OP
OP
sankara_sharmah
Guest
We are always taught to read the life of the Saints. A perusal of many of these will show that they took up the worship of a Deity other than their Kula Devata.
If all the Hindus had restricted themselves to the worship of only Kula Devatas, Hinduism would not have reached the heights it has attained now.
There was a question about why Kula devatas are more prominent in Tamil Nadu than in other regions. It is because of the Kaval Dhaivams or the protector Gods/Goddesses. Village deities who acted as protectors of the village were more common in Tamil Nadu than in any other region. These are the Deities which later became Kula Devata. Many of these deities like Karuppnna Sami, Madan, Isakki, Masani Amman and others were not considered Brahminical deities. That is why we have a number of temples in Tamil Nadu where the priest is a Pujari and not a Vadhyar. Some of them have become Brahminized.
But even though the Brahmins in general have rejected these deities , they are the Kula Dheivam of some Brahmins.
If all the Hindus had restricted themselves to the worship of only Kula Devatas, Hinduism would not have reached the heights it has attained now.
There was a question about why Kula devatas are more prominent in Tamil Nadu than in other regions. It is because of the Kaval Dhaivams or the protector Gods/Goddesses. Village deities who acted as protectors of the village were more common in Tamil Nadu than in any other region. These are the Deities which later became Kula Devata. Many of these deities like Karuppnna Sami, Madan, Isakki, Masani Amman and others were not considered Brahminical deities. That is why we have a number of temples in Tamil Nadu where the priest is a Pujari and not a Vadhyar. Some of them have become Brahminized.
But even though the Brahmins in general have rejected these deities , they are the Kula Dheivam of some Brahmins.