TKS in #32:
I think people here have given only their views on the basis of the facts as they were presented. They were only trying to interpret the data given. We need not call it being judgmental. Rather to say that “what came across as narrow minded and extreme judgement of the mother” is being judgmental about the people here. Members here do not know the mother or her character and so can have nothing against her.
Sri Raju - Thanks for commenting on my comments. You are usually thoughtful in your posts and hence I would like to engage you in this discussion.
Yes,
my judgement is not about the people but the thoughts expressed. I do not know anyone to pass judgement of the persons, and I dont care to judge anyone. The data given was about a woman who got divorced, sought to get a child without a man which is possible these days, and tried to indulge in some 'Hindu culture/tradition' like most Hindu families do in USA and in India. It is all a show for most part anyway. So she did what everyone else does.
The real question to you is 1. Do you blame her for the divorce?
2. Because of the divorce should she be deprived of conceiving a child and raising a child? I am sure her boy gave her immense joy and if such a possibility exist and available do you see that it is wrong to do so? If she should be deprived, why? Why would you care?
3. If the lady chose an white man's sperm - is that a big deal? I cannot imagine a TB lining up to make a donation. Why do you care if she conceived a baby of a white man's sperm? In what way it is a manipulation? It is like a medical procedure. If the procedure is available to resolve an issue why not take advantage?
4. In what way her conduct of the function any worse than many TBs. Not long ago I attended one such function of a TB family of busy Doctors. The Sastrigal who did the function comes to our house too and is educated in Gurukulam in Kumbakonam. He knew that the function is a show since he was told to do this in 1 hour and 15 minutes. It was a in a fancy hotel and the homam was a joke. It was the smallest homam and would have made some record. He knew he was getting a good fees and though his heart was against conducting this function he has a family to feed. The main function was the meal. So there is no manipulation involved - there are willing priests who are freelancing available to conduct any function anywhere. Why do you think this woman in the story did any manipulation - she simply availed of the services offered.
Being a birth-based Brahmin only means that you are endowed with the raw material. How you make use of it to produce an end product depends on you, your circumstances, your surroundings, your food, your acquired value system and your society. So whom do we blame?
Birth based Brahmin does not endow with any special raw material. I do not even know what raw material you are referring to. If a household is sincere in following traditions while being Satvic in outlook and hence also a family of Guna brahmanas then the tradition, family values provides an immense opportunity for one to develop interests that may lead to study of Vedas and hence seek truth & eventually understand Isvara. The raw material of the body is no different than that of anyone else in the world.
Do you seriously think this is what a true guna Brahmin ought to do?
In the example of the Seattle woman I referred to I thought she exhibited a sense of compassion for all beings. She had made effort and succeeded in becoming a Vegetarian for all the right reasons. By studying and understanding the Moksha Sastras she may one day be able to teach and interpret. She is Satvic. What Guna Brahmin out to do is described in Bhagavad Gita well and so I won't repeat that here.
In any case I sincerely think that the degree of compassion for all beings and ability to lead a conflict free (Dharmic) life is a hallmark of true education of our Sastras. By that measure this woman in my view is aspiring to be a Guna Brahmana.
Is it possible to say the same about some of the thoughts expressed here? I leave you to answer that..
Yes. who is bothered. But the way a mother manipulated every one-- from the donor’s sperm to the Iyengars who did the homam to the crowd of invitees to the upanayanam-- deserves a critical appraisal and that is what is done here I think.
I am not sure I even understand what manipulation mean anymore. All these services are available for asking and for paying a nominal fee.