sangom
0
I could get some info from the web regarding the reservation system for students in TN and how it is implemented. Reproduced below:
"Reservation policy in Tamil Nadu
[edit] Historical perspective
The reservation system in Tamil Nadu is much in contrast to the rest
of India, not by the nature of reservation but by its history. When
the first reservation protest hit New Delhi in May 2006, a contrasting
quiet serenity was noticed in Chennai. Later, as the anti-reservation
lobby gained in visibility in Delhi, Chennai saw quiet street protests
demanding reservation. Doctors in Chennai, including doctors
association for social equality(DASE) were in the forefront expressing
their support for reservation in institutions of higher education run
by the Central government.
[edit] Present practice
At present, in day to day practice, reservation works out to somewhat
less than 69%, depending on how many non-reserved category students
are admitted in the super-numerary seats. If 100 seats are available,
first, two merit lists are drawn up without considering community
(reserved or unreserved), one for 31 seats and a second for 50 seats,
corresponding to 69% reservation and 50% reservation respectively. Any
non-reserved category students placing in the 50 seat list and not in
the 31 seat list are admitted under super-numerary quota (i.e.) seats
are added to the 100 for these students. The 31 seat list is used as
the non-reserved open admission list and 69 seats are filled up using
the 69% reservation formula (30 seats obc, 20 seats mbc, 18 seats sc
and 1 seat st). The effective reservation percentage depends on how
many non-reserved category students figure in the 50 list and not in
the 31 list. At one extreme, all 19 (added from 31 to make the 50
list) may be non-reserved category students, in which case the total
reservation works out to about 58%(69/119); this might also be argued
to be (69+19)/119 or 74% with the 19% considered as a 'reservation'
for non-reserved category students! At the other extreme, none of the
19 added to the 31 list may be from the non-reserved category, in
which case no super-numerary seats are created and reservation works
out to be 69% as mandated by the state law.
Ref.Vikipedia"
I think, from the above explanation, that if a TB student comes within the top 50 per cent of the rank list, he/she will get admission as if from the non-reserved quota. Is that not fair enough? What more benefit/s will we derive by getting a reserved quota for TBs? Nobody here seems to know about this as no one has come forward to explain that despite my requests.
"Reservation policy in Tamil Nadu
[edit] Historical perspective
The reservation system in Tamil Nadu is much in contrast to the rest
of India, not by the nature of reservation but by its history. When
the first reservation protest hit New Delhi in May 2006, a contrasting
quiet serenity was noticed in Chennai. Later, as the anti-reservation
lobby gained in visibility in Delhi, Chennai saw quiet street protests
demanding reservation. Doctors in Chennai, including doctors
association for social equality(DASE) were in the forefront expressing
their support for reservation in institutions of higher education run
by the Central government.
[edit] Present practice
At present, in day to day practice, reservation works out to somewhat
less than 69%, depending on how many non-reserved category students
are admitted in the super-numerary seats. If 100 seats are available,
first, two merit lists are drawn up without considering community
(reserved or unreserved), one for 31 seats and a second for 50 seats,
corresponding to 69% reservation and 50% reservation respectively. Any
non-reserved category students placing in the 50 seat list and not in
the 31 seat list are admitted under super-numerary quota (i.e.) seats
are added to the 100 for these students. The 31 seat list is used as
the non-reserved open admission list and 69 seats are filled up using
the 69% reservation formula (30 seats obc, 20 seats mbc, 18 seats sc
and 1 seat st). The effective reservation percentage depends on how
many non-reserved category students figure in the 50 list and not in
the 31 list. At one extreme, all 19 (added from 31 to make the 50
list) may be non-reserved category students, in which case the total
reservation works out to about 58%(69/119); this might also be argued
to be (69+19)/119 or 74% with the 19% considered as a 'reservation'
for non-reserved category students! At the other extreme, none of the
19 added to the 31 list may be from the non-reserved category, in
which case no super-numerary seats are created and reservation works
out to be 69% as mandated by the state law.
Ref.Vikipedia"
I think, from the above explanation, that if a TB student comes within the top 50 per cent of the rank list, he/she will get admission as if from the non-reserved quota. Is that not fair enough? What more benefit/s will we derive by getting a reserved quota for TBs? Nobody here seems to know about this as no one has come forward to explain that despite my requests.