I am one of thousands of Brahmins
who was affected by the bitter pill of reservation....and trust me....that is a very bitter pill to swallow.....
The reason I say this is that many, definitely not all, of our forefathers, without understanding what the shastras or the scriptures said, in very narrow minded manner, did ill treat the BCs etc.
There can be no denying this.
Shri Sriraman,Sangom-ji,
As to your points on whether I do not enjoy the fruits of my forefathers punya etc....
I do not feel that this is the correct thread for that....perhaps we should discuss that in a separate thread....
Happy,...No sir, you are greatly mistaken that "NBs feel vedas are against their interests".
2000 years from now the historians will tell that one Mr.Periyar wanted Brahmins to be treated worser then a poisonous snake.
In post #417 I had written, "...Don't you enjoy the trickle-down benefits of the actions of your forefathers? Is it that you are just an unattached entity?" I think there is some ambiguity about the word "actions" by which I meant the assets and conveniences of life which your ancestors garnered for you family's comfortable living; I was not referring to their paapa and punya. If today we are what we are as a result of having been brought up in our respective families we surely have enjoyed the material benefits (shall I say "wealth") which each generation of our forefathers bequeathed to the next? May be there was someone in that chain who wasted and even ran away but we are talking of generalities and not individual cases. Even the mere fact that my parents - whether they were rich or not - fed, clothed and educated me till i was able to earn something makes me linked to the family and, similarly, my parents and so on. Don't you think so? Forget about paapa-punya, which as you say, is out of this thread.
If one is adversely affected by the reservations (as you say you were) the impression I get is that you could not make it for being admitted to some course. That means you should have worked harder. Instead of that, just blaming the reservation system and finding ever so many lame reasons for your cause may not solve the problem. Suppose reservations are abolished, if someone just scores below the cut-off point will again feel bad; the only difference is there is no SC/ST who takes a seat. So, your case is not merit oriented but one of jealousy in some SC/ST getting admission.Dear Sangom Ji,
wow, is that how we build the egalitarian society in the 21st century??
Tell a aspiring student, your forefathers discriminated yesterday so you will be discriminated today?
Its also possible Ones father/grandfather worked hard to get a basic education or climbed the economic ladder by other legal means. Should we tell him your forefathers hardwork is your liability?
The social/economic model you are proposing will lead a "Race to the Bottom", were groups (caste, religion) find ways to show they are downtrodden to avail benefits.
thanks,
My reasoning is not based on jealousy or meritless-ness for my Student. I said the model (reservation based on past deeds) is not a great way to build the society.If one is adversely affected by the reservations (as you say you were) the impression I get is that you could not make it for being admitted to some course. That means you should have worked harder. Instead of that, just blaming the reservation system and finding ever so many lame reasons for your cause may not solve the problem. Suppose reservations are abolished, if someone just scores below the cut-off point will again feel bad; the only difference is there is no SC/ST who takes a seat. So, your case is not merit oriented but one of jealousy in some SC/ST getting admission.
I commend the perseverance of the student you mentioned. But we should not keep narrowing the window on this group to persevere or perish. IMO, that is not correctI know of a very brilliant TB boy who could not get IIT (this is some years back). He was very disheartened but studied well and wrote the All India Test for admission to I.I.Sc., Bengaluru, scored high, got Computer Science, which was his favourite and is now doing well in the US. Really meritorious (as we TBs imagine ourselves to be) should do like that instead of grumbling about reservations IMO.
I'm not trying to vouch for the merit-less. But please tell me what should merit be based on ?Even if the cut-off marks are lowered to 40 or 50 there will always be many people who will lose by a few marks. Asking that the benefit given to someone else (SC/ST/OBC here) be stopped in the hope that all seats will come to TBs, and vehemently arguing for that, is a futile exercize, I think.
Without any Mandal Commission report Mr.Kapil Sibal has made reservation for Foreign students at IITs and IIMs. Probably the reason is that India discriminated foreigners and mercilessly fought against their establishments all throughout its history!
Unfortunately none seems to have reacted to this announcement!!Shri Ganamukundhapriya,
A google search did not give anything about such reservation. Can you cite your source?
I understand that the prestige of IITs and some of the IIMs have gone down in recent years and those who can afford are joining other private institutions in India or are joining foreign universities if they can afford it. In such circumstances, what is wrong if some seats are reserved for foreign students (may be NRIs or POIs also)? India will earn some foreign exchange that way, will it not?
