sirs - bramins have always been a minority in all parts of the world always except for a couple of pockets perhaps. then how could bramins have domnated non bramins?
2. bramins never had non vedic power in their hands. so how could they have enforced their domination?
3. for the past many centuries, it is muslims & christians who had been ruling india. why were they not able to eradicate untouchability?
4. if a person insists that he is superior to other on the basis of birth ,that can be called untouchability. but if a person insists that he is superior to other on the basis of being a vegetarian, that may not be correct, but then that is not untouchability either. again what prevents the non vegetarian in claiming that it is he who is superior on the basis of his physical strength?
5. so it is clear that bramins on their own could never have enforced so called untouchability at any stage of indian history. kshatriyas and vaishyas were also collectivey party alongwith bramins in enforcing 'untouchability' upon lower castes. so why blame bramins alone?
2. bramins never had non vedic power in their hands. so how could they have enforced their domination?
3. for the past many centuries, it is muslims & christians who had been ruling india. why were they not able to eradicate untouchability?
4. if a person insists that he is superior to other on the basis of birth ,that can be called untouchability. but if a person insists that he is superior to other on the basis of being a vegetarian, that may not be correct, but then that is not untouchability either. again what prevents the non vegetarian in claiming that it is he who is superior on the basis of his physical strength?
5. so it is clear that bramins on their own could never have enforced so called untouchability at any stage of indian history. kshatriyas and vaishyas were also collectivey party alongwith bramins in enforcing 'untouchability' upon lower castes. so why blame bramins alone?