ha ha ha... he would have been called names and would have been thrown out...did you present your idea of eradicating quota system in any of dalit forums?
your understanding of karma is laughable... let us not get mixed with topics... your are trying to link between various concepts without comprehending them fully...Little introspection about 'Collective Karma' will answer your point.
And 'All Male race' will get accountable for this evil meted out on women. And only option to escape that bad karma is,accept the mistakes,repend, do good to women and bring them up, to ward of the bad karma. The term White-Guilt also means the same.
looks like you are interested in only painting a picture that we are the aggressors and you are the oppressed.
>>>>your understanding of karma is laughable...
Seshadri,Oh Please!!These adjectives doesnt add any value to the discussion here.
Seshadri says>>>there is no collective karma, it is only individual... and it depends both on the doer and the recipient... and their perception of their situation too...>>>
Seshadri, Im sure you will stick to your claim of "No Collective Karma". Please book mark this too, as we are heading for an interesting topic..
As far as I know, 'Collective /group Karma' is one of the important doctrine in Hinduism & Buddhism too. Its the main tool used to explain natural disastars..
Infact, few months ago I bought an interesting book ': Can God Intervene?: How Religion Explains Natural Disasters, By Gary Stern, it really tells 'Collective Karma/Group Karma as an answer to this".. See if you could pick up this book, its worth reading, which analyses all religions of the world.
Anyway, to make you convincing, I quote here some of the Indian references.
The Dalai Lama attributed Tibet's loss of sovereignty in the 1950s group karmic effect of his country's feudal past.
Gandhi claimed that a 1934 earthquake was punishment for India's harsh treatment of its perpetually lower-class "untouchables," Indian author Arvind Sharma.
Seshadri, could you please present your counterview on this.. Waiting....
...
the question of karma evolving upon beings is not so easy to comprehend as we seem to think so; but you seemed to arrive at some conclusion just so often, based on the logic of karma... and hence my expression...Seshadri,Oh Please!!These adjectives doesnt add any value to the discussion here.
let us consider that there are five winners who share an equal amount of money... the money goes into each of their individual account rather than a separate joint account for them all... does this make it any clearer?PS:Seshadri, could you please present your counterview on this.. Waiting....
n>>>Diversities do exist but so is nature...>>>
Off late I got a chance to quote a line from Kancha's book.. Its pretty interesting..
Diversity in caste names Yes.. In culture Yes.. In language Yes..In dress Yes. In food habits yes.. But diversity in Job participation/Schools(incl women), definitely a BIG BIG No...(thats a bit contrary to A.A)...
>>>>There are many rice-bag christian converts, who have done so out of sheer poverty - there the question is not of religion or equality, but of food, clothing and shelter... religion is immaterial in such cases..even if osama bin laden or hitler had provided them the bare necessities, they would have sided with such individuals..>>>
Sheshadri, by an time in your life, have you attempted to talk to those rice-bag christians, and tried to share your idea of goodness in Hinduism, and tried to make them a come back .. Another option, if they have converted for rice bags, do you think they will come back to hindu fold, if you give them a truck load of rice bags.. Atleast, have you ever been successful with your spirituality, in winning them back? Next time, you see a convert, please try this.
Also, now that in India rice is just 1Rs/Kg, so acccording to you, the conversions would have stopped right..
Keep aside Christians.. with all your good knowledge of Vedas, could you ever be able to tell it to a Buddhist, that, he is also a part of HInduism... Just try next time, and see what his response is..
Sometime back, Palindrome shared a wonderful novel point..Some hindus in U.S join the Church, just because they wanted to be identified with 'A big Group'.. Seems to be right too, and Bobby Jindal could be one among.. But, why In India,we dont find any such think, ie, people wanting to be identified with the top big group of HInduism?
Any conversion needs a conviction towards God.. Otherwise,its meaning less and he is not a hindu/moslem/Christian/Buddhist.
.
i have, believe me... and they are no good... there is a place called idayarpalayam pirivu in coimbatore-palghat highway... and i, along with others had gone there on some other purpose and we met this group of rice-bags :decision:... converts. their minds were closed - the correct term is brainwashed; no amount of logical explanation could convince... you see, as i said earlier, they would have been staunch followers of even obl or hitler, had they had helped in upliftment...Sheshadri, by an time in your life, have you attempted to talk to those rice-bag christians, and tried to share your idea of goodness in Hinduism, and tried to make them a come back .. Another option, if they have converted for rice bags, do you think they will come back to hindu fold, if you give them a truck load of rice bags.. Atleast, have you ever been successful with your spirituality, in winning them back? Next time, you see a convert, please try this.
so, what is the latest term, you tell me!!!Also, now that in India rice is just 1Rs/Kg, so acccording to you, the conversions would have stopped right..
why should i do that? challenging another to refute his claim is not my intent... that is what the christians and moslems do... i believe in the inherent goodness of my religion and try to live up to its ideals...Keep aside Christians.. with all your good knowledge of Vedas, could you ever be able to tell it to a Buddhist, that, he is also a part of HInduism... Just try next time, and see what his response is..
all conversions are fakes; they are only to establish a social identity rather than a spiritual one...Any conversion needs a conviction towards God.. Otherwise,its meaning less and he is not a hindu/moslem/Christian/Buddhist.
Little introspection about 'Collective Karma' will answer your point.
And 'All Male race' will get accountable for this evil meted out on women. And only option to escape that bad karma is,accept the mistakes,repend, do good to women and bring them up, to ward of the bad karma. The term White-Guilt also means the same.
your understanding of karma is laughable..
too many variables to justify in a statement like what you have done above...
please let me express myself as i am... please allow me to express that i too know decorum in a discussion... please let us not comment on others' statement (as above) and try to be goody-two-shoes... thanks...please let us not write sentences like laughing at anyone's understanding...what we know may be the kind that others can laugh at too...please let us explain using examples instead..thanks.
Why do you want only the Brahmins to give up Jathi. Why not ask the Vanniars, Mukkulathors, Arunthathiar and others to give up their Jathi. They form a bigger portion of the population.
collective karmas? i dont believe so... all karmas delvolve individually and that is how it effects... btw, am curious to know how group karma is one of the basic dogma of hinduism! can you please quote the source? (Just googled a bit, collective karma seems to be more buddhist than anything else)...Seshadri, I thought you must be atleast well versed with basic hindu tenets..
You even laughed at me, when I responded to Palindrome, about Group Karmic effect on men for all the discrimination men meted out on women.. Before palindrome could response, you took the liberty of calling me a "Laughing stock'', without knowing that, 'Group/collective karma is one of the basic dogmas of hinduism..
When I refered Gandhi,Dalali Lama, and futher about the hinduisms convincing answers to 'Natural Calamities', you took the last resort to say "Karma is too difficult to understand'''..Probalby, you dont want to loose an argument.....btw, Gandhi/Dalailama never said its complex...Or the author of the book I cited,justified Group karma in a pretty convincing way.Alas!!for you, it seems to be complex one, possibly your objective was just to win an argument here..Not to share the thoughts..
Im not sure if you are a college going student..(wild guess,dont take it personally please).. for me, for last 4 yrs, since the age of 30, I've been exploring hindu philosophies pretty aggreesively with lot of interest(also all global religions)..Thats the one reason, I logged in here, cos I thought this site could be worthy, cos its the place for scholars. The kind of money I spend of buying various religious/philosphical/theological books is 100 times more than the money I used spend on buys rock music casettes/CD's 10 years ago.... Anyways, these are irrelevant to the discussion here.. Apologize, I shared too much of personal thoughts..
If you are serious to explore the truth, please join me , and start engaging in a healthy debate.. Thanks in advance.
dalits will call the shots in a few years....mayawati is a shining example of dalit power.
the other jaathi hindus will be busy in pulling each other legs .....
Sapr33,
111>>>Why shd i be made to pay the guilt-part for what some males amongst the elders did. Why not the good parts. Does not collective karma apply to me here?
222>>>Sorry sir, so far i have felt guilty only for my own actions, not for others' actions. True, karma plays its role, but in other ways. Loss of wealth, land holdings, childlessness, etc..there are very many ways karma is paid back without our knowledge...thanks.
and i saiddid you get the point?
Now you sayplease do not ask ppl if they got the point or not b4 a discussion is complete, other too can ask you if you got the point or not in the middle of a discussion.
if you want to ask me about "points", it is your wish... why would i speculate about your ability to do so...:bored:
did i ever conclude that anyone shd live in poverty. i only asked was the role of a brahmin designed for earnings other than dakshinas. that does not mean poverty. neither does it mean that i want anyone to live in poverty. am in favor for better salaries for priests and for a better life for all. for heaven's sake, how can anyone assume that ppl wud want anyone to live in poverty.but then, on the other hand, you should be prudent enough not to conclude that brahmins "should live in poverty"... without sufficient proof to the same!
we cannot arrive at an arithematic mean and neither is it wise to take extremes... all am saying is that brahmins are not meant to live in poverty... for that matter nobody is...!
Answer to your post is, Karma violates the Absolute Justice in tandom with Absolute Love of God..And I cannot buy Karma's view of my unknown mistake of past getting attributed to my present.. There is a metaphysical dilemma here..
Sapr33,
please note the sentences in bold. dalits are already getting what they want. only some non-brahmin communities that are unfortunately categorized by the tamilnadu governement as forward castes are not getting anything...
not sure i got it properly. what is the metaphysical dilemma here?[/QUOTE]
Talking in line with Metaphysics, I think, we may have to spend long posts here..May be we take long time in uderstanding metaphyics ..
So, at the moment, I take back that line of Metaphysics, in order to stay focussed on our objective(bear with me)..
So do you beleive in collective Karma, as explained by Dalai Lama/Gandhiji.. If not, please present your view,in line with Vedhas..Thanks.