Dear Ganamukundhapriya Ji,
As Sri sangom Ji mentioned, I can not see any evidence of this.
However, why do you think that admitting foreign students at Indian schools is an issue? In these times of globalization/interaction, I would think that it is a plus. From time immemorial, we have always welcomed foreign students, from Afghanistan to China to African countries and now some western countries. This is how new ideas are generated and countries become friends. Let us not be xenophobic.
Regards,
KRS
Without any Mandal Commission report Mr.Kapil Sibal has made reservation for Foreign students at IITs and IIMs. Probably the reason is that India discriminated foreigners and mercilessly fought against their establishments all throughout its history!
Unfortunately none seems to have reacted to this announcement!!
I guess the question is, In a country with limited resources what is the best way to use those resources to uplift society
1) Reserve seats to NRI/POI and pocket some foreign exchange
2) Create a citizen Engineer and hope he stays back and contributes to the society....
thanks,
Were these non-brahmins converted into brahmins? Were they allowed to function as purohits? Please let me know. Please do not assume i am looking for popular names (bcoz am not).
However, he hears that 'brahmins want all hindus to follow their own traditional occupation only'.
Nobody is against the vedas sir. Even the DK has realised that going against hindu beleifs will not help create a popular image for themselves.
Firstly I don't perceive reservation as a "wrong"; it is "positive discrimination". A democratic government which aims at bringing equality has to first do something to bring up those groups which have been crushed for centuries and then only the government can (and should) think of egalitarianism in the sense that from the government's side it will treat all the citizens as equals. It is based on the very same principle that we have reservation for women, free education for girls, and many other governmental schemes.Dear Sangom Ji,
My reasoning is not based on jealousy or meritless-ness for my Student. I said the model (reservation based on past deeds) is not a great way to build the society.
When there are two students one with score 44 and another with score 88, to say the 44 goes in because he belongs to one group and the 88 goes home because he belongs to another group is not correct (this is a new form of discrimination). I have seen cases where they both have similar economic background.
Two wrongs does not make it right!!
As I have explained above merit will continue to be measured by different yardsticks for quite sometime to come and, till then, a brahmin or a FC student will have to aim at cent per cent and nothing less while the traditionally neglected will have a lower mark to cross.I'm not trying to vouch for the merit-less. But please tell me what should merit be based on ?
thanks,
Why should they be converted. Are you advocating teaching Vedas for forced conversion?
If Daliths are very keen to be called as Brahmans, let them now enumerate themselves as Brahmans in the census. Saint Ramanujam did some conversion purely in the spirit of Dharmashastra. It is just to prove that Brahmin ways of life is possible for all. It doesn't mean that the entire world can be converted to Brahmans.
I, today approve what Saint Thiruvalluvar say as only tillers of the soil to be living a worthy independent life. I also approve Brahmins taking to agriculture. But that doesn't mean that I expect Sankara Madam or ******* to enforce it for all Brahmins. I myself will not take up agriculture just because saint Thiruvalluvar ridiculed my way of life as inferior. I also believe that people of all communities will be as sensible as me and they will not indulge in any knee jerk reaction the moment somebody has said something.
I think we, as brahmins, should look at it this way. vAmana pushed mahAbali, a great, virtuous and able king, down into the pAtALa for the crime that Mahabali, an asura by birth, aspired for Indra's post (who should not have done so, since asuras as a class were forbidden from that because of their origin and earlier anti-deva acts done by their ancestors, and their individual merit). Now after several thousands of years, in this Kaliyuga, mahAvishnu has taken avatAr as "maNDal" - maNDalAvatAra - and with His 'cakrAyudha' transformed as the weapon known as 'reservation', He is pushing some others down to pAtALa in order that divine justice is done as per the dictum "paritrANAya sAdhUnAM vinASAyaca dushkr^tAm..." !!
Dear HH,Dear Sir,
I certainly wud not like to equate reservations with 'justice' based on story-like events from a bygone era...
