tks
0
Sri Sangom Sir,
It would be difficult to dispute with this paragraph. But this point was hardly the thrust of your previous posts in this thread..
You were hammering away at the 5000 years of intellectual and economic deprivations of the so called 90% of the lower strata of the society by the so-called higher castes. And you had advanced the same to be the reason for introduction reservation in some fields.
Many of your contentions are on shaky foundation. But you seem to be convinced of their soundness. My post is just to give my point of view for the readers for what they are worth.
1. That 5000 years of subordination is a supreme exaggeration. The timeline of vedic civilization starts from around 1500 BC, and in Rg veda there is hardly any mention of caste, save for puruSa-sUktam which being a later interpolation, has been argued for by you.
2. The traces of caste distinctions appear in yajurveda which has been approximately dated to 1000 BC.
3. The brahminism including its caste segregation was given a death knell by the rise of Buddhism in 500 BC and Buddhism being adopted as a state religion from the period of AsokA.
4. The revival of hinduism is seen from somewhere around 500 AD.
So this 5000 years of continuous caste based segregation lacks evidence.
5. The Government of India, at least on the face of it, doesnt accept your theory that 90% of the population being permanently subjugated by higher castes. The GOI provided for only 15% reservation to scheduled castes and 7.5% for scheduled tribes and this percentage was arrived at by taking into account the proportion of population of these castes and tribes in the whole population of the country.
6. The Government of India also does not subscribe to your theory that reservations by themselves will bring out the "Diamonds in the sky" belonging to the lower strata of the society. In fact, the following Centres/Institutes of Higher Learning is free of any Reservation themes:
Institutions kept out of the purview of reservation
The following institutions have been kept out of the purview of Central Educational Institutions (Reservation in Admission) Act, 2006:,[SUP][53][/SUP][SUP][54][/SUP]
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai and its ten constituent units, namely:
- Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Trombay
- Indira Gandhi Centre for Atomic Research, Kalpakkam
- Raja Ramanna Centre for Advanced Technology, Indore
- Institute for Plasma Research, Gandhinagar
- Variable Energy Cyclotron Centre, Kolkata
- Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics, Kolkata;
- Institute of Physics, Bhubaneshwar
- Institute of Mathematical Sciences, Chennai
- Harish-Chandra Research Institute, Allahabad
- Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai
- Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai
- North Eastern Indira Gandhi Regional Institute of Health and Medical Sciences, Shillong
- Physical Research Laboratory, Ahmedabad
- Space Physics Laboratory, Thiruvananthapuram
- Indian Institute of Remote Sensing, Dehradun
- Shri Mata Vaishno Devi University, Katra
[unquote]
7. The issue of reservation is in fact older than the independence itself and wikipedia gives Jyotiba Phule demanding reservations for backward classes way back in 1882 and Chatrapati Sahu Maharaj of Maratha dynasty implementing such scheme way back in 1901.
8. While talking about reservations, you conveniently club non-forward class/caste along with dalits etc. While you miss no chance to point out Krishna as an ordinary petty king and not Lord Sri Krishna as many Hindus believe, you have no qualms in supporting the reservations enjoyed by the Yadu dynasty. Why should a king, a ruler, and his dynastic members need a reservation as a level playing field in free India is hard to comprehend.
9. Nalanda and Taxila being the centres of Higher learning way back in 5th century BC have been reported by many and these learning institutes of higher learning or Universities had many foreign students and local students. One does not find any mention of higher class, lower class, indigenous or foreign students etc therein.
10. The very fact that some academic institutions are left out of this reservation theme only goes to show that the intention of the government is that "largesse" of the government should be shared by the whole population in equal measure and does not have the high ideals of correcting the 5000 year old syndrome.
11. It was hard to miss your glee in noting the absence of Sri Kunjuppu who would recount tales and tales of how corrupt brahmin officials were, as if their mere existence in the past in itself should disentitle brahmins in voicing their views of their being denied (whether such a view is just or unjust) in this forum. It is another matter that Sri Kunjuppa became scarce in this forum after Ozone, another member (now not participating) put some hard questions to Sri kunjuppu and Kunjuppu has found no means to address it inspite of lapse of 4 years.
12. Reservation as a theme will survive only as long as shortage and affordability exist. We do not find any one *cribbing* about admission to primary schools or not having landline telephone connections (as in the not so distant past). The main reason is that people can find them or their substitutes in affordable range. The State had monopolized education and the strings have loosened only in the past decade and it is just a matter of time before this reservation in admission noise will subside at least in higher education. Now facilities are available and people will find means to make it affordable.
13. I would think you are out of sync with reality to be harbouring the notion that for 100s of years (if not for 5000 years) that Reservations are here to stay as a permanent fixture.
Sri Narayanan - Excellent analysis and well researched post!
While I am not a history buff, it is nice to read well expressed post.