It was too much to them since they thought the forum will
collapse without their valuable (voluminous) contribution.
It was also proved to be wrong! :nono:
May I add that your own contribution has been central in dismantling such myths!
It was too much to them since they thought the forum will
collapse without their valuable (voluminous) contribution.
It was also proved to be wrong! :nono:
கால பைரவன்;126375 said:May I add that your own contribution has been central in dismantling such myths!
I cannot fathom who is that 1 out of 21534, but none-the-less I have a different take on the appearance/disappearance/re-appearance scenario.How on earth can 1 out of 21534 members can make all "important heads" quit??? :bolt:Their scheme backfired! :boom:They lost their case and were shown their right place. :tape:It was too much to them since they thought the forum will collapse without their valuable (voluminous) contribution. It was also proved to be wrong! :nono:They have no face to show to the rest of the people. So they disappeared quietly - in case they have really done so.
I cannot fathom who is that 1 out of 21534, but none-the-less I have a different take on the appearance/disappearance/re-appearance scenario.
Although everyone on this forum is a free-customer, that is they do not pay anything to the forum owner, some thought that their contribution in exchange of freebies is so valuable that they can step on everyone else's toes, never mind even if it is the toes of the owner.
Suddenly they took a dislike for the shop keeper boy and insisted that unless the shop owner changes the boy they would not avail themselves of the free goodies from the shop. The shop owner having put up with enough tantrum stood his ground and as a matter of fact pointed out that they can shop for their freebies from other free stores.
Disappointed, some of the shoppers point their fingers here and there at the other free shoppers having brought about this attitudinal change in the owner. The other free shoppers can simply ignore such gestures and continue with their shopping.
It is fool-hardy to participate in such "come back threads" as such threads have ended in vicious exchange of words, at least in the recent past.
The bitter feelings are sought to be resurrected by these "come back" threads and somehow blame the survivors in this forum to be the "schemers". That is why I consider these "come back" threads as poisonous.
The people seem to have left but their bitter feelings linger on!
The bitter feelings are sought to be resurrected by these "come back" threads and somehow blame the survivors in this forum to be the "schemers". That is why I consider these "come back" threads as poisonous.
But there have been some good things to come out of the episode too. For one thing, the "ghost readers" myth has been busted. It was invariably pointed out in the past that although one group refused to come out of the well and vociferously opposed the writing of the "enlightened", their "enlightenment" was meant for the "silent readers" who cherished their writings and wanted them to continue the "enlightenment series" . But the "silent readers" choosing to remain invisible and not voice their support even during a crisis was a blow to the "aura" and "charisma" of the new bodhas.
I was just wondering this :
In Sanskrit the root word Stha implies something that stands,that is stationary and sometimes meaning to halt.
Sthaagita means halt/stopped
Sthaapayatu means let it stand or let it be placed.
The passive form of Sthaapayatu is Sthaapyataam...
Now I am starting to wonder if the English word Stop has its origins from the Sanskrit root word Stha after all the word Sthaapayatu sounds very much like Stop.
Poisonous to a few, but could be nectar to a few? How would you justify a 5 * to such "come back" threads?Could it be favours in return?The bitter feelings are sought to be resurrected by these "come back" threads and somehow blame the survivors in this forum to be the "schemers". That is why I consider these "come back" threads as poisonous.
Poisonous to a few, but could be nectar to a few? How would you justify a 5 * to such "come back" threads?Could it be favours in return?