The word "vAmana", of doubtful origin as per Monier williams' dictionary, has the primary meaning of "dwarf". Vinayaka is spoken of as vAmanarUpa in this sense only and not as the avatAr.Btw, this Vamana who sent Bali to Patala was not necessarily the Vamana of the Vishnu avatara. Vamana is also said by some to be Vinayaka (i think many of us say this almost everyday "...Vamana roopa Maheshwara putra...")...and i think Patala means Srilanka, Cambodia, Thailand, Indonesia (SE Asia in general).
There is enough evidence to show that the rigvedic people believed in a "life after death", with Yama being the first human who died and went to the other region. I, therefore, do not think that the pUrvameemAmsa taught that the body is Atman. In fact the concept of Atman is not well developed in the rigvEda and not also in much of YV, though some discussions in brihadAraNyakOpanishad do throw some basic thoughts about it. (I have written elsewhere how yAjnavalkya, faced with piercing question from Gargi, which he could not answer, curses her head to split and fall down!!Today, many (or all) of us follow some asura beliefs, like adorning dead bodies with flowers and making markings on the body while alive, treating the body in certain taboo ways, etc (like purva mimansa teachings). And till date many of us follow the deva type beleifs also, in the form of philosophies like advaitha which make us realise that the atman is immutable, immortal and ofcourse is not the body (like uttara mimansa teachings perhaps).
I do not think I said anything to this effect in my post; the only thing I said was that maNDal might be considered as an avatAr who did something for justice.So today i do not think anyone can claim to be inheritors of any legacy from asuras or devas (if at all these were "real beings" and not just spirits as the veddahs and kapuralas consider them to be).
Even if we assume Reservation is all good, should it be based on race, place of birth, religion, caste, creed, color or Gender?Firstly I don't perceive reservation as a "wrong"; it is "positive discrimination". A democratic government which aims at bringing equality has to first do something to bring up those groups which have been crushed for centuries and then only the government can (and should) think of egalitarianism in the sense that from the government's side it will treat all the citizens as equals. It is based on the very same principle that we have reservation for women, free education for girls, and many other governmental schemes.
You see, the Indian Muslims converted to Islam few centuries ago to Avoid Taxes or Avoid Persecution and enjoyed the fruits of it for few centuries. And today they are saying they are downtrodden as a community and forced state govt to give them reservation.I think we, as brahmins, should look at it this way.
We live in a competitive globalized world, where new innovations will take us to the top or bottom. We should soon find a way to make merit alone the criteria. If free education is the solution, we should explore that option rather than be resigned.As I have explained above merit will continue to be measured by different yardsticks for quite sometime to come and, till then, a brahmin or a FC student will have to aim at cent per cent and nothing less while the traditionally neglected will have a lower mark to cross.
And you want the esteemed politicians and judges to decide our future? I recently read a report (here) of how 50% of the CJI's are corrupt !!What I wonder is how you and some others think that our legislators at the centre and the states as also our judges of High courts and the Supreme Court, have not percieved anything wrong with the system of reservation as such and differences, if any, are only the percentages, the groups included in the beneficiary list etc. Do you think the entire system has gone to dogs simply because some few TB students who just scraped through to the counter but missed it, have been harmes, according to your view? As I said in my previous post, such marginal candidates will be there in every scenario; but the real grouse is based on the SC/ST getting admission with a lower percentage, and that is positive discrimination.
No Sir, puranic stories does not ring a bell to me!!Nor am I very much interested in doing so. But I thought some people may understand that positive discrimination is sometimes necessary, if we justify it on the analogy of the puranic stories.
Shri Suresoo,Dear Sangom Ji,
"positive discrimination" that word sounds better. And you also told some stories to make it look correct.
Even if we assume Reservation is all good, should it be based on race, place of birth, religion, caste, creed, color or Gender?
Discrimination however you look at it leads to broken societies. I'm think manu and dharmashastras authors also conceived positive reasons to build a hierarchical society that many today cringe.
You see, the Indian Muslims converted to Islam few centuries ago to Avoid Taxes or Avoid Persecution and enjoyed the fruits of it for few centuries. And today they are saying they are downtrodden as a community and forced state govt to give them reservation.
few state govt have lined up to give reservation for them. We can also quote similar examples at caste level.
Now the TBs can "suck his thumb" and try to get 100% or unite as a community and try to make a difference.
We live in a competitive globalized world, where new innovations will take us to the top or bottom. We should soon find a way to make merit alone the criteria. If free education is the solution, we should explore that option rather than be resigned.
And you want the esteemed politicians and judges to decide our future? I recently read a report (here) of how 50% of the CJI's are corrupt !!
No Sir, puranic stories does not ring a bell to me!!
sir,
i have immense respect for you.
but for the above post, i have only word -- hypocricy.
you very well know am not advocating conversion.
if a dalit chooses vedic education, he should be given the opportunity to pursue it....that's all.
and no orthodoxy can behave like batuprasad sharma in today's times...just nobody has the right to ask dalits to go back to old professions, irrespective of whether it is from the shastra-pov or not.
and as regards what Sri Ramanuja did, i leave it to Shri Nara to explain.
regards.
Dear Sangom Ji,
"positive discrimination" that word sounds better. And you also told some stories to make it look correct.
Now the TBs can "suck his thumb" and try to get 100% or unite as a community and try to make a difference.
Radhe Krishna...
I don't understand as to what productive purpose will be served by providing opportunity with vedas to the Daliths. Anyhow I am not against it. Let the Government that has given Reservation announce that the Daliths who have mastered vedas henceforth will chant it in every temple and will get paid for it. Let them also be paid for it for chanting in school prayers, office pujas etc. How can Brahmins give them opportunity?
Thankyou for the offer sir. But i do not think the dalits are looking forward to such offers.I can give them opportunity to recite them during the programs I arrange in Sabhas but I cannot afford paying them. But what goods these experiments can deliver. This can only impoverish Daliths just as TBs.
Am basically tired of such comparisons. I suppose it is best we talk about the prob on hand instead of comparisons with US govt, Visas, and so on.Try suggesting this to US Government. Let them restrict issue of Visa for temple related works only to Daliths. But don't think that they will automatically get acceptance to perform in household rituals, homams etc of both TBs and NBs. Daliths have to slog for it. Only God can help them in such Saga just as he helped the identified one at Chidambaram.
Radhe Krishna Sri Ganamukundapriya Ji,
Perhaps you have not gone thru some old posts on this forum on this topic.
In other states, dalits are allowed to pursue vedic education. One example: TTD Vedapathsalas admit dalits into their schools. The prob, however, is with tamilnadu alone.
Am not sure if you will find more than a handful of dalits interested in vedic education at any point of time. They very well know the path to success is secular-education, materialism and so on.
However, to the dalits, their struggle appears to be only with the ideology. That is, the ideology of discrimination against them (wrt their social standing, denial of religiousity and so on) based on their birth.
If a few were to get into certain vedic schools, i think they basically want to convey to the society at large that
1) occupation of a boy cannot be fixed at birth based upon his father's occupation;
2) at birth no child is inferior.
3) that it is possible to change varna
And this does make a massive difference to those who are regularly discriminated against in myriad ways.
Btw, sir, perhaps that this struggle is not new or recent (it must have existed in the ancient past in a different way..).
Thankyou for the offer sir. But i do not think the dalits are looking forward to such offers.
Am basically tired of such comparisons. I suppose it is best we talk about the prob on hand instead of comparisons with US govt, Visas, and so on.
Regards.
Radhe Krishna,
Tamilnadu is step ahead and the Government here has passed GO for inducting Daliths who have passed purohith exams. But this is not the way to prove the point. Dr.B.R.Ambethkar did not opted this path. But Nandanar opted this path and got success.
Just identify the handful of the Daliths who are interested. I will make my first donation to build a temple for their purpose. Let them maintain it as per Ahama Saastra or by own method just like the Jains do. God will definitely reside at their place if they are sincere. People will flock to the place where the God is. Slowly that will effect transformation. But understand that it is not about the livelihood or pride of the Daliths as you made out in your previous posts. Change can come only at this rate.
It is only those who don't like such changes happening in this world demand for the impossible rate of change and picturise India and its heritage badly. No other race in this world has successfully experimented with Truth as that has happened in India by us. Avoid making comparison between states or faiths in this regard and do something positively to effect some change.
Tell me who has got power in this world to bring in such radical changes. Understand as to how much Mr.Obama has to digest for a mosque at Zero site. Only courts can sometime suggest sweeping changes. It ordered free distribution of food grains recently. But such orders practically only initiates discussions. Implementation seldom happen. The SC is going to do it again on 24th with Ayodhya issue. SC also can be made to do such things with Reservations for Brahmins.