In my office there is a VP at the age of 33 years ..He was a Manager at the age of 26 years as he started going to work at the age of 20 as soon as he finished his BA...He is now more powerful that MBA's from IIM'S as he has more experience, has the requisite soft skills..Why do you feel that post graduation is the only salvation for our community...Even now many have an M.S or M.B.A by age of 24 years...2 to 3 years job is more than sufficient to start a family unless the guy is a dumb nincompoop
As far as Girls, they finish BE by the age of 21 or 22 years and they can do a 1 year PG diploma..If they do B.Sc they would have completed M.Sc.Why should they go for a job before marriage..Why are we insisting..Let us take our kids into confidence..As one of the members mentioned and shared his experience let us not push them to work!
There is something known as "tyranny of elitism" which is imposing the view of an elitist or a group of elitists on a group of beings though the view of the group is at variance with the view of the elitists. We had the example of "award Wapsi gang" in the very recent past, trying to push their view down the throats of the rest of the country.
Citing exceptions to the norms cannot be an answer to the problem. How many of your friends, acquaintances, relatives, groupies etc. became a VP at the age of 33 years? Did you yourself become a VP at 33 years of age? Is the example you are sharing an "exception to the rule" or is it the rule itself?
When we talk about a community we take the "average or mean" of the community as a reference point, not the super stars or super failures. If you take the first 10 names that crop up in your mind, how many successful VPs were there by the time they were 33?
At least I am not insisting that they should take up the job before marriage. But why are you insisting that the girls should be happy with a one year PG diploma? Why not a full fledged post graduation course and/or even doctoral thesis if they have inclination and stuff to do it?