The style reminds me of some one who was in this site before. What authority you have? Please disclose.Could you prove with evidence that churches give Rs.100 to whomsoever visits every Sunday? Have you ever visited one such church and were offered Rs.100? If your statement is true, sincere, honest reveal that church to us and we will take appropriate action. I have the authority.
I don't think that one single word "evidence" makes it alright to demand she reveal her identity. All of us have one time or another, occasionally or frequently have demanded evidence without being asked to reveal our identity, and so it is only logical to expect the same rule should apply in this case as well, unless of course suspected Christians don't enjoy the same right to privacy.கால பைரவன்;223908 said:It is one thing to ask for the name of the church. But when somebody asks you to "prove with evidence" I think it is natural to be wanting to make sure whether the member has the authority as claimed.
The style reminds me of some one who was in this site before.
Since this does not involve surreptitious tracking I don't think there is any legal issues. However, Praveen will have to spend time on this.கால பைரவன்;223914 said:....Not sure whether this is feasible. Do not know about the legalilty of this either. Just a suggestion.
As of now, it is those who are supposed to "belong" who are heaping abuses, the ones who are being challenged vigorously are not the flame throwers.
IMHO, yes I will throw in humble, simple suspicion of multiple ID is not sufficient grounds to treat them differently than the rest of us.
Who is காலபைரவன் anyhow, do I have a right to demand to know? Or the many others who go by their three letter initials? The only thing we know about all these members is that most of them are full throated supporters of Brahminism. Does that make them exempt from the scrutiny advocated for their perceived opponents? What have they done that is so outrageous that their real identity must be revealed before any further discussion can proceed? I don't get it.
Well, you strike again, LOL. KB, do you have to do this? I am now more informed about what your true opinion of me is and I am indeed saddened.கால பைரவன்;223924 said:... Of course, I have come to expect such strawman arguments from you.
If they did that, then I am on your side, they didn't have any business questioning your identity.When I first started writing in this forum, both Sangom and Kunjuppu had doubts about my identity and wanted to know my [caste] credentials.
Would you please reveal your identity so that your authority is established? For all we know "Kuvalayavalli" could very well be the person who controls churches.
Oh, this is not an unwanted probe... just felt that before asking some identity, you should perhaps disclose something about yourself, esp., if you are true, sincere, honest...
Nara said:BTW, FYI, identity and multiple ID are interrelated.
members can have different IP addresses if they are on tour to various countries or cities and post from nearest available desktops . there is nothing illegal about this. When I logged into my facebook account from singapore last week when I was visiting the country,it verified my identity saying IP address mismatch. This is just a social forum discussing brahmin issues.
கால பைரவன்;223996 said:That is like saying apple and fish are interrelated because they are both eaten as food
The fact that the forum does not mandate to reveal a member's real identity. Nara, TKS, and KB are all only forum identities and there needs to be no relation to our real identity. This framework is plenty enough for any sincere participant.
That is not the problem we are talking about. we are talking about the problem of multiple IDs arising out of the same IP!
I am feeling tired and not really inclined to explain in detail why I consider this as a problem. I hope you would excuse me for this.
Perhaps, when the problem shows up, we can have a discussion!
Nature of questions reveal the identity.. Best is to ask the person to provide answers too which I know will not be forthcoming.
The original St Thomas Christians do not pose any longer term threat to anyone. The Christians of today and religion of Islam are *exclusive* in their doctrine and theology. Therefore conversion is a required part of the theology.
Conversion aspects leads to longer term violence. If someone wants blood shed in India between Christians and Muslims let them divide up India by promoting conversion.
These religions themselves talk about peace but insist on conversion using any means which is an act of violence.
If someone wants to convert voluntarily to Buddhism, or Judaism there is no problem because those religions do not have the cancer of conversion built into their theology.
Absolutely. You are right; Kuvalayavalli can do whatever Kuvalayavalli chooses and perhaps that logic holds good even for decisions and actions that are yours and mine.....Whatever Kuvalayavalli wants to do after that is for her to choose. What is the logic for the demand that she reveal her identity?
All I wanted to verify was the sincerity, honesty and truth in Kuvalayavalli's statement that he/she indeed did have the authority to have appropriate action. Call it as the reaction of the everpresent curiosity of the cat on seeing the claims of an individual, who attests to have an authority on church administration, and striding along in a brahmin forum questioning brahminness etc (not that it is forbidden). Mine was only a reciprocal question of sincerity, honesty and truth; and absolutely not logical, as you have already pointed out. I admit.Could you prove with evidence that churches give Rs.100 to whomsoever visits every Sunday? Have you ever visited one such church and were offered Rs.100? If your statement is true, sincere, honest reveal that church to us and we will take appropriate action. I have the authority.
Not so fast. It was a public post in a public forum and you do not have the right to arbitrate matters on how things should proceed. If it were a private matter, Kuvalayavalli could very well have made a pm to biswa (after completing the number of posts required to enable a pm) to enquire on the matter.Agreed KB, let Biswa and Kuvalayavalli handle this identity part by PM if they so wish, others have no business demanding her identity as this a matter between those two. Others as spectators can expect to know how the matter was finally resolved, but they have no standing for demanding her identity be revealed.
Why converting to another religion will make you change allegiance to a different country? It does not make sense at all. If a Hindu converts to Christianity which country their allegiance will change to? I suppose you are talking only about conversions to Islam.
Let us take the example of the Koodankulam anti nuclear agitation...The Church is spearheading the agitation in the garb of an NGO...The local Hindus are not supporting this...Due to the agitation Power plant production was delayed by almost 6 months
Let us take the North East which is now fully under the control of Church...You cannot bypass the Church in Mizoram or Nagaland ..In case you do, you will be excoriated and subjected to other forms of agitations and militant terror..Why are the MSM silent about it??
Finally it boils down to "Is secularism only for Hindus"?
As of this post you have 13 in this web site, not one of them is in the Introductions thread. You don't have to introduce yourself AFAIC, but if you did post an introduction may I request you to give the link.Read my post in 'Introductions' thread.
You are mixing two different issues, opposition to the nuclear plant is a legitimate political activity. They have every right to engage in peaceful civil disobedience. If you don't like their view you don't have to join. But this has nothing to do with the questions Kuvalayavalli raised.Let us take the example of the Koodankulam anti nuclear agitation...The Church is spearheading the agitation in the garb of an NGO...The local Hindus are not supporting this...Due to the agitation Power plant production was delayed by almost 6 months
If the Church in Mizoram is illegally interfering in the government then action needs to be taken. That does no negate their right to proseletize as much as they want, as long as they are doing it in a legal way.Let us take the North East which is now fully under the control of Church...You cannot bypass the Church in Mizoram or Nagaland ..In case you do, you will be excoriated and subjected to other forms of agitations and militant terror..Why are the MSM silent about it??
So many temples are still under the control of Brahmins because of this concept of secularism. Secularism is for all of us.Finally it boils down to "Is secularism only for Hindus"?