Dear Shri. Kunjuppu
I do understand your anguish but I think we need to be fair to the Mutt and its religious heads. I am not commenting on the aspects of widow, slums and henchmen becoming cronies. Though I have great regard for the present Acharya, I cannot speak much for these days as I don't follow much their activities. I speak during the Paramacharya's times when I was a school going kid and we used to visit the mutt often. Both my parents side, the number of families were huge. We probably belong to (as you put) this middle class of minimally scriptured sans Sanskrit but attached to a "brahminical way of life". All these families including ours would run to Kanchi at the slightest excuse to have darshan of the Maha Periavaal and listen to discourses with rapt attention. If you ask me the Acharya had plenty of messages especially for the brahmin community but I felt more than his messages all these people were raptured about was his oratory skills and extensive knowledge. In short none of the simple messages (like doing the Sandya, simple marriages, avoiding dowry, avoiding silk, having Upanayanam at the right age, not drinking coffee just to name a few) were followed by these people at any point of time. In fact the opposite was true. Dowry, ostentatious marriages, drinking copious quantities of coffee all day long were rampant. Some of the women did shed wearing silk saris but when they reached the age of 70 or 75 when it did not matter what the other women would say. Actually I found this group to be the most hippocratic of all. So I would say about the huge number of devotees failing the Mutt as well. Luckily I have not found them turning to be extremists.
coming from malabar, i think, we were sort of ambiguous about the kanchi mutt. or the sringeri mutt. or any mutt for that matter.
we were deep into our own bhagavathis, ayyappans and guruvayurappans for our solace, comfort and religiosity.
the first time i heard of kanchi mutt, was when one of my relatives, who had 5 daughters was widowed. she wanted to seek solace and blessings from the mutt head. this was in the late 50s.
to everyone's shock, she was told to go shave her head, wear white and come back (not sure if she was allowed to wear a blouse).
years later, in the late 60s, the then junior head visited our neighbourhood. he carefully skirted the nearby slums, and it became an honour issue, that i should join the family in doing நமஸ்காரம் to someone whose values i did not agree.
this incited a battle royale in my household, and defeated me, joined the family in doing the public நமஸ்காரம் when this man stepped foot in my house and immediately departed (total elapsed time 15 seconds or so).
in the 70s, i had a relative who was whispered to have indulged in nefarious activities as part of indira gandhi's henchmen, and incidentally enriched himself. he retired, and almost immediately, got a high position at the kanchi mutt, much to my indignation. his wife explained to questioning relatives, that it was time for him to cleanse himself of his பாவம்ஸ் and seek redemption.
there were also a bunch of his friends, whom he proudly told us, joined along with him. these were the most reactionary corrupt guys i have seen, who were drunk with the unsupervised power which indira so easily and willingly dispensed.
i could not but feel a pang when i heard of the present mutt head's initial arrest. not that i had any soft feelings for him, but the ingrained பார்ப்பான் in me drummed over 16 years of living at home, i guess, must have had an hand in it.
i talked to a lot of folks including a dear friend in sydney australia. he wanted me to read a book by the previous mutt head, and i very explicitly told him the circumstances under which i abhor such company and such company's creations.
i notice that there are two groups who are ardent devotees of the mutt. one are the simpletons, like sankarraman, who felt betrayed at the fast paced change of morals, morality and movement towards the 21st century of an organization that is basically rooted in vedic values.
the others are the erudite intellectuals of the like anand, saptha etc., to whom, i think, it does not matter who sits on the kanchi gaddi, as long as the values are maintained per vedic brahminism.
then there is another kind, of the jamadagneya type, who reside on the fringe of the outhouse of kanchi mutt, and who wish to gather the buckets of droppings and hurl them at anyone who would not join their designated path to self destruction.
not much is said of the common middle class, basically not well versed in our dogmas, those who light the lamp daily, observe the concept of தீண்டல் in its various personifications, அமாவாசை, தெவசம், ஆவணி அவிட்டம் etc. ie the run of the mill urban brahmin of the 60s, which my father was, and i am not sure, if such breed exist anymore.
to these folks, i imagine, the evolution of kanchi mutt, to what it is now, is a let down. nobody has addressed the anguish of simple folks with minimally scriptured, sans sanskrit, but with an ardent attachment to what they feel is a 'brahmincal way of life'. these are the folks that are literrally left at the shores of an ocean, while the ship has departed to unknown shores.
that these type of folks are among the most racist and exclusivist, in my opinon, is not the issue. that they are part of my larger community of folks, and who are distressed, and the jawboning arguements presented by various parties here, gently sidestep the realities of a group left leaderless, is something i consider despicable.
also, i have noticed, and i hope i am wrong, these are the folks, who are actively recruited into chp and rss, under the guise of companionship and group honour. and ofcourse, social service. i shudder to the inevitability of TB blood being shed for causes which only the armchair inciters know and for which, my brethren are an innocent cannon fodder.
to some extent, i think the intellectual proponents of kanchi are responsible for this plight. something, they should do to prevent a holocaust of our gullible brethren.
God Bless.
I do understand your anguish but I think we need to be fair to the Mutt and its religious heads. I am not commenting on the aspects of widow, slums and henchmen becoming cronies. Though I have great regard for the present Acharya, I cannot speak much for these days as I don't follow much their activities. I speak during the Paramacharya's times when I was a school going kid and we used to visit the mutt often. Both my parents side, the number of families were huge. We probably belong to (as you put) this middle class of minimally scriptured sans Sanskrit but attached to a "brahminical way of life". All these families including ours would run to Kanchi at the slightest excuse to have darshan of the Maha Periavaal and listen to discourses with rapt attention. If you ask me the Acharya had plenty of messages especially for the brahmin community but I felt more than his messages all these people were raptured about was his oratory skills and extensive knowledge. In short none of the simple messages (like doing the Sandya, simple marriages, avoiding dowry, avoiding silk, having Upanayanam at the right age, not drinking coffee just to name a few) were followed by these people at any point of time. In fact the opposite was true. Dowry, ostentatious marriages, drinking copious quantities of coffee all day long were rampant. Some of the women did shed wearing silk saris but when they reached the age of 70 or 75 when it did not matter what the other women would say. Actually I found this group to be the most hippocratic of all. So I would say about the huge number of devotees failing the Mutt as well. Luckily I have not found them turning to be extremists.