Shows that this KID is really new to the Forum!!! :bored:
Ypu are picking fight with the wrong person. I am sorry for you.
Ypu are picking fight with the wrong person. I am sorry for you.
यदा यदा हि धर्मस्य ग्लानिर्भवति भारत ।
अभ्युत्थानमधर्मस्य तदात्मानं सृजाम्यहम् ॥
परित्राणाय साधूनां विनाशाय च दुष्कृताम् ।
धर्मसंस्थापनार्थाय सम्भवामि युगे युगे...
As a tambram, and as a saivite, I'd rather have a fellow tambram prevent my race from hurtling towards extinction. Whether that fellow tambram is Ravana or Parasurama is immaterial. I wanted this thread to highlight the fact that we tambrams (iyers and saivites, at least) are hurting towards doom, and there's nobody to unite us. Innocents among us are persecuted, and there's nobody to save us.
Will India Cements, TVS, Infosys, TCS and all assorted tambram led companies unite to save our fellow caste members? NO, NEVER. This is why I saw the need to unite behind a powerful (even if disgusting and violent) symbol for our own preservation.
If I offended people in the process, I am sorry. I will keep this discussion civilized henceforth.
Shows that this KID is really new to the Forum!!! :bored:
Dear Mrs.VR,
Although there is no proof, am told once upon a time dark skin actually signified high status and position - perhaps quite akin to the dark-skinned Ram triumphing over the fair-skinned Ravan.
Some claim the term 'pishachi' (used to mean 'ghost' or 'demon' in southie languages), actually referred to fair-skinned people around Kashmir, who spoke the paishachi language, but were feared as 'demons'.
Some also say kids in andhra are scared into eating quickly otherwise 'yerra buchodu' will come (ie., white skinned/ red haired demon will come).
It is very sad to think that these days fair skin automatically means beauty. Anyone dark-skinned is considered ugly by the present day urban yuppies (sadly, succumbing or getting brainwashed into such ideology can happen even in those who absolutely desist from such definitions).
I feel the craze for fair skin did not exist in an ancient past. Draupadi was a dark-skinned beauty. Arjuna was dark-skinned and considered a handsome man. Similarly, Ram and Krishna were both dark-skinned and handsome.
I feel associating skin colour with beauty is over-rated, and is more like a social 'fiction'...
Regards.
Maami mannichudungo..Nammavala (kettadho nalladho) vittu kuduka vendamnu nenachen..avalavudhan!! Coimbatore vandha, mamava vechu enna adichudadhengo.. )
Dear Happyhindu,
Suggest you read my posts in Religion - "Dravidian/aryna mix is absolutely correct but it is not what you have been told" - this explains how the "current south dravidians came into existence with all its complexities, brahmin priest dominance etc.."
Let me explain in brief here. South dravidian race (currently in south india) are a mix of - "Majority Egyptian Dark Race + Minority Greek Whites" + "Aborginals already existing in India".JK
Shri JK,
I have this doubt about the colour preferences, migration, etc., theories which you propose.
- If the egyptian black coloured people had already inter-mixed with the whites, it is sufficient evidence that the blacks did not have any great dislike for the whites. In such a case there will be no impetus for those blacks, mixed people to undertake a long voyage from the mediterranean or the red sea, all the way upto the west or east coast of India in catamarans or sail-ships, just to avoid colour-mixing. It must necessarily have been for some other reason like famine, search for fertile lands, water resources or some religious enmity in the home country back in egypt.
- If the migration was purely to avoid the inter-mixing of black and white skinned people, then the migrants should necessarily have been black coloured only - no mixed colour. In this case I would like to know how the fair-skinned people of India is explained. Additionally, the black people who, according to you, mixed with the veddas here would not have described those very same veddas as monkeys.
- I also find that you feel you can be like a prophet giving out eternal truths in the name of the Almighty. Your statements are not corroborated by evidence, suitable references, extracts, etc., and you probably feel that the mere assertion "I am student of history & analysing why people are different." is sufficient to clothe your pronouncements with necessary scientific validity. I sincerely feel that if you have done some serious search and come to your conclusions, in a logical and honest manner, it should not be difficult for you to "substantiate" most of your conclusions with supporting evidence. In the absence of such an effort from your side, it is most likely that people mistake you to be airing your profound revelations from Egmore!
A husband is defined as three "P"s
Protector, Provider and the other P everyone knows.
Shri JK,
I have this doubt about the colour preferences, migration, etc., theories which you propose.
