Dear Shri.Y: I find sarcacism in the last line of your post no.156.
I do agree that we need "fresh oxygen".
We can not support Gay activism just because 10-15% of the population is Gay. That way, if 25% of population are criminals, are we going to support crime?
When I said, "Thinking English", I did not mean English language. I implied Western thinking, which I think is what that thread starter also implied.
Nara ji: You have convenienty skipped some of the issues, as you always do. There is no denial that HS is unnatural. Are we justifying it because even animals practise it? Haven't we "evolved"? (Poor Darwin).
Dear Haridasa:
My post #156 is my answer to Ms. Harini. What part of it you find sarcastic?
Have you heard of the Tyranny of the Majority? A 10-15% of the population - a small minority - may be Gays; but they need their Civil Rights restored or protected as per the Constitution..
Your comparison to criminals of 25% of population is totally inappropriate here - these criminals must face the laws of the land for their felonies, period.
In this broadband internet age, there is instantaneous communications of ideas from West to East and North to South.
Nowadays, nothing is guarded as "Western", except may be the military intelligence and R&D of major companies, IMO!
Cheers.
Last edited: