please explain how? (in relation to karma)a group can act and reap the result collectively...
please explain how? (in relation to karma)a group can act and reap the result collectively...
An event of large geographical magnitude could possible consume both good athmas as well as bad athmas... interpolating this to mean that the very same group could have had performed same bad karmic deeds together as a group is mere imagination...
but there are certain body parts, which even when removed have no negative effect, like removal of one kidney...all our body parts act together as one group and can reap the result...
not a distant shot right...
do you mean to say that even a cut off hand can perform on its own? all our body parts function due to the prana in our body... this prana is the athma, and all our functions are due to this prana alone...there is a conscious will inside programmed cell.
a group of people can exercise a conscious will and can do a karma what? Like building a TEMPLE or many good things as a team... common...
here you are talking about the action being done as a group, not the karmic merit...a group of people can exercise a conscious will and can do a karma what? Like building a TEMPLE or many good things as a team... common...
yes, i agree, but there is no collective karmic merit...i never negate the individual aspect.
there is definetly a thing called collective will, collective identity.....
war is yuddham... if it is dharmic, it is dharma yuddham and adharma yuddham otherwise... it cannot and will not be group karma... just so the actions are performed as a group does not mean that karma also devolves collectively...
which means that you dont understand it...it's like your set theory yar..
i disagree... the mahabharatha itself is a classic example... duryodhana refused to give even one village (he went on to say that he cannot spare land equal to the tip of a needle) to the pandavas... and that is adharmic...One's war is always considered dharmic to oneself.. and the other is always considered adharmic. For both groups, their own side is the dharmic one.
There is nothing called a dharmic war. war is only for self-protection or self-propagation -- both are for self-ish reasons.
Muhammad led his men to defend the law of dharmic islam (dharmic = righteous). To them fighting for islam is dharmic, to us fighting for our own dharma is dharmic. There are always 2 dharmas playing their role on world's stage before both will be gone.
i presume you know the events due to which valmiki became who he was... that is a classic example of the individuality of karma...if you accept collective will and action.. then collective result should not be a far-fetched idea.
I'd suggest a reading on "Nala charitram" for those who want to know the workings of Karma
pali refers to kali yuga.. you are in previous yuga.
she says dharma is not found in this yuga
now you are with me!nobody denies individual karma.
yeah! i get from where you are coming...
you missed the subtlety , that's why I referred nala charitram...
as a forest dweller, he can make a peaceful living like "agugan ... of nala charitram"
but he chose a violent life-style..... this is his own personal decision , though his riches are shared by his family.. when asked to share the effect of his papa.. they refused .. they got the right to refuse... because it is not their decision...
that's why karmam romba sukshumamanathu