- If the egyptian black coloured people had already inter-mixed with the whites, it is sufficient evidence that the blacks did not have any great dislike for the whites. In such a case there will be no impetus for those blacks, mixed people to undertake a long voyage from the mediterranean or the red sea, all the way upto the west or east coast of India in catamarans or sail-ships, just to avoid colour-mixing. It must necessarily have been for some other reason like famine, search for fertile lands, water resources or some religious enmity in the home country back in egypt.
- If the migration was purely to avoid the inter-mixing of black and white skinned people, then the migrants should necessarily have been black coloured only - no mixed colour. In this case I would like to know how the fair-skinned people of India is explained. Additionally, the black people who, according to you, mixed with the veddas here would not have described those very same veddas as monkeys.
- I also find that you feel you can be like a prophet giving out eternal truths in the name of the Almighty. Your statements are not corroborated by evidence, suitable references, extracts, etc., and you probably feel that the mere assertion "I am student of history & analysing why people are different." is sufficient to clothe your pronouncements with necessary scientific validity. I sincerely feel that if you have done some serious search and come to your conclusions, in a logical and honest manner, it should not be difficult for you to "substantiate" most of your conclusions with supporting evidence. In the absence of such an effort from your side, it is most likely that people mistake you to be airing your profound revelations from Egmore!
Dear Visa ji,
You wrote :
This I really dont know..what is the other P?
Is it Progenitor or Paavi Manusha?
BTW Husband sounds like some Avatara Purusha here!!
Today I am going to go home and sing this verse for hubby and praise him.
Note I have changed Yuge Yuge to Dine Dine (day to day) cos we need his help from day to day.
My husband is going to wonder what happened to his wife today!!
paritranaya sadhunam
vinasaya ca duskrtam
dharma-samsthapanarthaya
sambhavami dine dine
Am sorta wondering at the recent threads and posts. And totally :rofl:
Jesus christ is indian rishi, and tamil brahmin at that. Why? Because Vivekanada dreamt so or Savarkar-Vartak said so.
Ravan is tamil brahmin, so all tambrams must acknowledge him as their own. Why? That will save tambrams from extinction.
Everything in this whole world originated from dravidians. Why? Because Dravidians are the best, the highest, most supreme, etc, etc.
Well, its like a change from a serious movie into a comedy movie. An entertaining change and an enjoyable one.
dear Renu!
I forgot about the suitability of the "Paavimanusha" Stuff :becky:
O.K. Fill in the blanks with the suitable vowels
to get the word I meant.
P - N - T R - T - R.
I could have given the hint that these three words rhyme in the end, to rule out the Paavi manusha etc stuff ! ound:
OMG!!! You meant that??
I filled in the blanks with E,E A and O.
To those who talk about Ravana's love/lust for Sita, I have one simple question. Why didn't he force himself on to her?
Dear Happyhindu,
Suggest you read the egyptian history, you will see the atrocities committed by the priests. our Brahmins in the past were as bad by imposing the caste dominance !!.
Suggest you read earlier posts. You dont teach a fish to swim !
There is still a poem which opened up my mind to nature's beauty, I do not remember its words. It is about Pampasara. Rama and Lakshmana are out looking for Sita and arrive at this beautiful Lake , and enchanted by its beauty. The verses even when translated to english would gladden our hearts. If some expert here can quote the verses I would be greatful. In any case Ramayana is good poetry and I think we do not see such high quality poetry in these days,
Agree, but our "HappyHindu" is saying all Brahmins were good, egyptian priests were all good & she has never heard of any such atrocities etc.., sarvo sukhino buvantho - today, yesteray, day before, forever into the past - all lived happily ever after !!. Hence my response. I know for others in this forum, this is like teaching fish to swim
And I am saying this as a Brahm that we imposed this repressive caste system - she doesnt want to believe it !! what can i say !!
Man made Pyramids are there in Central and south America as well. There is no documented proof of migration from Africa to Latin America.Also if you notice all our temples are built as a "PYRAMID" - Gopurams !! endless similarity between us & Egyptians !!
Agree, but our "HappyHindu" is saying all Brahmins were good, egyptian priests were all good & she has never heard of any such atrocities etc.., sarvo sukhino buvantho - today, yesteray, day before, forever into the past - all lived happily ever after !!. Hence my response. I know for others in this forum, this is like teaching fish to swim
And I am saying this as a Brahm that we imposed this repressive caste system - she doesnt want to believe it !! what can i say !!
Man made Pyramids are there in Central and south America as well. There is no documented proof of migration from Africa to Latin America.