You mean that the rest of the world does not take marriage seriously. A statemnt which is preposterous to say the least. I have shown how the West and rest of the world also values marriages. Marriage as an institution would not have survived if humanity did not value it.[/COLOR]
You are saying that only the tamil Brahmin couples are emotionally involved. The rest of the world is not involved in marriages. No emotional involvement Again a statement which is preposterous to say the least.
If the West valued marriage so much, they would not have sought an alternative to it.
I will talk about Trauma later
I got About 15,700,000 results in Google (0.32 seconds) for "trauma of divorce" Thousands of articles like these
How to survive the trauma of divorce | Mail Online
How to Deal With the Trauma of Divorce | eHow.com
If there is no trauma why these thousands of articles about it. Do you mean only Tamil Brahmins get traumized and not rest of humanity.
I got more results, 163,000,000 for "Taking care of your cat". Please don't go totally by the number of search results.
If rest of humanity devalues marriage as you say, why do people get married? Have you read a magazine called Reader's Digest? it emphasizes family values. Thousands of articles over the years about marriages, how to be happy in one, making marriage work etc. I quoted the Catholic religion. Even Catholics according to you do not value marriage.
In a nut shell your point of view is that only Tamil Brahmins value marriages and so are affected by divorce. I do not know in which world you are living.
So you think the Tamil Brahmins are the only people who value marriage. Not the millions of Catholics. You think people other than Tamil Brahmins get married for the heck of it? Or the fun of it? Especially in the West where you can have sex without getting trapped in a marriage.
The number of marriages is on the decline. This seems to be the trend in the west. Even if there are a lot of people who get married now, it may not be so in the future if the trend continues. The west is increasingly seeing marriage as something dispensable
It is a social experiment. No one has ever predicted that marriages rae going to disappear all over the world.
Good luck with the experiment is all I can say.
The girl's life is sacrificed for protecting the standing of the parents. Is it a self less act. Which sasthra tells you to sacrifice the welfare of your child for your social standing. Does not the scriptures prescribe a duty for the parents? Do the Tamil brahmins believe the children are to be the sacrificial goats for protecting their standing in the community.
When did social standing become a Brahminicl value? It is not. It goes against the very basics of Brahminical values
Why do you want to assume that it is ONLY for the standing in the society that the parents wanted the marriage to continue?