vgane ji
It is highly unlikely that TBs headcount will reduce and TBs will require fertility clinics. They have survived centuries. They will think up of schemes to boost up their numbers. They may go away to exotic places to multiply faster and become a threat to others. see how many are going to vacation in foreign places. They will dilute their hard specs and marry other brahmins from all over india and whole world. In course of time they will demand a separate homeland like the jews.
krish, gane,
i feel that you are looking at the future with today's eyes and values.
to give you an idea of how much we have changed over the past 50 years, just two very specific tambram accepted features done without questioning prior to 1950s or even a bit later -
- shaving of widows, giving them naarmadi to wear, and shunning them to dark quarters of the house as 'ill omen'. if anyone has any doubts about this, i can refer a couple of books, written by tambrams like T. Janakiraman among others. reading TJ's marappasu now, and the novel begins with vivid description of this horrific disfigurement. i myself have witnessed one in triplicane brahma theertham in 1988, when i went to perform 10 thru 13th day obsequies for my dad.
- the concept of theetu. not just during the menstruating days of the female, during which the community norm was to ban the woman to a dark room, and worse, feed her left overs or if none available, watered rice/pickles and such, and a bare mat to sleep without pillows (again to revive the memories of those who have forgotten or those who do not know, i can refer books). there is one vivid chapter on it, written in an anthology by perumal murugan in saathiyum naanum, by vaa.krishnan called 'theetum theendaamaiym' (pp 79).
i believe both these above quoted articles to be authentic enough, and also documents of run of the mill common tambram practices of recent past.
sooo, technology, small families, changing attitudes towards women re empowerment equality education career and above all care & love, the willingnes of the family unit to ignore/challenge community norms and voices of relations, and many other things, has made us today, distinctively different from our even immediate ancestors.
the world is changing at a rate, as never before, and who knows what the values of our grand children will be. today, many tambram families go through poonal, more as a social responsibility, without the parent/son ever understanding the signficance of the whispering of the gayatri, or the concept of theetu/removal of the poonal to the ears, when peeing/pooing/seeing dalits, something in vogue till less than 50 years ago. how many of us know tambram youth, wearing the poonal, yet gorging away non veg food or imbibing alcohol? the poonal is no longer what it purports to signify. it is today a social ornament, by and large, and in many a houses, like my relatives', to be hung on the wall or into the garbage bin, the day after it is initiated, and to be seen once a year, if at all, at avani avittam.and (ofcourse) for wedding deaths anniversaries and some functions. no?
people who grew up in agraharams might still remember these, and though they have eschewed it, whether it be that they think these are not worthwhile passing on to the next generation, or simply, the next generation would not accept it.
our tambram girls, opting for NBs as spouses, have made a bold statement, that they do not care for tambram 'values' as they see it. just the same, as WE did not care for some of the practices of our ancestors. why is there so much criticism of our tambram girls' options re marriage today, when we can as a community, merrily discard inconvenient aspects of our heritage? but would not give the same benefit to our girls? something of a double standard at play here? or simply that we have not yet moved forward in our ideas to that level? or we have some self interest which goes against such a move by our girls? or maybe something else?
while we ourselves have selected discarded practices of our ancestors, who knows how much of our own habits would be deemed disdainful disgraceful to our descendents. but based on the past 50 years, one thing is certain - the values of our children will be different than that of us, no matter what we do, to convince them to 'status quo' - ie status quo of today, and not of our ancestors. those are gone for good. closed veda patasalas are not going to reopen. abandoned agraharams are not going to be re populated by tambrams. urbanization and global reach is our community's travel mantra today, and would likely to continue, unless come catastrophic changes happen outside of india.
the only good thing is that mortality is still a firm surety, and hopefully we would all have passed on before facing to situations, unsavoury to us.
Last edited: