness caused evolution" but none of them dare explain what that "randomness is" and how can randomness lead to only an evolved form? And why is it ok for the same people to have FAITH and BELIEF in some unexplained randomness but it is wrong if someone aims to explain it as God? I demand that Atheists start explaining this "randomness that leads to evolution". May be they can get a Nobel Prize.

Survival is a Species level concept. How the "survival factors" lead to molecular evolution has not been demonstrated. Darwinism is merely a school level explanation for species level organization. In genetics level the rules are Mendelian, not Darwinian!

I guess I will be a Theist in theory and an "evil Brahmin" in practice!
 
The best suggestion I will have for them is to truly give up all rituals and all symbols of Brhaminism and try to understand why they feel a need to comment on retualistic details.

My first recommendation for them is to legally change their Brahminical names to some alphabet soup that completely erases any trace of their religious origin.
 
Being petrified of the future of myself and my family if the gloomy future as depicted in some of the posts in this thread are to befall me, I thought it would be a good idea to see if their predictions in the past have come true. Luckily I didnt have to search very much and the thread "coming tamil nadu elections" showed some of the predictions. The election results are now known to everyone.

People can form their own judgement by following this thread: http://www.tamilbrahmins.com/politics-current-affairs/6127-coming-tamil-nadu-elections.html

Dear Shri Zebra16,

I could not locate any post regarding the future of yourself and your family, under this thread. May be my search was not very thorough. So, will you kindly give the link/s to the particular post/s you have in mind?

Regarding TN elections the guesses were just those, nothing more. I had expected DMK to come back to power even if tampered EVMs were used as a last resort, but the 2G spectrum case had made it necessary for Congress and Sonia/MMS in particular to distance themselves from Raja/Maran/Kanimozhi & Co.; perhaps they might have thought so then though now the wind seems to be blowing against!
 
What does "selfish gene" do? Does it "think" and "decide" that it has to be selfish? If it is driven by some "inherent target function" then we would like to know what it is.

I see atheists freely using words like "randomness caused evolution" but none of them dare explain what that "randomness is" and how can randomness lead to only an evolved form? And why is it ok for the same people to have FAITH and BELIEF in some unexplained randomness but it is wrong if someone aims to explain it as God? I demand that Atheists start explaining this "randomness that leads to evolution". May be they can get a Nobel Prize.

[/COLOR]Survival is a Species level concept. How the "survival factors" lead to molecular evolution has not been demonstrated. Darwinism is merely a school level explanation for species level organization. In genetics level the rules are Mendelian, not Darwinian!

I guess I will be a Theist in theory and an "evil Brahmin" in practice!

Absolutely perfect Dr.Barani!!!!!

Perfect question -
what that "randomness is" and how can randomness lead to only an evolved form?

In my post no. 916, I have attempted in detail to highlight and explain the same, as the source and cause of practicing spirituality in true sense with true belief in GOD and the subsequent mercy of GOD.

Let us see, how some atheists as reformists and scientiests could explain your brain scratching questions...

As far as I could remember, long ago some member here told that "randomness is randomness" that's why it is called "randomness". Since no specific reasons could be scientifically explored, the word "randomness" is coined. So, its nothing but the non existence of Scientific proof.

I hope this time they can do better honestly, in answering your questions...



 
Last edited:
DrBarani - I was traveling for a few days and was surprised that old elements are in full form propagating their tired old self-loathing messages again! I thought that you and Suraju06 have responded very well.

Let me share my surprise when I first tried to visit many of the threads after becoming a member here. I found people like Nara and Sangom making significant and detailed comments on threads relating to rituals, sloka recitation and offer 'expert opinion' on such details. I realized what they are sharing is what they had learnt as 'blah blah' all their life. They cannot stop going to those threads and offer 'expert opinions'

Shri tks sir,

Though your above post is addressed to Dr. Barani, since you have referred to me by my handle, I feel it will be in order for me to give my comments thereon.

I have devoted a good amount of time in studying the Hindu scriptures and have been (and still am) pondering about the reality or otherwise of the God/ Brahman concept enshrined in the Hindu psyche. At this age of 70+ I have come to the conclusion that we humans do not have any knowledge in the scientific sense of the term about the existence of a God (or myriads of Gods) or the opposite of it and that the primary need for humanity is to become better human beings first and then possibly to search for that unknown, uncomprehended entity called God. I also firmly believe that faith in God is not a necessary precondition for one to become a better human being, and also that such faith ensures that the person will be a better sample out of the lot.

Because I have had the chance to be born and brought up in a vaideeki home and did learn and know some things about the rituals, sloka recitation, etc., I do respond to posts seeking clarification in those areas.

If you and other members feel that I have no locus standi in such topics because I do not subscribe to theistic views, I will only be too contented to refrain in future from such comments. So far I was considering it as only like an elderly person trying to elucidate a simple arithmetical problem to a child by himself reciting the multiplication table for the benefit of the child, though the elderly person will have dispensed with reciting the multiplication table for the various transactions in his everyday life; hence the transgression which you point out. But you being a theist should, in all fairness, consider also the Rigvedic verse "ā no bhadrāḥ kratavo yantu viśvataḥ".

Yet their postings in my judgement lack most basic understanding of Upanishads and this conclusion is based on my interaction with them in this forum over many threads. Often their responses to questions reveal total lack of understanding and therefore I do not take their analysis seriously.
Thank you and I will be very grateful if you can recommend the books/web resources which, in your esteemed opinion, give the correct understanding. I will definitely try to learn more.

Some of the recent posts here reflect in my view an enormous anger at the world disguised towards Brahminism in my view.

The best suggestion I will have for them is to truly give up all rituals and all symbols of Brhaminism and try to understand why they feel a need to comment on retualistic details.

Let us hope that this forum provides a therapy for them to vent their anger through their self loathing posts.
It will not be correct, in my humble opinion, to make such character/attitude judgements without even knowing the other person, or even seeing him. But for the theist who can make so much of judgements about God Himself without having knwon, seen or moved with, HIM, this will be a very small job, perhaps and very much ethical too ;)
Your suggestion that the atheists (and agnostics, and all those who do not subscribe to the views of the theists in this forum) should "truly give up all rituals and all symbols of Brhaminism" is well taken. FYI I already comply with that.

As to "feeling a need to comment on retualistic details", I hope I have already clarified above; it is not "feeling a need" but trying to disseminate what we know and what someone else is looking for. What you suggest is like a non-Chennai fellow who has good knowledge of Chennai but dislikes it, being barred from clarifying if someone asks for directions in Chennai.

Most such anger may have origins in not getting along with their father while being raised in a very strict ritualistic life style. I am not sure if this applies to the posters here but have seen this to be true of some people I know.

Regards

I was not raised in very strict ritualistic surroundings though my family elders were orthodox. I too was an ordinary theistic brahmin like many of you; it is only deeper study of our scriptures and a basic inability to accept or be convinced by all that the scriptures say, which has made me an agnostic in the last ten years roughly.

I sincerely feel that people subscribe to the theist pov because they do not have adequate knowledge of the scriptures and are not bold enough to ponder over the irrationalities in religion. Basically even a theistic, and certified, Brahmin will not be prepared to believe in God beyond certain level and will use his rational intellect only. That was why I referred to a certified brahmin being willing to be tied to a rock and dropped into the sea. One member replied saying that there was one great bhakta who is reported to have said that even if he were so dealt with, his tongue will go on reciting நாதன் நாம நமச்சிவாய. But eventually the devotee was drowned as per Kamal Hassan's movie! It is the same thing with any theist when his reason tells him that it is foolish to believe that God will come to his help; hence it is reason which triumphs over religious faith ultimately.

I know of two cases of malignant liver cancer (one was a vaadhyaar, the other a rikshaw wallah of Chennai). Both got completely out of sorts when the unpleasant news somehow dawned on them that there was no cure and their days are counted. They started behaving like mad persons till they lapsed into the characteristic semi-coma stage. Faith in God did not help both even in preserving the balance of mind.
 
Last edited:
Shri tks sir,

Faith in God did not help both even in preserving the balance of mind.

Faith in God is not enough in preserving the balance of mind. Any one can addopt some faith, expecting some positive results, having "Selfish Genes"

GOD/Spirituality is not something that can be procured similar to bying something by cash, to achieve what the "Selfish Genes" want.

There are millions of people who think in the same order, that, keeping belief in GOD and being into spirituality, one can satisfy all his/her desires, the way one wants.

The case that you have expressed above of the two men, is nothing but the paradigm of "Selfish Gene", to live long for onself and for one's family.

No "Selfish Genes" can overcome these genuine Selfish motives too...That's the impact of "Selfish Genes"..

One has to get into true belief in God and true spirituality, to overcome uneasiness, wavering mind, unreasonbale selfishness, fear of death etc as a single human being.

If both the men in your story could have achieved these great tapsya, could have well managed themseves, avoiding derailment of their brain, physically and or characteristically..







 
Dear Shri Zebra16,

I could not locate any post regarding the future of yourself and your family, under this thread. May be my search was not very thorough. So, will you kindly give the link/s to the particular post/s you have in mind?

Regarding TN elections the guesses were just those, nothing more. I had expected DMK to come back to power even if tampered EVMs were used as a last resort, but the 2G spectrum case had made it necessary for Congress and Sonia/MMS in particular to distance themselves from Raja/Maran/Kanimozhi & Co.; perhaps they might have thought so then though now the wind seems to be blowing against!

Namaste Sri Sangom,

I havent posted anything regarding the future of myself or my family under this thread. I had stated that I was petrified of my future, if the gloomy predictions in some of the posts are to materialise. May be I could have been more crisp with what I intended to say.

I can understand that the guessess on TN elections were just guesses. Some relied on astro and some on newspaper/magazine reports. If the underlying info is erroenous or inadequate, the guesses could go wrong.

But some have divined or deduced and gave no basis for their beliefs or opinions and is/are doing the same in this thread. My response was to his/their posts.

Regards,

narayan
 
Dear folks,
This is what I have to say with reference to Mr. Subbudu's post#895:

Having said this , in Tamil Nadu the problem was that we Brahmins isolated ourselves from others in so many ways. Thus when the hooligans attacked us, there was no strongmen to defend the TBs. It is a problem of relationship. But in whichever pockets brahmins had good relation with NBs violence was less.
Instead of claiming to be persecuted all the time, let us also study why the people in the early part of last century did not mingle well with other communities especially lower castes. Why was it necessary for the British to come before it dawned on us that low castes need to be served too? What prevented the brahmin from going to the dalit village and help them have good knowledge ( which was accessible to the middle castes ). What prevented that? I have one and only one answer narrowmindedness in its extreme form had seeped into every fly in the agraharam.

I hail from a village in the southern part of Tamilnadu and I have lived there for a long time. I never felt this "isolation" Mr. Subbudu is talking about. If he is talking about our living in the agraharam, it was not unique to the brahmins alone. Every community in the village lived in their own clearly demarcated locations. We are talking here about the social and cultural practices of tamils in villages. If brahmins had isolated themselves in their agraharams, konars/idayars had isolated themselves in their idai chery, thevars in their marakkudi, etc. So why do Mr. Subbudu "isolate" the brahmins in the agraharam alone? Next if he is moving to the personal exclusivity maintained by brahmins(their madi, aacharam etc) all those were beliefs and formed part of their belief system relating to their overriding concern about keeping themselves "pure" to serve the God and to seek true knowledge. What was wrong in it? Even without these underlying lofty concerns the other communities in the village had their own principles of acharam madi etc in dealing with panchamans. So why isolate brahmins alone? It has become a fashion to talk about brahmins in the same breath in which we talk about caste atrocities and that is not correct. Narrowmindedness-yes. We can discuss the narrowmindedness of people not the narrowmindedness of brahmins as if they were the embodiment of all the narrowmindedness in the world.


Having said that , there were brahmins who came out with reforms. Bharathiar being one good example. There were many many others not known and famous today. There were gandhian brahmin women who married non brahmin as early as the 1950. I have met one. To a non brahmin the slow reforms in brahmin households may seem too slow and too selfish. I agree it is too slow and lot of it has to do with hypocrisy. But a lot has do with programmed orthodoxy swept deep into one's mind. This only a B can understand.

Again Mr. Subbudu is confusing the issues. The society needed reforms not brahmins. A society which was steeped in casteist madness needed the reforms. If brahmins marrying middle caste men and women is reform, I do not know what to say about this sham reform. How many panchamans have been allowed to marry higher castes? Even if they marry are they allowed to live happily ever after? Are these helpless couples not hounded out and killed in honour killings? How many brahmins have hounded out their children who married other caste men and women? Who needs reform?

This programmed orthodoxy is the reason one must understand that has prevented the elder generation from integrating and mingling well with the lower castes. If that had happened, brahmins would not have been isolated no matter how intolerant the middle castes would have been. But even the need to confront an angry middle caste may not have been there.

Brahmins are not at the mercy of these middle castes and their anger not withstanding, they are not qualified to raise their accusing fingers at brahmins. If giving up brahmin's cultural identity and value system will reward them with acceptance by the middle aggregate in the caste ladder, brahmins would better live without that acceptance and approval. In the long run this middle aggregate is going to come to grief.
 
Last edited:
Now therefore follows the entrusting: When a man thinks he is about to die, he says to his son: You are Brahman, you are the sacrifice and you are the world. The son replies: I am Brahman, I am the sacrifice, I am the world. The Sruti explains the thoughts of the father: Whatever has been studied by me (the father) is all unified in the word Brahman. Whatever sacrifices have been made by me (the father) are all unified in the word sacrifice. And whatever worlds were to be; won by me (the father)are all unified in the word world. All this is indeed this much. He (the son), being all this, will protect me from the ties of this world. Therefore they speak of a son who is well instructed as being conducive to the winning of the world; and therefore a father instructs him.


Yajur Veda, Brihadaranyaka Upanishad I, V-Manifestations of Prajapati, 17

Dear Mr. Nachi,

The self-loathing-saints here do not want anything from upanishads. If you know some thing juicy about which part of a horse is taken out and how it is taken out to give as havish in some yaga of yore you will be wellcome because there is scope for bashing....... you know whom. Upanishads should be carefully avoided so that the focus is not lost!!!

Cheers.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest ads

Back
Top