True.. I told this earlier in one of my posts.. The way democracy is going on, will soon end up 'Reverse Discriminaton"... I can sense it..
This is what Ive been telling it all the way around. .. To shed Jaathi, caste, which many disagree with me..I even cited the shunning of Swastika symbol, inspite of it being good, it got shunned, just because that symbol got identified with genocide, for no mistake of its own.. Its all possible,in the democratic set up, that, mayawati/samajwadi party could deny even educational rights to Brahmins (thank God, our constitution is clear, one would not do that mistake again)..
Thats why i cited the difference between Amercian whites and South African whiltes.. I think, India is heading the way of South Africa.
You keep on talking about American Whites without ever reading the history of the blacks in America. You see the world as you want to see it. Not reality. Your knowledge of South Africa is equally sketchy.
Mayavati forged an alliance with the Brahmins in U.P to come to power. You seem to think that you can do anything if you have a majority.
You keep on repeating about the Brahmins denying the right of education to Dalits. You keep on repeating it ad nauseam. That does not make it a fact.
The Brahmins did not allow any other caste to learn the Vedas. That is correct and true. You may have heard of Sir.P.S. Sivaswamy Iyer who was the advocate general of Madras presidency.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P._S._Sivaswami_Iyer
Was he appointed by the British to that post because he had learned the Vedas? He was poor. He studied under the street lamp because they could not afford to burn a lamp in his house. Did Brahmins become officers in the Indian Civil Service because of their Vedic knowledge. It is because they took to English education.
Way back when the British East India company came with the plans to introduce English education in India, they were asked and gave an undertaking to the British Parliament that Brahmins will not be given a priority in the admissions. Castes other than Brahmins would be encouraged to learn English. This is history.
The schools and colleges were run by the English administration and the Christian missionaries. These people hated Brahmins. They were forced to admit Brahmins because none of the other communities came forward to learn English.
You shout that Brahmins denied the right of education to Dalits. How can Brahmins who did not own any schools/colleges deny the right of education to any one. You believe in your own propaganda.
Go and ask the Jesuit fathers of St. Joseph's College, Thiruchirappalli, why they did not ensure that there were more Dalits than Brahmins in their college? Ask them why their college was considered a bastion of the Brahmins?
Yes. The Brahmins denied the right of learning Vedas to other castes. Then did the carpenter Caste teach carpentry to Dalits? Did the goldsmith caste teach their profession to Dalits. Show me one caste which was interested in passing on the knowledge of their Kula profession to others.
Learning the Vedas made the Brahmins dependent on handouts from the other communities. They were worse off than the carpenters and even the Vettiyans. Because you had to get the carpentry work done and had to burn the bodies, but religious ceremonies were optional.
Do you know that the Doms of Varanasi who hold the hereditary rights of burning the bodies are very rich. The first individual to buy a car in Travancore was an Ezhava. Read about it in K.P.S. Menon's book.
Swastika is still a respected Hindu religious figure. You will find all the Hindus drawing Swastika in their homes during Deepavali in North India. Hindus do not shun it. You have been misinformed.
Your knowledge of world history seem to be limited to reading of your own propaganda material. The same is true of your knowledge of Hinduism. Please read some good unbiased history books.
I do not mean this as a slight. Many members in the internet forums let their enthusiasm carry the day without having a good background of facts.