• Welcome to Tamil Brahmins forums.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our Free Brahmin Community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

On Vishitadvaita Philosophy...

  • Thread starter Thread starter malgova.mango
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
correct' a correctnnu thaan sollanum, thappai thappunnu than sollanum - ethula aham bhavam onnume ellai. eppadiellam sadhu janathai bhayamuruthakoodathu, appuram - SB sir sonna mathiri " Ponal pogattum poda than.."

apparam athu seri ellai ,ethu seri ellinnu azharthilla entha labaamum kidaiyathu.
 
Neenga enna vena sollikongo.. adhunaale edhuvum change aaga poradhille...

Everything will act as per its nature...

Neenga correct nu ninaikuradhai ellorum ninaikanum ille?

"Ponal pogattum poda,
illena yarukku enna nattam ada" - idhu thaan nijam...

Enaku therinja veraikum, neenga thaan "idhu thaan seri" nu sollindirukkel...

Siddhanthamellam logic pesaravalukku thaan... yenna avanaale vera edhayum otthukka mudiyadhu... they cannot express their emotions... their language is logic and reasoning... so, avalukku thaan porundhum...
 
>>Adhu neku epdi theriyum... yaaru kaathu vidaraalo avaala kelungo...:ranger:<<
Villadi Villain Sooradhi Sooran S S.Chaala Baga Undhi.:)

sb
 
logic pesakoodathunnu vaya adaicha vera enna varum?

siddanthathlla logic parkakudathunna yen siddhantaham panninar?
 
Some definitions of logic:

1. The branch of philosophy that analyses inference

2. Reasoned and reasonable judgment

3. The principles that guide reasoning within a given field or situation

4. The system of operations performed by a computer that underlies the machine's representation of logical operations

5. A system of reasoning

From a reading of the definitions, can it be inferred that there should be an universal logic which has to be accepted by all?

Logic is based on perception and inference... perception is again based on values, attitudes and reaction...

values - some are inculcated, some are external and some are self learnt

attitude - resulting behaviour of perception + situation

reaction - impact of attitude on values and perception

These are all ever changing depending on the mind of the individual... That is why to each his reasoning... if only we want conformity, the question of acceptance arises...
 
entha vazha vazha kathaiellam yaru ketta...

neenga than logic pesakoodathunnu sollitella - apparam ippo enna thideer gnanodhayam
 
enna sollrel - logic pesallama - koodatha? - vettu onnu thundu rendu
 
Logic pesalaam, aana adhu thaan ulagathileye irukira ore correctaana logic nu solla koodadhu... adhukku thaan logic oda thanmaya explain panen...

Logic is a derivative of perception...
 
naan oru dadavay sonna,aayiram dabay sonna madiri ba.....idu eppadi irukku...mayilu mayilu (16 vayadinalay & rajni movie)

sb
 
sarvavyapitvama eppadi samalikkarar unga achariyar - ethukkum narrukkunnu pathil sollungo
 
Ungalukku ethana sonaalum purinjukka matennu adam pidikkarel... all through this post I have been explaining, re-explaining, re-re-explaining... but still, finally you end up with the same query...

There are certain possibilities:

- My explanation is not proper

- You do not understand

- You refuse to understand

- The matter cannot be understood

- We are having parellel views

- The matter could be understood, but both of us dont
 
un-explainable....

from un-explainable,explanation arise=net result=?

sb
 
mango, naan keethu naama kaaran... from singanallur...

we are smarthas who follow narayana as the pradhaana deity...

my mutt is sringeri from the smartha side and ahobilam from the vaishnava side...

i recite both shiva and vishnu shlokas... i have no qualms with either of them...

you seems to portray that only A is the true path... hence my stance against that... simple as that...
 
if one part is non-god, then saravyapitvam is rendered meaningless - sorry you didn't answer this.

if i ask what is god - then it is very hard to explain , i understand
if is ask what is non-god - then it may be hard too - i understand.

What Im asking is - as VA says a part is non-god , then the meaning of GOD as Sarvavyapi is rendered meaningless - how your achariyar explains this gap.

you haven't addressed this query yet. if you did so - please highlight me to that post. gimme the blog post number...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest ads

Back
Top